BACKGROUND: International recommendations highlight the superior value of cardiac troponins (cTns) for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction along with analytical requirements of improved precision and detectability. In this multicenter study, we investigated the analytical performance of a new high sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay and its 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL). METHODS: Laboratories from nine European countries evaluated the ARCHITECT STAT high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) immunoassay on the ARCHITECT i2000SR/i1000SR immunoanalyzers. Imprecision, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ) linearity of dilution, interferences, sample type, method comparisons, and 99th percentile URLs were evaluated in this study. RESULTS: Total imprecision of 3.3%-8.9%, 2.0%-3.5% and 1.5%-5.2% was determined for the low, medium and high controls, respectively. The lowest cTnI concentration corresponding to a total CV of 10% was 5.6 ng/L. Common interferences, sample dilution and carryover did not affect the hs-cTnI results. Slight, but statistically significant, differences with sample type were found. Concordance between the investigated hs-cTnI assay and contemporary cTnI assay at 99th percentile cut-off was found to be 95%. TnI was detectable in 75% and 57% of the apparently healthy population using the lower (1.1 ng/L) and upper (1.9 ng/L) limit of the LoD range provided by the ARCHITECT STAT hs-TnI package insert, respectively. The 99th percentile values were gender dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The new ARCHITECT STAT hs-TnI assay with improved analytical features meets the criteria of high sensitive Tn test and will be a valuable diagnostic tool.
BACKGROUND: International recommendations highlight the superior value of cardiac troponins (cTns) for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction along with analytical requirements of improved precision and detectability. In this multicenter study, we investigated the analytical performance of a new high sensitive cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) assay and its 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL). METHODS: Laboratories from nine European countries evaluated the ARCHITECT STAT high sensitive troponin I (hs-TnI) immunoassay on the ARCHITECT i2000SR/i1000SR immunoanalyzers. Imprecision, limit of blank (LoB), limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ) linearity of dilution, interferences, sample type, method comparisons, and 99th percentile URLs were evaluated in this study. RESULTS: Total imprecision of 3.3%-8.9%, 2.0%-3.5% and 1.5%-5.2% was determined for the low, medium and high controls, respectively. The lowest cTnI concentration corresponding to a total CV of 10% was 5.6 ng/L. Common interferences, sample dilution and carryover did not affect the hs-cTnI results. Slight, but statistically significant, differences with sample type were found. Concordance between the investigated hs-cTnI assay and contemporary cTnI assay at 99th percentile cut-off was found to be 95%. TnI was detectable in 75% and 57% of the apparently healthy population using the lower (1.1 ng/L) and upper (1.9 ng/L) limit of the LoD range provided by the ARCHITECT STAT hs-TnI package insert, respectively. The 99th percentile values were gender dependent. CONCLUSIONS: The new ARCHITECT STAT hs-TnI assay with improved analytical features meets the criteria of high sensitive Tn test and will be a valuable diagnostic tool.
Authors: Petr Jarolim; Brian L Claggett; Michael J Conrad; Myra A Carpenter; Anastasia Ivanova; Andrew G Bostom; John W Kusek; Lawrence G Hunsicker; Paul F Jacques; Lisa Gravens-Mueller; Peter Finn; Scott D Solomon; Daniel E Weiner; Andrew S Levey; Marc A Pfeffer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jasper Boeddinghaus; Tobias Reichlin; Thomas Nestelberger; Raphael Twerenbold; Yvette Meili; Karin Wildi; Petra Hillinger; Maria Rubini Giménez; Janosch Cupa; Lukas Schumacher; Marie Schubera; Patrick Badertscher; Sydney Corbière; Karin Grimm; Christian Puelacher; Zaid Sabti; Dayana Flores Widmer; Nicolas Schaerli; Nikola Kozhuharov; Samyut Shrestha; Tobias Bürge; Patrick Mächler; Michael Büchi; Katharina Rentsch; Òscar Miró; Beatriz López; F Javier Martin-Sanchez; Esther Rodriguez-Adrada; Beata Morawiec; Damian Kawecki; Eva Ganovská; Jiri Parenica; Jens Lohrmann; Andreas Buser; Dagmar I Keller; Stefan Osswald; Christian Mueller Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Dirk Westermann; Johannes Tobias Neumann; Nils Arne Sörensen; Stefan Blankenberg Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Andreas Duma; Swatilika Pal; Joshua Johnston; Mohammad A Helwani; Adithya Bhat; Bali Gill; Jessica Rosenkvist; Christopher Cartmill; Frank Brown; J Philip Miller; Mitchell G Scott; Francisco Sanchez-Conde; Michael Jarvis; Nuri B Farber; Charles F Zorumski; Charles Conway; Peter Nagele Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Eslam Samaha; Mohammad A Helwani; Jamie C Brown; Frank Brown; Allan S Jaffe; Mitchell G Scott; Peter Nagele Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Mark Sweeney; Gillian Bleeze; Sarah Storey; Alexander Cairns; Alexander Taylor; Catherine Holmes; Steve Hart; Nick Lawrance; William G Oldfield; Christopher S Baker Journal: Future Healthc J Date: 2020-02
Authors: Sunna Snaedal; Peter Bárány; Sigrún H Lund; Abdul R Qureshi; Olof Heimbürger; Peter Stenvinkel; Christian Löwbeer; Karolina Szummer Journal: Clin Kidney J Date: 2020-12-12
Authors: Maurits S Buiten; Mihály K de Bie; Joris I Rotmans; Friedo W Dekker; Marjolijn van Buren; Ton J Rabelink; Christa M Cobbaert; Martin J Schalij; Arnoud van der Laarse; J Wouter Jukema Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Calvin W L Chin; Anoop S V Shah; David A McAllister; S Joanna Cowell; Shirjel Alam; Jeremy P Langrish; Fiona E Strachan; Amanda L Hunter; Anna Maria Choy; Chim C Lang; Simon Walker; Nicholas A Boon; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills; Marc R Dweck Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Joanna M Young; John W Pickering; Peter M George; Sally J Aldous; John Wallace; Chris M Frampton; Richard W Troughton; Mark A Richards; Jaimi H Greenslade; Louise Cullen; Martin P Than Journal: BMC Emerg Med Date: 2016-08-31