| Literature DB >> 24886380 |
Changqing Yu, Qingkai Yan, Chunjiang Fu, Weibin Shi, Hongyong Wang, Chunyu Zeng, Xukai Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between CYP4F2 gene polymorphism and coronary heart disease (CHD) in a Chinese Han population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24886380 PMCID: PMC4052825 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-83
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Primers and PCR conditions of four SNPs
| rs2108622 | F: 5’-ATCAACCCGTTCCCACCT-3’ | Pvu II | 55 |
| R: 5’-ACATTGTGCTCCCAGACG-3’ | |||
| rs3093100 | F: 5’-AGTGCTTACTAGGGAACTGGAG-3’ | Apa I | 54 |
| R: 5’-AAGGATTCAATGCAGGCCTGGA-3’ | |||
| rs3093105 | F: 5’-AGCCCTCCCTGCTCTACCT-3’ | Eae I | 56 |
| R:5’-CCCACTCCCTAAGCCTCGT-3’; | |||
| rs3093135 | F : 5’-GGCAGGCAGTCATCCACA-3’ | Hinf I | 52 |
| R: 5’-CCAAACAGGCCCTCACAT-3’ |
Characteristics of the participants population
| CHD group | 440 | 58.6 ± 13.5 | 25.2 ± 3.4 | 143.6 ± 21.1 | 88.1 ± 16.4 | 148 (33.6) | 139 (31.6) | 105 (23.9) | 7.4 ± 3.6 | 3.1 ± 1.8 | 5.5 ± 2.2 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 2.6 ± 1.4 |
| Control group | 440 | 58.5 ± 13.2 | 24.9 ± 3.5 | 124.2 ± 13.5 | 78.2 ± 13.2 | 64 (14.5) | 66 (15.0) | 75 (17.0) | 4.6 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 2.4 ± 0.9 |
| 0.322 | 0.053 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.114 | 0.123 |
Note: BMI: Body Mass Index; SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP: Diastolic Blood pressure; GLU: Glucose; TG: Triglycerides; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL-C: High-density Lipoprotein-C; LDL-C: Low-density Lipoprotein-C.
Distributions of CYP4F2 genotypes (N = 440)
| rs2108622 | A/G | Case | 34(0.077) | 168(0.382) | 238(0.541) | 0.048 | 236(0.268) | 644(0.732) | 0.773(0.629 ~ 0.949) | 0.011 |
| | | Control | 46(0.105) | 191(0.434) | 203(0.461) | | 283(0.322) | 597(0.678) | ||
| rs3093100 | C/G | Case | 7(0.016) | 94(0.214) | 339(0.770) | 0.482 | 108(0.123) | 772(0.877) | 0.877(0.664 ~ 1.158) | 0.357 |
| | | Control | 12(0.027) | 97(0.220) | 331(0.752) | | 121(0.138) | 759(0.863) | ||
| rs3093105 | T/G | Case | 22(0.050) | 117(0.266) | 301(0.684) | 0.003 | 161(0.183) | 719(0.817) | 1.617(1.241 ~ 2.107) | <0.001 |
| | | Control | 10(0.023) | 87(0.198) | 343(0.780) | | 107(0.122) | 773(0.878) | ||
| rs3093135 | A/T | Case: | 12(0.027) | 93(0.211) | 335(0.761) | 0.654 | 117(0.133) | 763(0.867) | 0.876(0.670 ~ 1.147) | 0.337 |
| Control: | 15(0.034) | 101(0.230) | 324(0.736) | 131(0.149) | 749(0.851) | |||||
Figure 1Genetic variation at human CYP4F2 gene. Using the SHEsis software, we calculated the Linkage disequilibrium (LD) value between each SNP. A: LD value shown: |D’| × 100; |D’| colour scheme: |D’| <0.5: white; 0.5 < r 2 < 1: shades of Pink; |D’| = 1: red; B: LD value shown: r 2 × 100; r 2 colour scheme: r 2 < 0.5: white; 0.5 < r 2 < 1: shades of grey; r 2 = 1: black.
Haplotype distribution between case and control
| A C T T | 108.00(0.123) | 121.00(0.137) | 0.310 | 0.866 | 0.656 ~ 1.144 |
| A G T T | 128.00(0.145) | 152.00(0.173) | 0.095 | 0.804 | 0.622 ~ 1.039 |
| G G G A | 114.85(0.131) | 86.11(0.098) | 0.058 | 1.366 | 1.016 ~ 1.838 |
| G G G T | 46.14(0.052) | 10.89(0.012) | <0.001 | 4.367 | 2.241 ~ 8.510 |
| G G T A | 21.4(0.020) | 44.89(0.051) | <0.001 | 0.450 | 0.111 ~ 0.777 |