Literature DB >> 24881863

Biomechanical properties of the thoracic aneurysmal wall: differences between bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve patients.

Caroline Forsell1, Hanna M Björck2, Per Eriksson2, Anders Franco-Cereceda3, T Christian Gasser4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence for thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is significantly increased in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) compared with patients who have a normal tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). TAA rupture is a life-threatening event, and biomechanics-based simulations of the aorta may help to disentangle the molecular mechanism behind its development and progression. The present study used polarized microscopy and macroscopic in vitro tensile testing to explore collagen organization and mechanical properties of TAA wall specimens from BAV and TAV patients.
METHODS: Circumferential sections of aneurysmal aortic tissue from BAV and TAV patients were obtained during elective operations. The distribution of collagen orientation was captured by a Bingham distribution, and finite element models were used to estimate constitutive model parameters from experimental load-displacement curves.
RESULTS: Collagen orientation was almost identical in BAV and TAV patients, with a highest probability of alignment along the circumferential direction. The strength was almost two times higher in BAV samples (0.834 MPa) than in TAV samples (0.443 MPa; p<0.001). The collagen-related stiffness (Cf) was significantly increased in BAV compared with TAV patients (Cf=7.45 MPa vs 3.40 MPa; p=0.003), whereas the elastin-related stiffness was similar in both groups. A trend toward a decreased wall thickness was seen in BAV patients (p=0.058).
CONCLUSIONS: The aneurysmal aortas of BAV patients show a higher macroscopic strength, mainly due to an increased collagen-related stiffness, compared with TAV patients. The increased wall stiffness in BAV patients may contribute to the higher prevalence for TAAs in this group.
Copyright © 2014 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24881863     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  22 in total

1.  Abnormal aortic stiffness in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: phenotypic variation determined by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Thananya Boonyasirinant; Prabhakar Rajiah; Scott D Flamm
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Computational modeling of the strength of the ascending thoracic aortic media tissue under physiologic biaxial loading conditions.

Authors:  Spandan Maiti; James R Thunes; Ronald N Fortunato; Thomas G Gleason; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Aortic valve-mediated wall shear stress is heterogeneous and predicts regional aortic elastic fiber thinning in bicuspid aortic valve-associated aortopathy.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; David G Guzzardi; Samaneh Sattari; Katherine E Olsen; Elena S Di Martino; S Chris Malaisrie; Pim van Ooij; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Patrick M McCarthy; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Wall shear stress versus wall tensile stress: Two important biomechanical metrics.

Authors:  Thomas G Gleason
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Structural modeling reveals microstructure-strength relationship for human ascending thoracic aorta.

Authors:  James R Thunes; Julie A Phillippi; Thomas G Gleason; David A Vorp; Spandan Maiti
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 6.  Bicuspid aortic valve related aortopathy.

Authors:  Sina Stock; Salah A Mohamed; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-30

Review 7.  Year in review: bicuspid aortopathy.

Authors:  Paul W M Fedak; Alex J Barker; Subodh Verma
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms based on a novel probabilistic rupture risk index.

Authors:  Stanislav Polzer; T Christian Gasser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-12-06       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  A structural finite element model for lamellar unit of aortic media indicates heterogeneous stress field after collagen recruitment.

Authors:  James R Thunes; Siladitya Pal; Ronald N Fortunato; Julie A Phillippi; Thomas G Gleason; David A Vorp; Spandan Maiti
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy: Full online-only version.

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Paul W M Fedak; Elizabeth H Stephens; Thomas G Gleason; Evaldas Girdauskas; John S Ikonomidis; Ali Khoynezhad; Samuel C Siu; Subodh Verma; Michael D Hope; Duke E Cameron; Donald F Hammer; Joseph S Coselli; Marc R Moon; Thoralf M Sundt; Alex J Barker; Michael Markl; Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.