Literature DB >> 24894575

Women's social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis.

Nora Anderson1, Jody Steinauer, Thomas Valente, Jenna Koblentz, Christine Dehlendorf.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Few U.S. women use an IUD, despite the method's efficacy and ease of use. While studies have found that misconceptions about IUDs are prevalent, few have examined the influence of women's social networks on perceptions of the method.
METHODS: Twenty-four interviews and three focus groups (comprising 14 participants) were conducted in 2013 with a diverse sample of women aged 15-45 recruited from family planning clinics and the community in San Francisco. Half of participants had used IUDs. Women were asked about their social communication concerning contraceptives, particularly IUDs, and about the content of the information they had received or given. Transcripts were analyzed using a modified grounded theory approach to identify themes of interest.
RESULTS: Women reported that communication with female friends and family members was a valued means of obtaining information about contraceptives, and that negative information (which often was incorrect) was more prevalent and memorable than positive information in such communication. Women heard about negative experiences with IUDs from social contacts and television commercials; clinicians were a major source of positive information. Women who had never used IUDs expressed interest in learning about potential side effects and how IUDs feel, while users reported emphasizing to friends and family the method's efficacy and ease of use.
CONCLUSIONS: Misinformation and negative information about IUDs are prevalent in social communication, and the information transmitted through social networks differs from the information never-users wish to receive. Findings support the creation of peer-led interventions to encourage IUD users to share positive personal experiences and evidence-based information.
Copyright © 2014 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24894575      PMCID: PMC4245018          DOI: 10.1363/46e1814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  34 in total

1.  Social networks, ideation, and contraceptive behavior in Bangladesh: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  D L Kincaid
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California.

Authors:  Alexandra Minna Stern
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The cost of unintended pregnancy in the United States.

Authors:  James Trussell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Social network associations with contraceptive use among Cameroonian women in voluntary associations.

Authors:  T W Valente; S C Watkins; M N Jato; A van der Straten; L P Tsitsol
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age.

Authors:  Sheryl Thorburn; Laura M Bogart
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2005-08

6.  Embodied expertise: women's perceptions of the contraception consultation.

Authors:  Pam Lowe
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2005-07

7.  Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.

Authors:  I Sivin
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: a focus-group approach.

Authors:  Melissa L Gilliam; Meredith Warden; Chava Goldstein; Beatriz Tapia
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.375

9.  The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care.

Authors:  K Kost; D J Landry; J E Darroch
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct

10.  HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  J A Kelly; J S St Lawrence; Y E Diaz; L Y Stevenson; A C Hauth; T L Brasfield; S C Kalichman; J E Smith; M E Andrew
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  17 in total

1.  A Qualitative Study of Factors That Influence Contraceptive Choice among Adolescent School-Based Health Center Patients.

Authors:  Andrea J Hoopes; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Aletha Y Akers; Kym R Ahrens
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 1.814

2.  Perceptions of long-acting reversible contraception among women receiving medication for opioid use disorder in Vermont.

Authors:  Catalina N Rey; Gary J Badger; Heidi S Melbostad; Deborah Wachtel; Stacey C Sigmon; Lauren K MacAfee; Anne K Dougherty; Sarah H Heil
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Norms and stigma around unintended pregnancy in Alabama: Associations with recent contraceptive use and dual method use among young women.

Authors:  Whitney S Rice; Bulent Turan; Kari White; Janet M Turan
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2018-01-15

4.  Birth Control Connect: A randomized trial of an online group to disseminate contraceptive information.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Edith Fox; Anjana E Sharma; Jingwen Zhang; Sijia Yang; Damon Centola
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.375

5.  Innovative approaches to reduce unintended pregnancy and improve access to contraception among women who use opioids.

Authors:  Sarah H Heil; Heidi S Melbostad; Catalina N Rey
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  The association between men's family planning networks and contraceptive use among their female partners: an egocentric network study in Madagascar.

Authors:  Alison B Comfort; Cynthia C Harper; Alexander C Tsai; Jessica M Perkins; James Moody; Justin Ranjalahy Rasolofomana; Cora Alperin; Margaret Schultz; Anja Noeliarivelo Ranjalahy; Ravo Heriniaina; Paul J Krezanoski
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

8.  The Sexual Acceptability of Intrauterine Contraception: A Qualitative Study of Young Adult Women.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Kristin Ryder; Grace Skarda; Erica Koepsel; Eliza A Bennett
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-08-17

9.  Urban Adolescents' and Young Adults' Decision-Making Process around Selection of Intrauterine Contraception.

Authors:  Susan E Rubin; Marisa Felsher; Faye Korich; Amanda M Jacobs
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.814

10.  Shared negative experiences of long-acting reversible contraception and their influence on contraceptive decision-making: a multi-methods study.

Authors:  Benjamin P Brown; Julie Chor; Luciana E Hebert; M Elizabeth Webb; Amy K Whitaker
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.