Literature DB >> 24898309

Public and private health service in Norway: a comparison of patient characteristics and surgery criteria for patients with nerve root affections due to discus herniation.

Margreth Grotle1, Tore Solberg, Kjersti Storheim, Even Lærum, John-Anker Zwart.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare sociodemographic, life style and clinical characteristics in patients operated for lumbar disc herniation in public and private clinics in Norway, and evaluate whether selection for surgery and surgical treatment were different across the two settings.
METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter study of patients who underwent elective surgeries for lumbar disc herniation at 41 (31 public and 10 private) hospitals. Data were included in the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
RESULTS: Of the 5,308 elective surgical procedures, 3,628 were performed at public hospitals and 1,680 at private clinics. Patients in the private clinics were slightly younger, more likely to be man, have higher level of education, and more likely to be employed. Disability and retirement pensions were more than double in the public as compared to the private clinics. Mean duration of sick leave was 24 weeks (SD 36.4) in the public and 15 weeks (20.7) in the private clinics. There were minor differences in pain, disability and quality-of life, number of verified disc herniations and radiological findings. Number of days at hospital, total operation time and proportion of complications were significantly higher in the public than in the private clinics.
CONCLUSION: Patients having elective surgery due to lumbar disc herniation in public and private clinics were different with respect to many sociodemographic and life style variables. There were minor differences with respect to clinical variables and selection of patients for surgery, but substantial differences related to aspects of the surgical treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24898309     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3293-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  11 in total

1.  EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Does employment-based private health insurance increase the use of covered health care services? A matching estimator approach.

Authors:  Astrid Kiil
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2012-02-26

Review 3.  What characterises the privately insured in universal health care systems? A review of the empirical evidence.

Authors:  Astrid Kiil
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 4.  Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Antti Malmivaara; Francisco Kovacs; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Liisa Salmi; Heikki Kröger; Juan Andrade; Rosa Jiménez; Antti Tapaninaho; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Spinal fusion in the United States: analysis of trends from 1998 to 2008.

Authors:  Sean S Rajaee; Hyun W Bae; Linda E A Kanim; Rick B Delamarter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  An international comparison of back surgery rates.

Authors:  D C Cherkin; R A Deyo; J D Loeser; T Bush; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Jens Ivar Brox; Nina Køppke Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Regulation versus practice--the impact of accessibility on the use of specialist health care in Norway.

Authors:  Tor Iversen; Gry Stine Kopperud
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  The time trade-off method: results from a general population study.

Authors:  P Dolan; C Gudex; P Kind; A Williams
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  Inequity in the use of physician services in Norway before and after introducing patient lists in primary care.

Authors:  Astrid L Grasdal; Karin Monstad
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2011-06-15
View more
  5 in total

1.  From public vs. private to public/private mix in healthcare: lessons from the Israeli and the Spanish cases.

Authors:  Dani Filc; Alon Rasooly; Nadav Davidovitch
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2020-06-24

2.  Which patients receive surgery in for-profit and non-profit hospitals in a universal health system? An explorative register-based study in Norway.

Authors:  Geir Hiller Holom; Nina Alexandersen; Jeremy D Goldhaber-Fiebert; Terje P Hagen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-06-09       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  The association between sociodemographic characteristics and the event of undergoing first-time, simple lumbar discectomy: A case-control study.

Authors:  Dorthe Schoeler Ziegler; Clara Emilie Westermann; Ann Fredsted Aalling; Soeren Francis Dyhrberg O'Neill; Mikkel Oesterheden Andersen
Journal:  N Am Spine Soc J       Date:  2022-02-27

4.  A nationwide study of patients operated for cervical degenerative disorders in public and private hospitals.

Authors:  Elisabet Danielsen; Christer Mjåset; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Sasha Gulati; Margreth Grotle; Jan Håkon Rudolfsen; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 5.  Comparing public and private providers: a scoping review of hospital services in Europe.

Authors:  Liina-Kaisa Tynkkynen; Karsten Vrangbæk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.