| Literature DB >> 24886504 |
Shudong Yu, Fenye Liu, Zhixin Cheng, Qirong Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increasing recent evidence has implicated osteoporosis as a risk factor for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). We conducted a systematic review to examine the association between osteoporosis and BPPV.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24886504 PMCID: PMC4039044 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Figure 1Flow chart depicting the method of study selection.
Summary of the seven studies that investigated the association between osteoporosis (osteopenia) and BPPV
| Vibert 2003 [ | 50 to 85(69 ± 9.2) | 32(BPPV):83(Healthy controls) | Case–control study | All were Female | BMD | The apparent correlation between BPPV and osteopenia or osteoporosis |
| Jang2009 [ | 20 to 69 | 78(BPPV):117 (Healthy controls) | Cohort studies | All were Female | BMD, The number of canalith repositioning maneuvers, The presence of recurrence | Patients with BPPV had lower BMD values compared with control subjects, and patients with low BMD values showed a significant increase in the number of canalith repositioning maneuvers required and the recurrence rate |
| Jeong2009 [ | 29 to 90 years (59.8 ± 12.5 in test group, 56.3 ± 8.6 in control group) | 209(BPPV):202(Healthy controls) | Case–control study | Female: Male in BPPV Group (142:67), in Control (96:106) | BMD | Decreased BMD score both in women and in men with BBPV, compared with that in controls. |
| Mikulec2010 [ | 51 to 80 | 143(BPPV):117(Controls that with symmetric sensorineural hearing loss and without known vestibular problems) | Case–control study | All were Female | The presence or absence of osteoporosis | There was a negative association between BPPV and treated osteoporosis in women aged 51 to 60 years, and a trend towards a negative association for women aged 61–70 years and for the group as a whole. Osteoporosis, or the medication used to treat it, may provide protection against BPPV. |
| Yamanaka2013 [ | 50 to 88 (63.7 ± 7.40) | 39(Recurrence free): 9 (Single recurrence):13(Multiple recurrence) | Case–control study | All were Female | BMD | Osteoporosis is a risk factor for BPPV recurrence. The prognosis of BPPV might be clinically predicted by BMD reduction. |
| Parham2013 [ | 49 to 81 (66.9 ± 1.8) | 16(BPPV):13(osteopenia/osteoporosis) | Cohort studies | All were Female | BMD. Calcium, Vit D, 25(OH)D3, and Serum Markers of Bone Turnover (sNTX, P1NP) | Postmenopausal women with BPPV have a high prevalence of osteopenia/osteoporosis, and postmenopausal women with osteopenia/osteoporosis have higher than expected prevalence of BPPV. Levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover correlate with presence of BPPV but not Ca or Vit D. |
| Stefano2013 [ | 65 to 95(72.9 ± 6.14) | 1092(BPPV):13(BPPV with osteopenia/osteoporosis) | Multicenter Case–control study | Female: Male(685:407) | Risk of recurrence | Combine with two or more comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, osteoarthrosis), osteoporosis further increases the risk of relapsing BPPV |
SD standard deviation; BMD bone mineral density; CRP canalith-repositioning maneuvers, sNTX amino-terminal telopeptides of collagen; P1NP amino-terminal propeptide of protocollagen type I.
Methodological quality assessment of cohort studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
| SELECTION | | |
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | ☆ | ☆ |
| Selection of the non-exposed cohort | ☆ | ☆ |
| Ascertainment of exposure | ☆ | ☆ |
| Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | ☆ | ☆ |
| COMPARABILITY | | |
| Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | ☆ | ☆ |
| EXPOSURE | | |
| Ascertainment of exposure | ☆ | ☆ |
| Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur | | |
| Adequacy of follow up of cohorts | | |
| Total number of star | 5 | 5 |
Study quality was graded as poor (1–3 stars), intermediate (4–6 stars) or high (7–9 stars).
Methodological quality assessment of case–control studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale
| SELECTION | | | | | |
| Is the case definition adequate? | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Representativeness of the cases | | ☆ | ☆ | | ☆ |
| Selection of controls | | | | | |
| Definition of controls | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| COMPARABILITY | | | | | |
| Comparability of cases and controls on the basis of the design or analysis | ☆☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆☆ |
| EXPOSURE | | | | | |
| Ascertainment of exposure | ☆ | ☆ | | ☆ | ☆ |
| Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ |
| Non-response rate | | | | | |
| Total number of star | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
Study quality was graded as poor (1–3 stars), intermediate (4–6 stars) or high (7–9 stars).