| Literature DB >> 24884680 |
Ruthaiwan Bunkrongcheap, Nongporn Hutadilok-Towatana1, Kusumarn Noipha, Chatchai Wattanapiromsakul, Masashi Inafuku, Hirosuke Oku.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis L. Voigt) is a tropical plant widely distributed throughout Asia, Africa, and the Pacific Islands. The anti-obesity property of this plant has been claimed but still remains to be scientifically proven. We therefore investigated the effects of ivy gourd leaf, stem, and root on adipocyte differentiation by employing cell culture model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24884680 PMCID: PMC4064515 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-13-88
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1Effects of an ethanol extract from different parts of ivy gourd on intracellular lipid accumulation and cell viability. Results are given as a mean value ± S.D. of six-replicate measurements. Bar graphs represent the relative intracellular lipid contents. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL). Percentages of cell viability are shown as a line graph. Crosses indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL). The standard TNFα at 10 ng/mL gave 5.00 ± 1.74% of relative lipid content in these experiments.
Figure 2Effects of the root extract at different treatment times on the accumulation of intracellular lipid. The relative amounts of accumulated lipid are shown as a mean value ± S.D. of five-replicate measurements for each period that the extract (100 μg/mL) was present in the culture medium. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL) at Day 8.
Figure 3Effects of hexane fraction from the root extract on the intracellular lipid accumulation and cell viability. (A) Results are a mean value ± S.D. of six-replicate measurements. Bar graphs represent the relative intracellular lipid contents. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL). Percentages of cell viability are shown as a line graph. Crosses indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL). The standard TNFα at 10 ng/mL gave 9.17 ± 3.98% of relative lipid content in these experiments. (B) The relative amounts of accumulated lipid are shown as a mean value ± S.D. of five-replicate measurements for each period that the fraction (1,000 μg/mL) was present in the culture medium. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL) at Day 8.
Figure 4Effects of hexane fraction on the expression of lipid metabolism-related genes in 3T3-L1 cells. The cells were cultured in the presence of an ethanol vehicle only (); the hexane fraction at 500 μg/mL (); the hexane fraction at 1,000 μg/mL () during the differentiation induction period (Day 0-Day 2). All cells were harvested at Day 2 to determine the mRNA levels of the interested genes. Their relative expression levels were estimated in terms of their fold-change compared to the β-actin mRNA. Values are shown as a mean value ± S.D. of three-replicateexperimentsfor each treatment. Asterisks indicate a significant difference at p <0.05 from the untreated control (0 μg/mL). (ND = non-differentiated 3T3-L1 cells).
Figure 5Proposed molecular mechanisms for the inhibition of adipogenesis by ivy gourd root. The active constituent(s) in ivy gourd root when introduced to 3T3-L1 cells during the induction of differentiation blocks PPARγ and C/EBPα expressions directly leading to a negative regulation of various adipogenic genes, and eventually inhibits adipogenesis in these cells.
Primer sequences for Real-Time PCR
| Actin | 5′-CAGAAGGAGATTACTGCTCTGGCT-3′ | NM_007393 |
| (93 bp) | 5′-GGAGCCACCGATCCACACA-3′ | |
| ACC | 5′-GGACCACTGCATGGAATGTTAA-3′ | AY451393 |
| (73 bp) | 5′-TGAGTGACTGCCGAAACATCTC-3′ | |
| Adiponectin | 5′-GTTCCCAATGTACCCATTCGC-3′ | NM_009605 |
| (88 bp) | 5′-TGTTGCAGTAGAACTTGCCAG-3′ | |
| Adipor1 | 5′-TCTTCGGGATGTTCTTCCTGG-3′ | NM_028320 |
| (104 bp) | 5′-TTTGGAAAAAGTCCGAGAGACC-3′ | |
| C/EBPα | 5′-TGGACAAGAACAGCAACGAGTAC-3′ | AM_007678 |
| (257 bp) | 5′-GCAGTTGCCCATGGCCTTGAC-3′ | |
| FABP4 | 5′-AGCATCATAACCCTAGATGG-3′ | NM_024406.2 |
| (115 bp) | 5′-CATAACACATTCCACCACCAGC-3′ | |
| FAS | 5′- TGCTCCCAGCTGCAGGC -3′ | AF_127033 |
| (91 bp) | 5′-GCCCGGTAGCTCTGGGTGTA-3′ | |
| GLUT4 | 5′-CTGCAAAGCGTAGGTACCAA-3′ | BC014282 |
| (87 bp) | 5′-CCTCCCGCCCTTAGTTG-3′ | |
| IRS1 | 5′-CCAGAGTCAAGCCTCACACA-3′ | NM_010570.4 |
| (179 bp) | 5′-GAAGACTGCTGCTGCTGTTG-3′ | |
| LPL | 5′-AGGGCTCTGCCTGAGTTGTA-3′ | NM_008509 |
| (199 bp) | 5′-AGAAATCTCGAAGGCCTGGT-3′ | |
| MEST | 5′-GTTTTTCACCTACAAAGGCCTACG-3′ | NM_008590 |
| (52 bp) | 5′-CACACCGACAGAATCTTGGTAGAA-3′ | |
| PDK4 | 5′-GAGAAGAGCCCAGAAGACCA-3′ | NM_013743 |
| (134 bp) | 5′-TCCACTGTGCAGGTGTCTTT-3′ | |
| PPARγ | 5′-AGGCCGAGAAGGAGAAGCTGTTG-3′ | NM_011146 |
| (276 BP) | 5′-TGGCCACCTCTTTGCTGTGCTC-3′ | |
| PPARγ1 | 5′-AAGATTTGAAAGAAGCGGTGAAC-3′ | NM_001127330 |
| (116 bp) | 5′-CAATGGCCATGAGGGAGTTAG-3′ | |
| SIRT1 | 5′-GACGACGAGGGCGAGGAG-3′ | NM_019812 |
| (79 bp) | 5′-ACAGGAGGTTGTCTCGGTAGC-3′ |
ACC, acetyl-CoA carboxylase; Actin, cytoplasmic β-actin; Adipor1, adiponectin receptor-1; C/EBPα, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein transcription factor-α; FABP4, fatty acid binding protein-4; FAS, fatty acid synthase; GLUT4, glucose transporter-4; IRS1, insulin receptor substrate-1; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; MEST, mesoderm specific transcript; PDK4, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ; PPARγ1, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ1; SIRT1, sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog)-1; bp, base pairs.