Literature DB >> 24896855

Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay learning by pigeons in the absence of overt response mediation.

C K Randall1, T R Zentall.   

Abstract

Win-stay/lose-shift and win-shift/lose-stay behavior in pigeons was compared using a two-alternative conditional discrimination for which the number of trials involving each of the task components could be precisely controlled. One group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were not followed by food (win-stay/lose-shift). Another group was rewarded for pecking the location just pecked if those pecks were not followed by food and for pecking the other location if those pecks were followed by food (win-shift/lose-stay). With increasing delay to comparison choice, pigeons were more accurate on trials when initial pecking was followed by the absence of food than by food (Experiment 1). However, when hypothesized overt response mediation was discouraged (Experiment 2), a win-stay superiority effect emerged with increasing delay to comparison choice. Thus, unlike rats, pigeons may be somewhat predisposed to repeat a response to a location to which responses have been previously rewarded.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 24896855     DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(97)00048-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  14 in total

1.  The effects of interval duration on temporal tracking and alternation learning.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; John E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily H Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Simultaneous discrimination reversal learning in pigeons and humans: anticipatory and perseverative errors.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Mikaël Molet; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Reinforcement: food signals the time and location of future food.

Authors:  Sarah Cowie; Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Midsession reversal learning by pigeons: Effect on accuracy of increasing the number of stimuli associated with one of the alternatives.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Daniel N Peng; Dalton C House; Ryan Yadav
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Pigeons show near-optimal win-stay/lose-shift performance on a simultaneous-discrimination, midsession reversal task with short intertrial intervals.

Authors:  Rebecca M Rayburn-Reeves; Jennifer R Laude; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Midsession reversals with pigeons: visual versus spatial discriminations and the intertrial interval.

Authors:  Jennifer R Laude; Jessica P Stagner; Rebecca Rayburn-Reeves; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Coding of Stimuli by Animals: Retrospection, Prospection, Episodic Memory and Future Planning.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01

10.  Radial Maze Analog for Pigeons: Evidence for Flexible Coding Strategies May Result from Faulty Assumptions.

Authors:  Cassandra D Gipson; Kelly A Digian; Holly C Miller; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.