Literature DB >> 31940216

Encoding of eye movements explains reward-related activity in cerebellar simple spikes.

Adi Lixenberg1, Merav Yarkoni1, Yehudit Botschko1, Mati Joshua1.   

Abstract

The cerebellum exhibits both motor and reward-related signals. However, it remains unclear whether reward is processed independently from the motor command or might reflect the motor consequences of the reward drive. To test how reward-related signals interact with sensorimotor processing in the cerebellum, we recorded Purkinje cell simple spike activity in the cerebellar floccular complex while monkeys were engaged in smooth pursuit eye movement tasks. The color of the target signaled the size of the reward the monkeys would receive at the end of the target motion. When the tracking task presented a single target, both pursuit and neural activity were only slightly modulated by the reward size. The reward modulations in single cells were rarely large enough to be detected. These modulations were only significant in the population analysis when we averaged across many neurons. In two-target tasks where the monkey learned to select based on the size of the reward outcome, both behavior and neural activity adapted rapidly. In both the single- and two-target tasks, the size of the reward-related modulation matched the size of the effect of reward on behavior. Thus, unlike cortical activity in eye movement structures, the reward-related signals could not be dissociated from the motor command. These results suggest that reward information is integrated with the eye movement command upstream of the Purkinje cells in the floccular complex. Thus reward-related modulations of the simple spikes are akin to modulations found in motor behavior and not to the central processing of the reward value.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Disentangling sensorimotor and reward signals is only possible if these signals do not completely overlap. We recorded activity in the floccular complex of the cerebellum while monkeys performed tasks designed to separate representations of reward from those of movement. Activity modulation by reward could be accounted for by the coding of eye movement parameters, suggesting that reward information is already integrated into motor commands upstream of the floccular complex.

Keywords:  Purkinje cell; cerebellum; eye movements; kinematics; reward; smooth pursuit

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31940216      PMCID: PMC7052631          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00363.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  72 in total

1.  The oculomotor role of the pontine nuclei and the nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis.

Authors:  Peter Thier; Martin Möck
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.453

2.  Selective enhancement of associative learning by microstimulation of the anterior caudate.

Authors:  Ziv M Williams; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-26       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Encoding of probabilistic rewarding and aversive events by pallidal and nigral neurons.

Authors:  Mati Joshua; Avital Adler; Boris Rosin; Eilon Vaadia; Hagai Bergman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Encoding of Reward and Decoding Movement from the Frontal Eye Field during Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements.

Authors:  Adi Lixenberg; Mati Joshua
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual responses of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus during smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkeys. II. Complex spikes.

Authors:  L S Stone; S G Lisberger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Climbing fibre induced depression of both mossy fibre responsiveness and glutamate sensitivity of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  M Ito; M Sakurai; P Tongroach
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Timing Rules for Synaptic Plasticity Matched to Behavioral Function.

Authors:  Aparna Suvrathan; Hannah L Payne; Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Electrophysiological properties of in vitro Purkinje cell somata in mammalian cerebellar slices.

Authors:  R Llinás; M Sugimori
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Afferents to the flocculus of the cerebellum in the rhesus macaque as revealed by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase.

Authors:  T Langer; A F Fuchs; C A Scudder; M C Chubb
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1985-05-01       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 10.  Visuomotor cerebellum in human and nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Jan Voogd; Caroline K L Schraa-Tam; Jos N van der Geest; Chris I De Zeeuw
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

View more
  4 in total

1.  Research on the cerebellum yields rewards.

Authors:  Jennifer L Raymond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Altered Homotopic Connectivity in the Cerebellum Predicts Stereopsis Dysfunction in Patients With Comitant Exotropia.

Authors:  Fei Chen; Zhirou Hu; Hui Liu; Fangyuan Zhen; Chenlu Liu; Qiuming Li
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Alteration of Degree Centrality in Adolescents With Early Blindness.

Authors:  Zhi Wen; Yan Kang; Yu Zhang; Huaguang Yang; Baojun Xie
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.473

4.  Passive Motor Learning: Oculomotor Adaptation in the Absence of Behavioral Errors.

Authors:  Matan Cain; Yehudit Botschko; Mati Joshua
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-03-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.