Literature DB >> 24881556

The rm2 metrics and regression through origin approach: reliable and useful validation tools for predictive QSAR models (Commentary on 'Is regression through origin useful in external validation of QSAR models?').

Kunal Roy1, Supratik Kar2.   

Abstract

Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) is an in silico technique which can be used in drug discovery, environmental fate modeling, property and toxicity prediction of chemical entities and regulatory toxicology. The predictive potential of a QSAR model is judged from various validation metrics in order to evaluate how well it is capable to predict endpoint values of new untested compounds. The rm2 group of metrics is one of the stringent validation metrics currently used by the QSAR fraternity in different reports. We scrutinized a recently published paper which raised an issue that the constructed criteria based on regression through origin (RTO) are not optimal and there is a significant difference in the rm2 metrics values computed from different statistical software packages. According to our point of view, the conclusion drawn in this paper appears to be misleading. Any inconsistency in the software algorithms has nothing to do with the calculation of rm2 metrics, as such computation is not limited by the use of any specific software, rather it depends only on fundamental mathematical formulae that are well established. However, it is a concern to the QSAR users that Excel and SPSS can return different results for the metrics using the RTO method. Thus, a proper validation of the software tool is required before its use for computation of any validation metric.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External validation; QSAR; Regression through origin; r(m)(2) Metrics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24881556     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0928-0987            Impact factor:   4.384


  5 in total

1.  Beware of R(2): Simple, Unambiguous Assessment of the Prediction Accuracy of QSAR and QSPR Models.

Authors:  D L J Alexander; A Tropsha; David A Winkler
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.956

2.  QSAR models of antiproliferative activity of imidazo[2,1-b][1,3,4]thiadiazoles in various cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Joanna Matysiak; Andrzej Niewiadomy
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.943

3.  Two- and three-dimensional QSAR studies on hURAT1 inhibitors with flexible linkers: topomer CoMFA and HQSAR.

Authors:  Tingting Zhao; Zean Zhao; Fengting Lu; Shan Chang; Jiajie Zhang; Jianxin Pang; Yuanxin Tian
Journal:  Mol Divers       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.943

4.  A regression-based QSAR-model to predict acute toxicity of aromatic chemicals in tadpoles of the Japanese brown frog (Rana japonica): Calibration, validation, and future developments to support risk assessment of chemicals in amphibians.

Authors:  Andrey A Toropov; Matteo R Di Nicola; Alla P Toropova; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Nynke I Kramer; Antony J Williams; Manuel E Ortiz-Santaliestra; Emilio Benfenati; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 10.753

5.  Monte Carlo Method and GA-MLR-Based QSAR Modeling of NS5A Inhibitors against the Hepatitis C Virus.

Authors:  Wissal Liman; Mehdi Oubahmane; Ismail Hdoufane; Imane Bjij; Didier Villemin; Rachid Daoud; Driss Cherqaoui; Achraf El Allali
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.927

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.