Literature DB >> 24889146

Epidemiology and outcomes in refractive lens exchange surgery.

Oscar Westin1, Timo Koskela, Anders Behndig.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess demographics and refractive outcomes in patients undergoing refractive lens exchange surgery (RLE), with a population of cataract patients as a reference.
METHODS: A RLE cohort from a private eye clinic (n = 675) and a cataract cohort from the outcome registration of the Swedish National Cataract Register were studied and compared from an epidemiological perspective regarding age, gender, preoperative refraction and postoperative refractive outcome.
RESULTS: The RLE patients were younger (52.1 ± 7.7 versus 73.84 ± 9.32 years) with a smaller percentage of women (45.28% versus 60.46%; p < 0.001) and were more often myopic than the cataract patients. Astigmatism and hyperopia did not differ between the cohorts. Uncorrected visual acuity after RLE equalled the best corrected visual acuity in best cases after cataract surgery. The absolute biometry prediction was more accurate in RLE (0.17 ± 0.27 D versus 0.40 ± 0.58 D; p < 0.001), particularly in patients given a customized toric IOL (0.12 ± 0.27 D; p < 0.05). In cataracts, the Haigis' formula showed higher accuracy than the SRK/T formula (0.39 ± 0.53 D versus 0.43 ± 0.61 D; p < 0.01). Postoperatively after RLE, Laser Epithelial Keratomileusis was performed in 9.04% and Yttrium Aluminium Garnet capsulotomy in 7.41% of the eyes. Other reoperations were performed in three cases, and five postoperative retinal detachments occurred after RLE.
CONCLUSION: Compared with patients undergoing cataract surgery, we see many similarities, but also many interesting differences in patients undergoing RLE. Basic information about the growing population choosing to undergo RLE can help us plan future ophthalmic care.
© 2014 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cataract; complications; refractive lens exchange; refractive outcome; results

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24889146     DOI: 10.1111/aos.12460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  7 in total

Review 1.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction after refractive lens exchange with a single-piece diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  John S M Chang; Jack C M Ng; Vincent K C Chan; Antony K P Law
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs.

Authors:  Kjell G Gundersen; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-08

Review 4.  Global prevalence and economic and humanistic burden of astigmatism in cataract patients: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  David F Anderson; Mukesh Dhariwal; Christine Bouchet; Michael S Keith
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-06

5.  Evaluation of Different Power of Near Addition in Two Different Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Ugur Unsal; Gonen Baser
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Refractive lens exchange in younger and older presbyopes: comparison of complication rates, 3 months clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Steven C Schallhorn; Julie M Schallhorn; Martina Pelouskova; Jan A Venter; Keith A Hettinger; Stephen J Hannan; David Teenan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-28

7.  Presbyopia Treatment With Eye Drops: An Eight Year Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Giovanna Benozzi; Cristian Perez; Juliana Leiro; Sonia Facal; Betina Orman
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.283

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.