Diane C Cowper1, Joseph D Kubal, Charles Maynard, Denise M Hynes. 1. Veterans Affairs Information Resource Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Service Research and Development Service Resource Center at the Edward Hines, Jr, Veterans Affairs Hospital, Hines, IL 60141-5000, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mortality data are important tools for research requiring vital status information. We reviewed the major mortality databases and mortality ascertainment services available in the United States, including the National Death Index (NDI), the Social Security Administration (SSA) files, and the Department of Veterans Affairs databases. METHODS: The content, reliability, and accuracy of mortality sources are described and compared. We also describe how investigators can gain access to these resources and provide further contact information. RESULTS: We reviewed the accuracy of major mortality sources. The sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of the true number of deaths) of the NDI ranged from 87.0% to 97.9%, whereas the sensitivity for the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) ranged between 80.0% and 94.5%. The sensitivity of SSA files ranged between 83.0% and 83.6%. Sensitivity for the VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: While several national mortality ascertainment services are available for vital status (i.e., death) analyses, the NDI information demonstrated the highest sensitivity and, currently, it is the only source at the national level with a cause of death field useful for research purposes. Researchers must consider methods used to ascertain vital status as well as the quality of the information in mortality databases.
PURPOSE: Mortality data are important tools for research requiring vital status information. We reviewed the major mortality databases and mortality ascertainment services available in the United States, including the National Death Index (NDI), the Social Security Administration (SSA) files, and the Department of Veterans Affairs databases. METHODS: The content, reliability, and accuracy of mortality sources are described and compared. We also describe how investigators can gain access to these resources and provide further contact information. RESULTS: We reviewed the accuracy of major mortality sources. The sensitivity (i.e., the proportion of the true number of deaths) of the NDI ranged from 87.0% to 97.9%, whereas the sensitivity for the VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator System (BIRLS) ranged between 80.0% and 94.5%. The sensitivity of SSA files ranged between 83.0% and 83.6%. Sensitivity for the VA Patient Treatment File (PTF) was 33%. CONCLUSIONS: While several national mortality ascertainment services are available for vital status (i.e., death) analyses, the NDI information demonstrated the highest sensitivity and, currently, it is the only source at the national level with a cause of death field useful for research purposes. Researchers must consider methods used to ascertain vital status as well as the quality of the information in mortality databases.
Authors: Andy I Choi; Eric Vittinghoff; Steven G Deeks; Cristin C Weekley; Yongmei Li; Michael G Shlipak Journal: AIDS Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Dorcas J Dobie; Charles Maynard; Daniel R Kivlahan; Kay M Johnson; Tracy Simpson; Andrew C David; Katharine Bradley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Denise M Hynes; Ruth A Perrin; Steven Rappaport; Joanne M Stevens; John G Demakis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2004-06-07 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lisa S Seyfried; Helen C Kales; Rosalinda V Ignacio; Yeates Conwell; Marcia Valenstein Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Marcia Valenstein; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Dara Ganoczy; Daniel Eisenberg; Paul N Pfeiffer; Karen Downing; Katherine Hoggatt; Mark Ilgen; Karen L Austin; Kara Zivin; Frederic C Blow; John F McCarthy Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Frederic C Blow; Amy S B Bohnert; Mark A Ilgen; Rosalinda Ignacio; John F McCarthy; Marcia M Valenstein; Kerry L Knox Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Wilfred R Pigeon; Peter C Britton; Mark A Ilgen; Ben Chapman; Kenneth R Conner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: W Lane Duvall; Lori B Croft; Jared S Corriel; Andrew J Einstein; Jonathan E Fisher; Pilar S Haynes; Randi K Rose; Milena J Henzlova Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952