Sarah M Eickmeyer1, Christine K Walczak2, Katherine B Myers3, D Richard Lindstrom4, Peter Layde5, Bruce H Campbell6. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI∗. Electronic address: seickmeyer@mcw.edu. 2. Rehabilitation Services, Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI† 3. Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI‡ 4. Osler Medical Ear, Nose and Throat Specialty Practice, Melbourne, FL§ 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI|| 6. Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI¶
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of neck dissection and radiation treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) with subsequent shoulder range of motion (ROM) and quality of life (QOL) in 5-year survivors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional convenience sample. SETTING: Otolaryngology clinics at tertiary care hospital and Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Five-year, disease-free survivors of HNC. METHODS: Demographic and cancer treatment information was collected, including type of neck dissection (none, spinal accessory "nerve sparing," and "nerve sacrificing") and radiation. QOL questionnaires were administered, and shoulder ROM was measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Head and Neck, and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck. Shoulder ROM measurements included abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, internal and external rotation. RESULTS: One hundred and five survivors completed QOL surveys; 85 survivors underwent additional shoulder ROM evaluations. The nerve sacrifice group exhibited significantly poorer scores for UWQOL measures of disfigurement, level of activity, recreation and/or entertainment, speech and shoulder disability, and willingness to eat in public, FACT functional well-being, and FACT Head and Neck (P < .05). Shoulder ROM for flexion and abduction was poorest in the nerve sacrifice group (P < .05). Radiation was associated with significantly worse UWQOL swallowing (P < .05), but no other differences were found for QOL or ROM measurements. Decreased QOL scores were associated with decreased shoulder flexion and abduction (P < .05). Survivors with decreased shoulder abduction had significantly (P < .05) worse scores in disfigurement, recreation and/or entertainment, employment, shoulder disability, and FACT emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Sparing the spinal accessory nerve during neck dissection is associated with significantly less long-term shoulder disability in 5-year survivors of HNC. QOL measures demonstrated the highest level of function in the no dissection group, an intermediate level of functioning with nerve sparing, and poorest function when the nerve is sacrificed. Decreased shoulder flexion and abduction is associated with reduced QOL in long-term survivors of HNC.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of neck dissection and radiation treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) with subsequent shoulder range of motion (ROM) and quality of life (QOL) in 5-year survivors. DESIGN: A cross-sectional convenience sample. SETTING: Otolaryngology clinics at tertiary care hospital and Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Five-year, disease-free survivors of HNC. METHODS: Demographic and cancer treatment information was collected, including type of neck dissection (none, spinal accessory "nerve sparing," and "nerve sacrificing") and radiation. QOL questionnaires were administered, and shoulder ROM was measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: University of Washington Quality of Life (UWQOL), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Head and Neck, and Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck. Shoulder ROM measurements included abduction, adduction, flexion, extension, internal and external rotation. RESULTS: One hundred and five survivors completed QOL surveys; 85 survivors underwent additional shoulder ROM evaluations. The nerve sacrifice group exhibited significantly poorer scores for UWQOL measures of disfigurement, level of activity, recreation and/or entertainment, speech and shoulder disability, and willingness to eat in public, FACT functional well-being, and FACT Head and Neck (P < .05). Shoulder ROM for flexion and abduction was poorest in the nerve sacrifice group (P < .05). Radiation was associated with significantly worse UWQOL swallowing (P < .05), but no other differences were found for QOL or ROM measurements. Decreased QOL scores were associated with decreased shoulder flexion and abduction (P < .05). Survivors with decreased shoulder abduction had significantly (P < .05) worse scores in disfigurement, recreation and/or entertainment, employment, shoulder disability, and FACT emotional well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Sparing the spinal accessory nerve during neck dissection is associated with significantly less long-term shoulder disability in 5-year survivors of HNC. QOL measures demonstrated the highest level of function in the no dissection group, an intermediate level of functioning with nerve sparing, and poorest function when the nerve is sacrificed. Decreased shoulder flexion and abduction is associated with reduced QOL in long-term survivors of HNC.
Authors: Merian van Wouwe; Remco de Bree; Dirk J Kuik; Cees J T de Goede; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; Patricia Doornaert; C René Leemans Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2008-12-04 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Caroline M Speksnijder; Andries van der Bilt; Margot Slappendel; Anton de Wijer; Matthias A W Merkx; Ron Koole Journal: Head Neck Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Martijn M Stuiver; Cornelis P van Wilgen; Erlijn M de Boer; Cees J T de Goede; Muriel Koolstra; Anita van Opzeeland; Piet Venema; Margriet W Sterken; Andrew Vincent; Pieter U Dijkstra Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Michael K Ghiam; Kyle Mannion; Mary S Dietrich; Kristen L Stevens; Jill Gilbert; Barbara A Murphy Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Soon-Hyun Ahn; Hyun Jun Hong; Soon Young Kwon; Kee Hwan Kwon; Jong-Lyel Roh; Junsun Ryu; Jun Hee Park; Seung-Kuk Baek; Guk Haeng Lee; Sei Young Lee; Jin Choon Lee; Man Ki Chung; Young Hoon Joo; Yong Bae Ji; Jeong Hun Hah; Minsu Kwon; Young Min Park; Chang Myeon Song; Sung-Chan Shin; Chang Hwan Ryu; Doh Young Lee; Young Chan Lee; Jae Won Chang; Ha Min Jeong; Jae-Keun Cho; Wonjae Cha; Byung Joon Chun; Ik Joon Choi; Hyo Geun Choi; Kang Dae Lee Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Janet H Van Cleave; Mei R Fu; Antonia V Bennett; Mark S Persky; Zujun Li; Adam Jacobson; Kenneth S Hu; Allison Most; Catherine Concert; Maria Kamberi; Jacqueline Mojica; Amanda Peyser; Ann Riccobene; Anh Tran; Michael J Persky; Justin Savitski; Eva Liang; Brian L Egleston Journal: Mhealth Date: 2019-07-29
Authors: Allen L Feng; Hassan B Nasser; Andrew J Rosko; Keith A Casper; Kelly M Malloy; Chaz L Stucken; Mark E Prince; Steven B Chinn; Matthew E Spector Journal: Plast Aesthet Res Date: 2021-02-25