Literature DB >> 24899722

Briefly cuing memories leads to suppression of their neural representations.

Jordan Poppenk1, Kenneth A Norman2.   

Abstract

Previous studies have linked partial memory activation with impaired subsequent memory retrieval (e.g., Detre et al., 2013) but have not provided an account of this phenomenon at the level of memory representations: How does partial activation change the neural pattern subsequently elicited when the memory is cued? To address this question, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment in which participants studied word-scene paired associates. Later, we weakly reactivated some memories by briefly presenting the cue word during a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task; other memories were more strongly reactivated or not reactivated at all. We tested participants' memory for the paired associates before and after RSVP. Cues that were briefly presented during RSVP triggered reduced levels of scene activity on the post-RSVP memory test, relative to the other conditions. We used pattern similarity analysis to assess how representations changed as a function of the RSVP manipulation. For briefly cued pairs, we found that neural patterns elicited by the same cue on the pre- and post-RSVP tests (preA-postA; preB-postB) were less similar than neural patterns elicited by different cues (preA-postB; preB-postA). These similarity reductions were predicted by neural measures of memory activation during RSVP. Through simulation, we show that our pattern similarity results are consistent with a model in which partial memory activation triggers selective weakening of the strongest parts of the memory.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/348010-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fMRI; human memory; memory retrieval; memory weakening; multivoxel pattern analysis; nonmonotonic plasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24899722      PMCID: PMC4044257          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4584-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  29 in total

1.  Suppressing unwanted memories by executive control.

Authors:  M C Anderson; C Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Short-term conceptual memory for pictures.

Authors:  M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1976-09

Review 3.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping.

Authors:  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; W Kyle Simmons; Patrick S F Bellgowan; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  An interference account of cue-independent forgetting in the no-think paradigm.

Authors:  Tracy D Tomlinson; David E Huber; Cory A Rieth; Eddy J Davelaar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Different voltage-dependent thresholds for inducing long-term depression and long-term potentiation in slices of rat visual cortex.

Authors:  A Artola; S Bröcher; W Singer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-09-06       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fidelity of neural reactivation reveals competition between memories.

Authors:  Brice A Kuhl; Jesse Rissman; Marvin M Chun; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Distributed representations in memory: insights from functional brain imaging.

Authors:  Jesse Rissman; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Moderate excitation leads to weakening of perceptual representations.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.

Authors:  Paul E Dux; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Recollection, familiarity, and cortical reinstatement: a multivoxel pattern analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Johnson; Susan G R McDuff; Michael D Rugg; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  14 in total

1.  Overlap among Spatial Memories Triggers Repulsion of Hippocampal Representations.

Authors:  Avi J H Chanales; Ashima Oza; Serra E Favila; Brice A Kuhl
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Neural Differentiation of Incorrectly Predicted Memories.

Authors:  Ghootae Kim; Kenneth A Norman; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  More Is Less: Increased Processing of Unwanted Memories Facilitates Forgetting.

Authors:  Tracy H Wang; Katerina Placek; Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  A Possible Neural Mechanism of Intentional Forgetting.

Authors:  Madalina Vlasceanu; Michael J Morais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Multiple-object Tracking as a Tool for Parametrically Modulating Memory Reactivation.

Authors:  Jordan Poppenk; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Neural pattern change during encoding of a narrative predicts retrospective duration estimates.

Authors:  Olga Lositsky; Janice Chen; Daniel Toker; Christopher J Honey; Michael Shvartsman; Jordan L Poppenk; Uri Hasson; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Computational approaches to fMRI analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan D Cohen; Nathaniel Daw; Barbara Engelhardt; Uri Hasson; Kai Li; Yael Niv; Kenneth A Norman; Jonathan Pillow; Peter J Ramadge; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Theodore L Willke
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Suppression weakens unwanted memories via a sustained reduction of neural reactivation.

Authors:  Ann-Kristin Meyer; Roland G Benoit
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Competition between items in working memory leads to forgetting.

Authors:  Jarrod A Lewis-Peacock; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Retrieval induces adaptive forgetting of competing memories via cortical pattern suppression.

Authors:  Maria Wimber; Arjen Alink; Ian Charest; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Michael C Anderson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.