Literature DB >> 24880047

Identifying Purkinje cells using only their spontaneous simple spike activity.

Robert A Hensbroek1, Tim Belton1, Boeke J van Beugen1, Jun Maruta1, Tom J H Ruigrok2, John I Simpson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have extended our cerebellar cortical interneuron classification algorithm that uses statistics of spontaneous activity (Ruigrok et al., 2011) to include Purkinje cells. Purkinje cells were added because they do not always show a detectable complex spike, which is the accepted identification. The statistical measures used in the present study were obtained from morphologically identified interneurons and complex spike identified Purkinje cells, recorded from ketamine-xylazine anesthetized rats and rabbits, and from awake rabbits. NEW
METHOD: The new algorithm has an added decision step that classifies Purkinje cells using a combination of the median absolute difference from the median interspike interval (MAD) and the mean of the relative differences of successive interspike intervals (CV2). These measures reflect the high firing rate and intermediate regularity of Purkinje cell simple spike activity.
RESULTS: Of 86 juxtacellularly labeled interneurons and 110 complex spike-identified Purkinje cells, 61 interneurons and 95 Purkinje cells were correctly classified, 22 interneurons and 13 Purkinje cells were deemed unclassifiable, and 3 interneurons and 2 Purkinje cells were incorrectly classified. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
METHODS: The new algorithm improves on our previous algorithm because it includes Purkinje cells. This algorithm is the only one for the cerebellum that does not presume anatomical knowledge of whether the cells are in the molecular layer or the granular layer.
CONCLUSIONS: These results strengthen the view that the new decision algorithm is useful for identifying neurons recorded at all cerebellar depths, particularly those neurons recorded in the rabbit vestibulocerebellum.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basket cell; Flocculus; Golgi cell; Granule cell; Stellate cell; Unipolar brush cell

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24880047     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  6 in total

1.  Translation information processing is regulated by protein kinase C-dependent mechanism in Purkinje cells in murine posterior vermis.

Authors:  Rosendo G Hernández; Chris I De Zeeuw; Ruyan Zhang; Tatyana A Yakusheva; Pablo M Blazquez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Encoding of eye movements explains reward-related activity in cerebellar simple spikes.

Authors:  Adi Lixenberg; Merav Yarkoni; Yehudit Botschko; Mati Joshua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Long Pauses in Cerebellar Interneurons in Anesthetized Animals.

Authors:  Ronit Givon-Mayo; Shlomi Haar; Yoav Aminov; Esther Simons; Opher Donchin
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Encoding of locomotion kinematics in the mouse cerebellum.

Authors:  Tomaso Muzzu; Susanna Mitolo; Giuseppe P Gava; Simon R Schultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Visuo-vestibular information processing by unipolar brush cells in the rabbit flocculus.

Authors:  Robert A Hensbroek; Tom J H Ruigrok; Boeke J van Beugen; Jun Maruta; John I Simpson
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  The dynamic relationship between cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spikes and the spikelet number of complex spikes.

Authors:  Amelia Burroughs; Andrew K Wise; Jianqiang Xiao; Conor Houghton; Tianyu Tang; Colleen Y Suh; Eric J Lang; Richard Apps; Nadia L Cerminara
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.