Literature DB >> 24893692

American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists' review of veterinary fecal flotation methods and factors influencing their accuracy and use--is there really one best technique?

L R Ballweber1, F Beugnet2, A A Marchiondo3, P A Payne4.   

Abstract

The principle of fecal flotation is based on the ability of a solution to allow less dense material (including parasite elements) to rise to the top. However, there are numerous factors that will influence the accuracy and use of such a theoretically simple technique. Whether or not centrifugation is used appears to have an impact on the ability to detect some parasites, but not others. Using a flotation solution with a relatively high specific gravity favors the simultaneous flotation of the diagnostic stages of many different parasites while, at the same time, making recognition of some more difficult because of distortion as well as the amount of debris in the preparation. Dilution methods tend to be less accurate because they require extrapolation; however, they are quicker to perform, in part, because of the cleaner preparation. Timing is a critical factor in the success of all flotation methods, as is technical ability of the personnel involved. Thus, simplicity, low costs and time savings have generally favored gravitational flotation techniques (including the McMaster technique and its modifications). How accurate the method needs to be is dependent upon the purpose of its use and choice of method requires an understanding of analytical sensitivity and expected levels of egg excretion. In some instances where the difference between, for example, 0 and 50 eggs per gram is insignificant with regards to management decisions, less accurate methods will suffice. In others, where the presence of a parasite means treatment of the animal regardless of the numbers of eggs present, methods with higher analytical sensitivities will be required, particularly for those parasites that pass few eggs. For other uses, such as the Fecal Egg Count Reduction Test, accuracy may become critical. Therefore, even though recommendations for standardized fecal flotation procedures have been promoted in the past, it is clear that the factors are too numerous to allow for the recommendation of one, or even a few, procedures for all purposes.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Coproscopy; Fecal egg count; Flotation techniques; Methods comparison; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24893692     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  16 in total

1.  Improving the sensitivity of gastrointestinal helminth detection using the Mini-FLOTAC technique in wild birds.

Authors:  Dante Lobos-Ovalle; Claudio Navarrete; Juan G Navedo; Miguel Peña-Espinoza; Claudio Verdugo
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  A method for collecting eggs of Pseudocapillaria tomentosa (Nematoda: Capillariidae) from zebrafish Danio rerio and efficacy of heat and chlorine for killing the nematode's eggs.

Authors:  M L Martins; V Watral; J P Rodrigues-Soares; M L Kent
Journal:  J Fish Dis       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.767

3.  Parasite prevalence in fecal samples from shelter dogs and cats across the Canadian provinces.

Authors:  Alain Villeneuve; Lydden Polley; Emily Jenkins; Janna Schurer; John Gilleard; Susan Kutz; Gary Conboy; Donald Benoit; Wolfgang Seewald; France Gagné
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Further evaluation and validation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: in-clinic feline and canine fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Yoko Nagamori; Ruth Hall Sedlak; Andrew DeRosa; Aleah Pullins; Travis Cree; Michael Loenser; Benjamin S Larson; Richard Boyd Smith; Cory Penn; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.876

5.  Retrospective study of canine endoparasites diagnosed by fecal flotation methods analyzed across veterinary parasitology diagnostic laboratories, United States, 2018.

Authors:  Caroline Sobotyk; Kaitlyn E Upton; Manigandan Lejeune; Thomas J Nolan; Antoinette E Marsh; Brian H Herrin; Mindy M Borst; Julie Piccione; Anne M Zajac; Lauren E Camp; Cassan N Pulaski; Lindsay A Starkey; Cristiano von Simson; Guilherme G Verocai
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.876

6.  Cyst detection and viability assessment of Balantioides coli in environmental samples: Current status and future needs.

Authors:  Juan José García-Rodríguez; Pamela C Köster; Francisco Ponce-Gordo
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-01-05

7.  Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ganna Saelens; Lucy Robertson; Sarah Gabriël
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-02-05

Review 8.  Effect of gastro-intestinal nematode infection on sheep performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fabien Mavrot; Hubertus Hertzberg; Paul Torgerson
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Comparison of McMaster and FECPAKG2 methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas.

Authors:  Mohammed H Rashid; Mark A Stevenson; Shea Waenga; Greg Mirams; Angus J D Campbell; Jane L Vaughan; Abdul Jabbar
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Evaluation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: an in-clinic canine and feline fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Yoko Nagamori; Ruth Hall Sedlak; Andrew DeRosa; Aleah Pullins; Travis Cree; Michael Loenser; Benjamin S Larson; Richard Boyd Smith; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.