Literature DB >> 24890275

Cryopreservation of human embryos and its contribution to in vitro fertilization success rates.

Kai Mee Wong1, Sebastiaan Mastenbroek2, Sjoerd Repping1.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation of human embryos is now a routine procedure in assisted reproductive technologies laboratories. There is no consensus on the superiority of any protocol, and substantial differences exist among centers in day of embryo cryopreservation, freezing method, selection criteria for which embryos to freeze, method of embryo thawing, and endometrial preparation for transfer of frozen-thawed embryos. In the past decade, the number of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles per started in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle increased steadily, and at the same time the percentage of frozen-thawed embryo transfers that resulted in live births increased. Currently, cryopreservation of human embryos is more important than ever for the cumulative pregnancy rate after IVF. Interestingly, success rates after frozen-thawed embryo transfer are now nearing the success rates of fresh embryo transfer. This supports the hypothesis of so called freeze-all strategies in IVF, in which all embryos are frozen and no fresh transfer is conducted, to optimize success rates. High-quality randomized controlled trials should be pursued to find out which cryopreservation protocol is best and whether the time has come to completely abandon fresh transfers.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF; embryo cryopreservation; embryo transfer; endometrial receptivity; slow freezing; vitrification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890275     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  67 in total

1.  Slow freezing should not be totally substituted by vitrification when applied to day 3 embryo cryopreservation: an analysis of 5613 frozen cycles.

Authors:  Hai-Yan Zhu; Ya-Mei Xue; Ling-Yun Yang; Ling-Ying Jiang; Chao Ling; Xiao-Mei Tong; Song-Ying Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Euploid embryos selected by an automated time-lapse system have superior SET outcomes than selected solely by conventional morphology assessment.

Authors:  E Rocafort; M Enciso; A Leza; J Sarasa; J Aizpurua
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Supraphysiologic estradiol is an independent predictor of low birth weight in full-term singletons born after fresh embryo transfer.

Authors:  N Pereira; R T Elias; P J Christos; A C Petrini; K Hancock; J P Lekovich; Z Rosenwaks
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Kai Mee Wong; Madelon van Wely; Femke Mol; Sjoerd Repping; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-03-28

5.  Oxidative markers in cryopreservation medium from frozen-thawed embryos: a possible tool for improved embryo selection in in vitro fertilization?

Authors:  Zofnat Wiener-Megnazi; Shirly Lahav-Baratz; Idit Blais; Sarah Matarasso; Mara Koifman; Sergei Shnizer; David Ishai; Gil Peer; Grace Younes; Ariel Zilberlicht; Ron Auslander; Martha Dirnfeld
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Preimplantation genetic screening 2.0: the theory.

Authors:  Joep Geraedts; Karen Sermon
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 7.  Comparison of pregnancy outcomes after vitrification at the cleavage and blastocyst stage: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  MeiFang Zeng; SuQin Su; LiuMing Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Frozen blastocyst transfer outcomes in immediate versus delayed subsequent cycles following GnRH agonist or hCG triggers.

Authors:  Leah Kaye; Audrey Marsidi; Puja Rai; Jeffrey Thorne; John Nulsen; Lawrence Engmann; Claudio Benadiva
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Whole-ovary decellularization generates an effective 3D bioscaffold for ovarian bioengineering.

Authors:  Georgia Pennarossa; Matteo Ghiringhelli; Fulvio Gandolfi; Tiziana A L Brevini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Are extremely high progesterone levels still an issue in IVF?

Authors:  V S Vanni; P Viganò; L Quaranta; L Pagliardini; P Giardina; M Molgora; M Munaretto; M Candiani; E Papaleo
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.