Literature DB >> 24898452

Total nucleated cells as a sole predictor of distinct targets of hematopoietic potential (CD34+ cells) in cord blood units: the results of a large series analysis in autologous cord blood units.

Daniele Mazzocchetti1, Amy Maria Berti, Roberta Sartini, Alessandra Lucarini, Giuseppe Ragusa, Matteo Caroli, Luca Pierelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rapid identification of eligible cord blood units (CBUs) for banking is an important issue in hematopoietic stem cell procurement. Distinct contents of CD34+ cells in CBU can contribute to identify grafts that may be banked also for unrelated transplants or limited to family-directed or autologous use. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Considering thresholds of CD34+ cell content of 3 × 10(6) , 2 × 10(6) , and 1 × 10(6) CD34+ cells, we analyzed a consecutive series of 1309 CBUs. CBUs were collected for autologous banking without any volume-based preselection criteria. Predictors of distinct content of CD34+ cells have been assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: Median total nucleated cell (TNC) and CD34+ cell counts of the series were 6.97 × 10(8) (range, 0.36 × 10(8) -34.9 × 10(8) ) and 1.47 × 10(6) (0-20.56 × 10(6) ). Volumes ranged from 21 to 163 mL, with a median of 73.8 mL. For the CD34+ target of 1 × 10(6) , the best predictor was TNC count with a threshold of 6.63 × 10(8) ; volume results were less predictive with a value of 68.1 mL. For CD34+ targets of 2 × 10(6) and 3 × 10(6) , ROC curves confirmed a stronger predictive power of TNC, above the collected volume, with thresholds of 7.55 × 10(8) and 8.98 × 10(8) . ROC analysis by combining all predictors (TNC, volume, TNC(2) , volume(2) , age of mothers, types of delivery, birthweight) gave worse results than TNC count alone.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis, carried out on a large, unrestricted CBU series, shows that TNC alone is the best predictor of distinct targets of hematopoietic potential with the chance to predict CBU potentially useful for unrelated recipients or limited for family-directed or autologous use.
© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24898452     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  4 in total

Review 1.  Umbilical cord blood donation: public or private?

Authors:  K K Ballen; F Verter; J Kurtzberg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  [Harvest of Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord Blood: Relevance of Perinatal Factors for the Quality of Umbilical Cord Transplant Units].

Authors:  Patricia Farina-Eckhardt; Cristina Granado; Doris Mueller-Borer; Andreas Schötzau; Dimitrios A Tsakiris; Irene Hösli; Gwendolin Manegold-Brauer
Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Predictors of cord blood unit cell content in a volume unrestricted large series collections: a chance for a fast and cheap multiparameter selection model.

Authors:  Stefania Fumarola; Alessandra Lucarini; Giovanna Lucchetti; Luana Piroli; Luca Pierelli
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 8.079

4.  What is the adequate mononuclear cell content for selecting umbilical cord blood units for cryopreservation?

Authors:  José Carlos Jaime-Pérez; Gisela García-Arellano; Alejandra Celina Esparza-Sandoval
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2016-02-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.