Literature DB >> 24889753

Hepatitis activity should be considered a confounder of liver stiffness measured with MR elastography.

Shintaro Ichikawa1, Utaroh Motosugi, Tadao Nakazawa, Hiroyuki Morisaka, Katsuhiro Sano, Tomoaki Ichikawa, Nobuyuki Enomoto, Masanori Matsuda, Hideki Fujii, Hiroshi Onishi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hepatitis activity on liver stiffness measurements and the role of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in liver fibrosis staging by MR elastography (MRE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured liver stiffness (kPa) in 135 patients by MRE and histologically assessed fibrosis and hepatitis activity within 2 months. Stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to determine the maximum adjusted R(2) against liver stiffness, after adjusting for nothing (model 1), ALT/upper limit of normal categories (model 2), and hepatitis activity (A grade) by METAVIR (model 3). Logistic regression was used to identify independent factors associated with pathologically proven cirrhosis.
RESULTS: Platelet count and METAVIR F score were strongly associated with liver stiffness. The adjusted R(2) value of model 3 (0.7026) was higher than those of models 1 (0.6472) and 2 (0.6564), showing that hepatitis activity affected liver stiffness measurement. High ALT levels (odds ratio, 0.0066; P = 0.0003) as well as MRE (odds ratio, 9.91; P < 0.0001) were independently associated with cirrhosis.
CONCLUSION: Hepatitis activity may be a confounder of liver stiffness measurement during liver fibrosis staging using MRE. MRE can potentially make an overdiagnosis of liver cirrhosis if the patient has high ALT levels.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity of hepatitis; hepatic fibrosis; liver stiffness; magnetic resonance elastography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24889753     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  20 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a diagnostic accuracy systematic review and individual participant data pooled analysis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Rohit Loomba; Zhen Wang; Claude Sirlin; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Frank H Miller; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Edmund M Godfrey; Patrick Asbach; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 3.  Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions.

Authors:  Paul Kennedy; Mathilde Wagner; Laurent Castéra; Cheng William Hong; Curtis L Johnson; Claude B Sirlin; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Rheological determinants for simultaneous staging of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in patients with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Ralph Sinkus; Simon Lambert; Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Caryn Morse; Theo Heller; Christian Guenthner; Ahmed M Ghanem; Sverre Holm; Ahmed M Gharib
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis: MR imaging features vs. MR elastography.

Authors:  Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Meng Yin; Naoki Takahashi; James F Glockner; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance elastography of abdomen.

Authors:  Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2015-04

7.  Hepatic stiffness measurement by using MR elastography: prognostic values after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Jeong Min Lee; Nam-Joon Yi; Kwang-Woong Lee; Kyung-Suk Suh; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Kyung Bun Lee; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography can predict development of hepatocellular carcinoma with longitudinally acquired two-point data.

Authors:  Shintaro Ichikawa; Utaroh Motosugi; Nobuyuki Enomoto; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Zhen Wang; Frank H Miller; Utaroh Motosugi; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Patrick Asbach; Edmund M Godfrey; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Andrew P Keaveny; Mellena Bridges; Anneloes Bohte; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance elastography in liver transplant recipients: A pooled analysis.

Authors:  Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Andrew Keaveny; Sharon Adam; Frank H Miller; Patrick Asbach; Edmund M Godfrey; Alvin C Silva; Zhen Wang; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Sumeet K Asrani; David J Lomas; Richard L Ehman
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.