Literature DB >> 24896199

Diagnostic accuracy of integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for restaging patients with malignant germ cell tumours.

P Sharma1, T K Jain, G K Parida, S Karunanithi, C Patel, A Sharma, S Thulkar, P K Julka, C Bal, R Kumar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of utility of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/CT (PET/CT) for restaging patients with primary malignant germ cell tumours (GCTs).
METHODS: Data of 92 patients (age, 31.94 ± 10.1 years; male/female, 86/6) with histopathologically confirmed malignant GCTs (gonadal, 88; mediastinal, 4; seminomatous, 47 and non-seminomatous, 45) who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT for restaging (suspected recurrence/post-therapy evaluation) were retrospectively analysed. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians reviewed the PET/CT images in consensus, qualitatively and semi-quantitatively [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax)]. Histopathology (if available) and clinical/imaging/biochemical follow-up (minimum of 6 months) were employed as the reference standard.
RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET/CT was interpreted as positive in 59 and negative in 33 patients. Local disease was seen in 5, nodal disease in 50 and distant metastasis in 22 patients. PET/CT was true positive in 49, false positive in 10, true negative in 30 and false negative in 3 patients. (18)F-FDG PET/CT showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 94.2%, 75.0%, 83.0%, 90.9% and 85.8% overall; 90.0%, 74.0%, 72.0%, 90.9% and 80.8% in seminomatous GCT; and 96.8%, 76.9%, 91.1%, 90.9% and 91.1% in non-seminomatous GCT, respectively. Difference in PET/CT accuracy for seminomatous and non-seminomatous GCTs was not significant (p = 0.263). PET/CT demonstrated disease in 13 patients with negative/equivocal conventional imaging findings and in 9 patients with normal tumour markers. No site- or histology-based difference was seen in SUVmax.
CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy for restaging patients with malignant GCTs. It has comparable diagnostic performance in both seminomatous and non-seminomatous malignant GCTs. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The present article demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for restaging both seminomatous and non-seminomatous malignant GCTs in a large patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24896199      PMCID: PMC4112389          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20140263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  23 in total

1.  Testicular non-seminoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  H-J Schmoll; K Jordan; R Huddart; M P Laguna Pes; A Horwich; K Fizazi; V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Testicular seminoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  H-J Schmoll; K Jordan; R Huddart; M P Laguna Pes; A Horwich; K Fizazi; V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Granulomatosis and testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Neha Jeurkar; Ronac Mamtani; David J Vaughn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  PET/CT with 18F-FLT: does it improve the therapeutic management of metastatic germ cell tumors?

Authors:  Christina Pfannenberg; Philip Aschoff; Helmut Dittmann; Frank Mayer; Gerald Reischl; Claus von Weyhern; Lothar Kanz; Claus D Claussen; Roland Bares; Joerg T Hartmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  FDG PET is superior to CT in the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals.

Authors:  Alexander Becherer; Maria De Santis; Georgios Karanikas; Monica Szabó; Carsten Bokemeyer; Bernhard M Dohmen; Jörg Pont; Robert Dudczak; Christian Dittrich; Kurt Kletter
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Role of FDG PET-CT in detecting recurrence in patients with uterine sarcoma: comparison with conventional imaging.

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Rakesh Kumar; Harmandeep Singh; Sunil Jeph; Jai Bhagwan Sharma; Sunesh Kumar Jain; Daya Nand Sharma; Chandrashekhar Bal; Arun Malhotra
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.690

Review 7.  Germ cell tumours of the testis.

Authors:  Stefania Gori; Stella Porrozzi; Fausto Roila; Gemma Gatta; Ugo De Giorgi; Maurizio Marangolo
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 6.312

8.  PET in testicular cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Becherer
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

9.  The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of residual masses after chemotherapy for advanced stage seminoma.

Authors:  Stefan Hinz; Mark Schrader; Carsten Kempkensteffen; Roland Bares; Winfried Brenner; Susanne Krege; Christiane Franzius; Sabine Kliesch; Ruediger Heicappel; Kurt Miller; Maike de Wit
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in nonseminomatous germ cell tumors after chemotherapy: the German multicenter positron emission tomography study group.

Authors:  Karin Oechsle; Michael Hartmann; Winfried Brenner; Stephan Venz; Lothar Weissbach; Christiane Franzius; Sabine Kliesch; Stephan Mueller; Susanne Krege; Ruediger Heicappell; Roland Bares; Carsten Bokemeyer; Maike de Wit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Molecular Imaging for Evaluation of Viable Testicular Cancer Nodal Metastases.

Authors:  Gregory A Joice; Steven P Rowe; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  PET/Computed Tomography in Renal, Bladder, and Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-04-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.