BACKGROUND: Permanent polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents (DES) surface have been identified as triggers of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, efficacy and safety data for the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES), a biodegradable polymer DES, are limited, so the aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the Nobori BES compared with permanent polymer DES in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized trials comparing Nobori BES vs. other DES were included in the meta-analysis. The 12-month clinical endpoints were: target lesion revascularization (TLR), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST). Seven trials totaling 12,090 PCI patients met the inclusion criteria. Nobori BES vs. other DES had a comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.34; P=0.74), mortality (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P=0.98), MI (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87-1.40; P=0.42) and definite/probable ST (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.45-2.25; P=0.99). Despite Nobori BES showing similar clinical results to sirolimus-, everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents, it was superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in reducing the risk of TLR (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.90; P=0.03) CONCLUSIONS: Nobori BES use is associated with a similar safety and efficacy as permanent polymer DES at 1-year follow-up, albeit it is superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in terms of TLR. Long-term follow-up data are needed in order to establish whether polymer degradation related to Nobori BES implantation improves clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Permanent polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents (DES) surface have been identified as triggers of adverse events following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, efficacy and safety data for the Nobori biolimus-eluting stent (BES), a biodegradable polymer DES, are limited, so the aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the Nobori BES compared with permanent polymer DES in patients undergoing PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Randomized trials comparing Nobori BES vs. other DES were included in the meta-analysis. The 12-month clinical endpoints were: target lesion revascularization (TLR), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis (ST). Seven trials totaling 12,090 PCI patients met the inclusion criteria. Nobori BES vs. other DES had a comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.34; P=0.74), mortality (OR 1.00; 95% CI, 0.78-1.28; P=0.98), MI (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.87-1.40; P=0.42) and definite/probable ST (OR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.45-2.25; P=0.99). Despite Nobori BES showing similar clinical results to sirolimus-, everolimus- and zotarolimus-eluting stents, it was superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in reducing the risk of TLR (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10-0.90; P=0.03) CONCLUSIONS: Nobori BES use is associated with a similar safety and efficacy as permanent polymer DES at 1-year follow-up, albeit it is superior to paclitaxel-eluting stents in terms of TLR. Long-term follow-up data are needed in order to establish whether polymer degradation related to Nobori BES implantation improves clinical outcomes.
Authors: Alberto Chisari; Anna Maria Pistritto; Raffaele Piccolo; Alessio La Manna; Gian Battista Danzi Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Rainer Zbinden; Raffaele Piccolo; Dik Heg; Marco Roffi; David J Kurz; Olivier Muller; André Vuilliomenet; Stéphane Cook; Daniel Weilenmann; Christoph Kaiser; Peiman Jamshidi; Anna Franzone; Franz Eberli; Peter Jüni; Stephan Windecker; Thomas Pilgrim Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 5.501