Literature DB >> 24877795

Dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices: report of AAPM Task Group 176.

Arthur J Olch1, Lee Gerig2, Heng Li3, Ivaylo Mihaylov4, Andrew Morgan5.   

Abstract

The dosimetric impact from devices external to the patient is a complex combination of increased skin dose, reduced tumor dose, and altered dose distribution. Although small monitor unit or dose corrections are routinely made for blocking trays, ion chamber correction factors, e.g., accounting for temperature and pressure, or tissue inhomogeneities, the dose perturbation of the treatment couch top or immobilization devices is often overlooked. These devices also increase skin dose, an effect which is also often ignored or underestimated. These concerns have grown recently due to the increased use of monolithic carbon fiber couch tops which are optimal for imaging for patient position verification but cause attenuation and increased skin dose compared to the "tennis racket" style couch top they often replace. Also, arc delivery techniques have replaced stationary gantry techniques which cause a greater fraction of the dose to be delivered from posterior angles. A host of immobilization devices are available and used to increase patient positioning reproducibility, and these also have attenuation and skin dose implications which are often ignored. This report of Task Group 176 serves to present a survey of published data that illustrates the magnitude of the dosimetric effects of a wide range of devices external to the patient. The report also provides methods for modeling couch tops in treatment planning systems so the physicist can accurately compute the dosimetric effects for indexed patient treatments. Both photon and proton beams are considered. A discussion on avoidance of high density structures during beam planning is also provided. An important aspect of this report are the recommendations the authors make to clinical physicists, treatment planning system vendors, and device vendors on how to make measurements of surface dose and attenuation and how to report these values. For the vendors, an appeal is made to work together to provide accurate couch top models in planning systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24877795     DOI: 10.1118/1.4876299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  Safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during treatment planning for breast cancer treated with arc therapy.

Authors:  Marguerite Tyran; Agnes Tallet; Michel Resbeut; Marjorie Ferre; Veronique Favrel; Pierre Fau; Laurence Moureau-Zabotto; Julien Darreon; Laurence Gonzague; Ahcene Benkemouche; Leonel Varela-Cagetti; Naji Salem; Bertrand Farnault; Marie-Aimee Acquaviva; Hugues Mailleux
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Effects of Siemens TT-D carbon fiber table top on beam attenuation, and build up region of 6 MV photon beam.

Authors:  Asma Sheykhoo; Sara Abdollahi; Mohammad Hadi Hadizadeh Yazdi; Mahdi Ghorbani; Mohammad Mohammadi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-10-17

3.  Effectiveness of robust optimization in volumetric modulated arc therapy using 6 and 10 MV flattening filter-free beam therapy planning for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique.

Authors:  Hideharu Miura; Shuichi Ozawa; Yoshiko Doi; Minoru Nakao; Katsumaro Kubo; Masahiko Kenjo; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  The role of complexity metrics in a multi-institutional dosimetry audit of VMAT.

Authors:  Conor K McGarry; Christina E Agnew; Mohammad Hussein; Yatman Tsang; Alan McWilliam; Alan R Hounsell; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Verification of the dose attenuation of a newly developed vacuum cushion for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Toru Takakura; Yoshiyuki Ito; Akinori Higashikawa; Tomohiro Nishiyama; Takashi Sakamoto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-06-03

6.  Patient-related quality assurance with different combinations of treatment planning systems, techniques, and machines : A multi-institutional survey.

Authors:  Beatrice Steiniger; René Berger; Sabine Eilzer; Christine Kornhuber; Kathleen Lorenz; Torsten Peil; Carsten Reiffenstuhl; Johannes Schilz; Dirk Schröder; Michael Schwedas; Stephanie Pensold; Mathias Walke; Kirsten Weibert; Ulrich Wolf; Tilo Wiezorek
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  A Robust and Affordable Table Indexing Approach for Multi-isocenter Dosimetrically Matched Fields.

Authors:  Amy Yu; Benjamin Fahimian; Lynn Million; Annie Hsu
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-23

8.  Reduction of Potential Risk for Skin Toxicity in Megavoltage Radiotherapy Using a Novel Rigid Couch.

Authors:  Mikoto Tamura; Hajime Monzen; Kenji Matsumoto; Masahiko Okumura; Hiroshi Doi; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

9.  Absorption ratio of treatment couch and effect on surface and build-up region doses.

Authors:  Taylan Tuğrul
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-11-20

10.  Radiation dosimetry effect evaluation of a carbon fiber couch on novel uRT-linac 506c accelerator.

Authors:  Dazhen Jiang; Zhen Cao; Yongchang Wei; Tingting Cao; Jiuling Shen; Conghua Xie; Yunfeng Zhou; Hui Liu; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.