Literature DB >> 20484416

PET/CT with 18F-FLT: does it improve the therapeutic management of metastatic germ cell tumors?

Christina Pfannenberg1, Philip Aschoff, Helmut Dittmann, Frank Mayer, Gerald Reischl, Claus von Weyhern, Lothar Kanz, Claus D Claussen, Roland Bares, Joerg T Hartmann.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Because (18)F-FDG PET alone has only limited value in metastatic germ cell tumors (GCTs), we investigated the addition of 3'-deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine (FLT) to (18)F-FDG for early response monitoring and prediction of the histology of residual tumor masses in patients with metastatic GCT.
METHODS: Eleven patients with metastatic GCT were examined with both (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (18)F-FLT PET/CT before chemotherapy, after the first cycle of chemotherapy (early response), and 3 wk after completion of chemotherapy. In 1 patient with negative (18)F-FLT PET/CT results before chemotherapy, no further (18)F-FLT scanning was performed. PET images were analyzed visually and, using standardized uptake values (SUVs), semiquantitatively. The results were compared with the findings of CT and tumor marker levels and validated by histopathologic examination of resected residual masses, including Ki-67 immunostaining (7 patients), or by clinicoradiologic follow-up for at least 6 mo (4 patients). A responder was defined as a patient showing the presence of necrosis, a complete remission, or a marker-negative partial remission within a minimum progression-free interval of 6 mo. Early treatment response was judged according to the criteria of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
RESULTS: Before chemotherapy, reference lesions showed increased (18)F-FDG uptake (mean SUV, 8.8; range, 2.9-15.0) in all patients and moderate (18)F-FLT uptake (mean SUV, 3.7; range, 1.7-9.7) in 10 of 11 patients. After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, mean SUV decreased in responders and nonresponders by 64% and 60%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG (P = 0.8) and by 58% and 48%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT (P = 0.5). After the end of chemotherapy, mean SUV decreased in responders and nonresponders by 85% and 73%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG (P = 0.1) and by 68% and 65%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT (P = 0.8). The results of early and final PET were inconsistent in 6 of 11 patients for (18)F-FDG and in 4 of 10 patients for (18)F-FLT. Both patients with teratoma had false-negative results on both (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detection of viable tumor after 1 cycle of chemotherapy were 60%, 33%, 43%, and 50%, respectively, for (18)F-FDG and 60%, 80%, 75%, and 67%, respectively, for (18)F-FLT PET/CT. The respective values after the end of chemotherapy were 20%, 100%, 100%, and 60% for (18)F-FDG and 0%, 100%, 0%, and 50% for (18)F-FLT PET/CT.
CONCLUSION: PET-negative residual masses after chemotherapy of metastatic GCT still require resection, since the low negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET for viable tumor cannot be improved by application of (18)F-FLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20484416     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.070425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  9 in total

Review 1.  Development of radiotracers for oncology--the interface with pharmacology.

Authors:  Rohini Sharma; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Molecular Imaging for Evaluation of Viable Testicular Cancer Nodal Metastases.

Authors:  Gregory A Joice; Steven P Rowe; Michael A Gorin; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  αvβ3 imaging can accurately distinguish between mature teratoma and necrosis in 18F-FDG-negative residual masses after treatment of non-seminomatous testicular cancer: a preclinical study.

Authors:  Nicolas Aide; Mélanie Briand; Pierre Bohn; Soizic Dutoit; Charline Lasnon; Jacques Chasle; Jean Rouvet; Romain Modzelewski; Antony Vela; Edwiges Deslandes; Pierre Vera; Laurent Poulain; Franck Carreiras
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  PET/Computed Tomography in Renal, Bladder, and Testicular Cancer.

Authors:  Kirsten Bouchelouche; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2015-04-24

5.  3'-deoxy-3'-[18F]fluorothymidine positron emission tomography for response assessment in soft tissue sarcoma: a pilot study to correlate imaging findings with tissue thymidine kinase 1 and Ki-67 activity and histopathologic response.

Authors:  Matthias R Benz; Johannes Czernin; Martin S Allen-Auerbach; Sarah M Dry; Piriya Sutthiruangwong; Claudio Spick; Caius Radu; Wolfgang A Weber; William D Tap; Fritz C Eilber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Diagnostic accuracy of integrated (18)F-FDG PET/CT for restaging patients with malignant germ cell tumours.

Authors:  P Sharma; T K Jain; G K Parida; S Karunanithi; C Patel; A Sharma; S Thulkar; P K Julka; C Bal; R Kumar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Reporter nanoparticle that monitors its anticancer efficacy in real time.

Authors:  Ashish Kulkarni; Poornima Rao; Siva Natarajan; Aaron Goldman; Venkata S Sabbisetti; Yashika Khater; Navya Korimerla; Vineethkrishna Chandrasekar; Raghunath A Mashelkar; Shiladitya Sengupta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  FLT PET-CT in evaluation of treatment response.

Authors:  Bal Sanghera; Wai Lup Wong; Luke I Sonoda; Gwen Beynon; Andreas Makris; David Woolf; Kirit Ardeshna
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 9.  Challenges and opportunities in the development of metal-based anticancer theranostic agents.

Authors:  Shreyas P Vaidya; Shubhankar Gadre; Ravi Teja Kamisetti; Malay Patra
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.