| Literature DB >> 24884776 |
Haitao Li, Baodong Xie, Chengxiong Gu, Mingxin Gao, Fan Zhang, Jiayang Wang, Longsheng Dai, Yang Yu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: End-to-side anastomoses to connect the distal end of the great saphenous vein (GSV) to small target coronary arteries are commonly performed in sequential coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the oversize diameter ratio between the GSV and small target vessels at end-to-side anastomoses might induce adverse hemodynamic condition. The purpose of this study was to describe a distal end side-to-side anastomosis technique and retrospectively compare the effect of distal end side-to-side versus end-to-side anastomosis on graft flow characteristics.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24884776 PMCID: PMC4023697 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-14-65
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Patient characteristic
| 30 | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19 | 63.3% | |
| 11 | 36.7% | |
| 68 ± 3.6 (63–73) | | |
| 16 | 53.3% | |
| 20 | 66.7% | |
| | | |
| 0 | 0 | |
| 8 | 26.7% | |
| 13 | 43.3% | |
| 9 | 30% |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of distal end side-to-side anastomoses and end-to-side anastomoses. A. Schematic diagram of distal end side-to-side anastomoses. i. The GSV was side-to-side anastomosed to the target coronary artery by Prolene 8–0 or 9–0 sutures. ii. The extra GSV segment was subsequently cut starting from the toe of the anastomosis at 45-degree angle toward the anastomosis. iii. The distal end of GSV was sealed with Prolene 7–0. B. Schematic diagram of end-to-side anastomoses.
Comparison of the graft flow characteristics between end-to-side (ETS) and side-to-side (STS) anastomoses at the distal end of the GSV
| 1 | 2/10 | 36/48 | 18.2/2.2 | 5.4/3.1 |
| 2 | 7/35 | 64/97 | 7.1/0.9 | 4.7/2.4 |
| 3 | 3/13 | 47/59 | 12.6/3.7 | 5.1/3.7 |
| 4 | 5/26 | 58/86 | 13.4/2.8 | 3.8/3.1 |
| 5 | 8/22 | 39/68 | 9.3/1.7 | 2.7/2.1 |
| 6 | 2/12 | 40/60 | 15.6/0.9 | 3.5/2.8 |
| 7 | 5/10 | 57/72 | 8.3/1.3 | 4.0/3.2 |
| 8 | 5/27 | 55/87 | 11.8/2.4 | 2.4/1.9 |
| 9 | 9/30 | 60/89 | 7.9/1.7 | 3.9/3.1 |
| 10 | 4/25 | 49/68 | 10.2/3.0 | 4.7/4.3 |
| 11 | 5/18 | 30/48 | 15.2/4.2 | 2.8/2.9 |
| 12 | 2/12 | 43/49 | 8.5/2.7 | 3.6/3.4 |
| 13 | 3/32 | 32/70 | 9.7/2.0 | 3.4/3.1 |
| 14 | 10/18 | 37/50 | 10.6/1.2 | 2.9/2.6 |
| Mean ± SD | 5.00 ± 2.63/20.71 ± 8.60* | 46.21 ± 11.10/67.93 ± 16.68* | 11.31 ± 3.30/2.19 ± 1.01* | 3.78 ± 0.93/2.98 ± 0.62# |
*P < 0.0001 STS vs. ETS. #P =0.0102 STS vs. ETS.