Literature DB >> 24892187

Statistical handling of reproduction data for exposure-response modeling.

Marie Laure Delignette-Muller1, Christelle Lopes, Philippe Veber, Sandrine Charles.   

Abstract

Reproduction data collected through standard bioassays are classically analyzed by regression in order to fit exposure-response curves and estimate ECx values (x% effective concentration). But regression is often misused on such data, ignoring statistical issues related to (i) the special nature of reproduction data (count data), (ii) a potential inter-replicate variability, and (iii) a possible concomitant mortality. This paper offers new insights in dealing with those issues. Concerning mortality, particular attention was paid not to waste any valuable data-by dropping all the replicates with mortality-or to bias ECx values. For that purpose we defined a new covariate summing the observation periods during which each individual contributes to the reproduction process. This covariate was then used to quantify reproduction-for each replicate at each concentration-as a number of offspring per individual-day. We formulated three exposure-response models differing by their stochastic part. Those models were fitted to four data sets and compared using a Bayesian framework. The individual-day unit proved to be a suitable approach to use all the available data and prevent bias in the estimation of ECx values. Furthermore, a nonclassical negative-binomial model was shown to correctly describe the inter-replicate variability observed in the studied data sets.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24892187     DOI: 10.1021/es502009r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  MOSAIC: a web-interface for statistical analyses in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Sandrine Charles; Philippe Veber; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

3.  The Effects of Natural and Anthropogenic Microparticles on Individual Fitness in Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Martin Ogonowski; Christoph Schür; Åsa Jarsén; Elena Gorokhova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  bmd: an R package for benchmark dose estimation.

Authors:  Signe M Jensen; Felix M Kluxen; Jens C Streibig; Nina Cedergreen; Christian Ritz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  How to account for the uncertainty from standard toxicity tests in species sensitivity distributions: An example in non-target plants.

Authors:  Sandrine Charles; Dan Wu; Virginie Ducrot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.