Literature DB >> 23756434

Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes.

Julie K Silver1, Jennifer Baima.   

Abstract

Cancer prehabilitation, a process on the continuum of care that occurs between the time of cancer diagnosis and the beginning of acute treatment, includes physical and psychological assessments that establish a baseline functional level, identifies impairments, and provides targeted interventions that improve a patient's health to reduce the incidence and the severity of current and future impairments. There is a growing body of scientific evidence that supports preparing newly diagnosed cancer patients for and optimizing their health before starting acute treatments. This is the first review of cancer prehabilitation, and the purpose was to describe early studies in the noncancer population and then the historical focus in cancer patients on aerobic conditioning and building strength and stamina through an appropriate exercise regimen. More recent research shows that opportunities exist to use other unimodal or multimodal prehabilitation interventions to decrease morbidity, improve physical and psychological health outcomes, increase the number of potential treatment options, decrease hospital readmissions, and reduce both direct and indirect healthcare costs attributed to cancer. Future research may demonstrate increased compliance with acute cancer treatment protocols and, therefore, improved survival outcomes. New studies suggest that a multimodal approach that incorporates both physical and psychological prehabilitation interventions may be more effective than a unimodal approach that addresses just one or the other. In an impairment-driven cancer rehabilitation model, identifying current and anticipating future impairments are the critical first steps in improving healthcare outcomes and decreasing costs. More research is urgently needed to evaluate the most effective prehabilitation interventions, and combinations thereof, for survivors of all types of cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23756434     DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31829b4afe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0894-9115            Impact factor:   2.159


  105 in total

Review 1.  Cancer rehabilitation and palliative care: critical components in the delivery of high-quality oncology services.

Authors:  Julie K Silver; Vishwa S Raj; Jack B Fu; Eric M Wisotzky; Sean Robinson Smith; Rebecca A Kirch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comprehensive geriatric assessment in the older cancer patient: coming of age in clinical cancer care.

Authors:  Cynthia Owusu; Nathan A Berger
Journal:  Clin Pract (Lond)       Date:  2014

3.  Physical decline and its implications in the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Linda O'Neill; Jonathan Moran; Emer M Guinan; John V Reynolds; Juliette Hussey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score Predicts Outcomes of Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer in the Elderly.

Authors:  Satoshi Suzuki; Shingo Kanaji; Masashi Yamamoto; Taro Oshikiri; Tetsu Nakamura; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology.

Authors:  Clarice Y Tang; Monica Turczyniak; Alesha Sayner; Kimberley Haines; Sally Butzkueven; Helen E O'Connell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Contemporary Opportunity for Prehabilitation as Part of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; David C Chang; Keith D Lillemoe; Ryan D Nipp; Kenneth K Tanabe; Motaz Qadan
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-02-28

7.  Symptom-based interventions to promote quality survivorship.

Authors:  Christina Amidei
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Comparison of Duke Activity Status Index with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael H-G Li; Vladimir Bolshinsky; Hilmy Ismail; Kwok-Ming Ho; Alexander Heriot; Bernhard Riedel
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Improving Adherence to Cancer Treatment by Addressing Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Cancers.

Authors:  Andrea L Cheville; Steven R Alberts; Teresa A Rummans; Jeffrey R Basford; Maria I Lapid; Jeff A Sloan; Daniel V Satele; Matthew M Clark
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.612

10.  Neighborhood-Level Social Disadvantage and Risk of Delirium Following Major Surgery.

Authors:  Franchesca Arias; Fan Chen; Tamara G Fong; Haley Shiff; Margarita Alegria; Edward R Marcantonio; Yun Gou; Richard N Jones; Thomas G Travison; Eva M Schmitt; Amy J H Kind; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.