Literature DB >> 24893586

Irrelevant stimuli and action control: analyzing the influence of ignored stimuli via the distractor-response binding paradigm.

Birte Moeller1, Hartmut Schächinger2, Christian Frings3.   

Abstract

Selection tasks in which simple stimuli (e.g. letters) are presented and a target stimulus has to be selected against one or more distractor stimuli are frequently used in the research on human action control. One important question in these settings is how distractor stimuli, competing with the target stimulus for a response, influence actions. The distractor-response binding paradigm can be used to investigate this influence. It is particular useful to separately analyze response retrieval and distractor inhibition effects. Computer-based experiments are used to collect the data (reaction times and error rates). In a number of sequentially presented pairs of stimulus arrays (prime-probe design), participants respond to targets while ignoring distractor stimuli. Importantly, the factors response relation in the arrays of each pair (repetition vs. change) and distractor relation (repetition vs. change) are varied orthogonally. The repetition of the same distractor then has a different effect depending on response relation (repetition vs. change) between arrays. This result pattern can be explained by response retrieval due to distractor repetition. In addition, distractor inhibition effects are indicated by a general advantage due to distractor repetition. The described paradigm has proven useful to determine relevant parameters for response retrieval effects on human action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24893586      PMCID: PMC4188189          DOI: 10.3791/51571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

Authors:  B Hommel; J Müsseler; G Aschersleben; W Prinz
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Retrieval of incidental stimulus-response associations as a source of negative priming.

Authors:  Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Distractor repetitions retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Klaus Rothermund; Dirk Wentura
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Affective matching moderates S-R binding.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-02

6.  On the fate of distractor representations.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Dirk Wentura; Peter Wühr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Retrieval of event files can be conceptually mediated.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Birte Moeller; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Attention meets binding: only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Selective attention and priming: inhibitory and facilitatory effects of ignored primes.

Authors:  S P Tipper; M Cranston
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1985-11

10.  When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.

Authors:  Christian Frings; Anna Amendt; Charles Spence
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  2 in total

1.  Useful distracting information: ERP correlates of distractors in stimulus-response-episodes.

Authors:  Lea Donata Priester; Daniel Wiswede
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Oscillations in the central brain of Drosophila are phase locked to attended visual features.

Authors:  Martyna J Grabowska; Rhiannon Jeans; James Steeves; Bruno van Swinderen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.