| Literature DB >> 24892079 |
Bing Han1, Bo Yan2, Jian Zhang2, Na Zhao2, Jinkai Sun2, Chao Li3, Xibing Lei3, Hongbo Liu1, Jie Chen3.
Abstract
The improvement of social support promotes the mental health and improves the health status. The study aimed to examine the influence of the social support on symptoms of anxiety and depression among patients with silicosis and provide the scientific basis to further alleviate anxiety and depression and to monitor their whole quality of life. We investigated 324 inpatients with silicosis between April 2011 and September 2011. The HADS (the Hospital Anxiety-Depression Scale) was the major methodology used to evaluate anxiety and depression, and the MSPSS (the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support) to evaluate the social support level. Among patients with silicosis, 99.1% had anxiety symptoms, and 86.1% had depression symptoms. Meanwhile, the social support significantly influenced symptoms of anxiety and depression. The study suggested that patients with silicosis presented more anxiety and depression symptoms, while the social support levels of the patients were relatively low. The influence of social support on symptoms of anxiety and depression among patients with silicosis implied that improving the level of social support and the effective symptomatic treatment might alleviate anxiety and depression symptoms and improve physical and mental status.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24892079 PMCID: PMC4032658 DOI: 10.1155/2014/724804
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Comparison of the social support, anxiety, and depression of patients with silicosis in related variables.
| Variables |
| Social support | Anxiety | Depression |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| (0) ≤60 | 39 | 60.7 ± 8.8 | 13.0 ± 2.0 | 10.6 ± 2.0 |
| (1) >60 | 285 | 54.5 ± 10.3* | 12.8 ± 1.9 | 10.5 ± 1.9 |
| Gender | ||||
| (0) Female | 73 | 50.8 ± 9.9 | 12.9 ± 2.0 | 11.4 ± 1.9 |
| (1) Male | 251 | 56.5 ± 10.0* | 12.8 ± 1.9 | 10.3 ± 1.8* |
| Period of silicosis | ||||
| I | 282 | 55.2 ± 10.4 | 12.9 ± 1.9 | 10.5 ± 1.8 |
| II-III | 42 | 55.5 ± 9.3 | 12.6 ± 1.8 | 10.7 ± 2.1 |
| Duration of dust exposure | ||||
| (0) ≤15 | 32 | 54.4 ± 10.9 | 12.5 ± 1.6 | 10.3 ± 1.4 |
| (1) 15–30 | 172 | 54.0 ± 10.1 | 12.9 ± 1.9 | 10.9 ± 1.9 |
| (2) >30 | 120 | 57.3 ± 10.2# | 12.9 ± 2.0 | 10.0 ± 1.8# |
| Pulmonary tuberculosis | ||||
| (0) Yes | 130 | 55.9 ± 9.0 | 12.7 ± 1.9 | 10.4 ± 1.8 |
| (1) No | 194 | 54.8 ± 11.0 | 13.0 ± 2.0 | 10.6 ± 1.9 |
| Total | 324 | 55.3 ± 10.3 | 12.9 ± 1.9 | 10.5 ± 1.9 |
*Compared with (0), P < 0.05; #compared with (1), P < 0.05.
Hierarchical regression models for the influence of the social support on anxiety symptoms among patients with silicosis.
| Anxiety | Model I | Model II | Model III |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Social support | −0.0012 (0.0005)* | −0.0014 (0.0005)** | −0.0016 (0.0005)** |
| Period of silicosis | — | −0.282 (0.328) | −0.202 (0.330) |
| Duration of dust exposure | — | 0.169 (0.172) | 0.185 (0.180) |
| Pulmonary tuberculosis | — | −0.190 (0.225) | −0.014 (0.233) |
| Age | — | — | 0.001 (0.015) |
| Gender | — | — | −0.183 (0.299) |
| Marital status | — | — | 0.268 (0.263) |
| Personal income | — | — | 0.286 (0.255) |
| education level | — | — | 0.610 (0.245)* |
| Smoking status | — | — | 0.241 (0.235) |
| Drinking status | — | — | −0.252 (0.290) |
| Adjusted | 0.104 | 0.140 | 0.248 |
| Adjusted | — | 0.036 | 0.108 |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Hierarchical regression models for the influence of the social support on depression symptoms among patients with silicosis.
| Depression | Model I | Model II | Model III |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Social support | −0.068 (0.009)*** | −0.065 (0.009)*** | −0.061 (0.010)*** |
| Period of silicosis | — | 0.335 (0.293) | 0.441 (0.295) |
| Duration of dust exposure | — | −0.295 (0.154) | −0.152 (0.160) |
| Pulmonary tuberculosis | — | −0.256 (0.201) | −0.093 (0.208) |
| Age | — | — | −0.740 (0.267)** |
| Gender | — | — | −0.020 (0.013) |
| Marital status | — | — | −0.254 (0.235) |
| Personal income | — | — | −0.012 (0.219) |
| education level | — | — | −0.012 (0.228) |
| Smoking status | — | — | 0.320 (0.209) |
| Drinking status | — | — | −0.254 (0.259) |
| Adjusted | 0.373 | 0.393 | 0.443 |
| Adjusted | — | 0.020 | 0.050 |
**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.