Literature DB >> 24882812

Bioattractors: dynamical systems theory and the evolution of regulatory processes.

Johannes Jaeger1, Nick Monk2.   

Abstract

In this paper, we illustrate how dynamical systems theory can provide a unifying conceptual framework for evolution of biological regulatory systems. Our argument is that the genotype-phenotype map can be characterized by the phase portrait of the underlying regulatory process. The features of this portrait--such as attractors with associated basins and their bifurcations--define the regulatory and evolutionary potential of a system. We show how the geometric analysis of phase space connects Waddington's epigenetic landscape to recent computational approaches for the study of robustness and evolvability in network evolution. We discuss how the geometry of phase space determines the probability of possible phenotypic transitions. Finally, we demonstrate how the active, self-organizing role of the environment in phenotypic evolution can be understood in terms of dynamical systems concepts. This approach yields mechanistic explanations that go beyond insights based on the simulation of evolving regulatory networks alone. Its predictions can now be tested by studying specific, experimentally tractable regulatory systems using the tools of modern systems biology. A systematic exploration of such systems will enable us to understand better the nature and origin of the phenotypic variability, which provides the substrate for evolution by natural selection.
© 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Physiology © 2014 The Physiological Society.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24882812      PMCID: PMC4048087          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.272385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  44 in total

1.  Conrad Hal Waddington: the last Renaissance biologist?

Authors:  Jonathan M W Slack
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Developmental constraints in a comparative framework: a test case using variations in phalanx number during amniote evolution.

Authors:  Michael K Richardson; Ariel D Chipman
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 3.  Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms.

Authors:  H Frederik Nijhout
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  A proposal for using the ensemble approach to understand genetic regulatory networks.

Authors:  Stuart Kauffman
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-10-21       Impact factor: 2.691

Review 5.  Genotype-phenotype mapping and the end of the 'genes as blueprint' metaphor.

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Phenotypic plasticity in development and evolution: facts and concepts. Introduction.

Authors:  Giuseppe Fusco; Alessandro Minelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Mutational robustness can facilitate adaptation.

Authors:  Jeremy A Draghi; Todd L Parsons; Günter P Wagner; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Size regulation in the segmentation of Drosophila: interacting interfaces between localized domains of gene expression ensure robust spatial patterning.

Authors:  Sergei Vakulenko; John Reinitz; Ovidiu Radulescu
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 9.161

9.  Canalization of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm by gap gene cross regulation.

Authors:  Svetlana Surkova; Alexander V Spirov; Vitaly V Gursky; Hilde Janssens; Ah-Ram Kim; Ovidiu Radulescu; Carlos E Vanario-Alonso; David H Sharp; Maria Samsonova; John Reinitz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Classification of transient behaviours in a time-dependent toggle switch model.

Authors:  Berta Verd; Anton Crombach; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-04-04
View more
  31 in total

1.  Critical Timing without a Timer for Embryonic Development.

Authors:  Daniel E Tufcea; Paul François
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Surviving evolutionary escape on complex genotype-phenotype networks.

Authors:  Esther Ibáñez-Marcelo; Tomás Alarcón
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 3.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evolution evolves: physiology returns to centre stage.

Authors:  Denis Noble; Eva Jablonka; Michael J Joyner; Gerd B Müller; Stig W Omholt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Nonlinear change processes and the emergence of suicidal behavior: a conceptual model based on the fluid vulnerability theory of suicide.

Authors:  Craig J Bryan; Jonathan E Butner; Alexis M May; Kelsi F Rugo; Julia Harris; D Nicolas Oakey; David C Rozek; AnnaBelle O Bryan
Journal:  New Ideas Psychol       Date:  2020-04

6.  The genotype-phenotype distinction: from Mendelian genetics to 21st century biology.

Authors:  Gaëlle Pontarotti; Matteo Mossio; Arnaud Pocheville
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 1.633

7.  The origin of RNA interference: Adaptive or neutral evolution?

Authors:  Alessandro Torri; Johannes Jaeger; Thomas Pradeu; Maria-Carla Saleh
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 9.593

8.  Rethinking Causation for Data-intensive Biology: Constraints, Cancellations, and Quantized Organisms: Causality in complex organisms is sculpted by constraints rather than instigators, with outcomes perhaps better described by quantized patterns than rectilinear pathways.

Authors:  Douglas E Brash
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 4.345

9.  Homology of process: developmental dynamics in comparative biology.

Authors:  James DiFrisco; Johannes Jaeger
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  Geometric models for robust encoding of dynamical information into embryonic patterns.

Authors:  Laurent Jutras-Dubé; Ezzat El-Sherif; Paul François
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 8.713

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.