| Literature DB >> 24876632 |
Linda Highfield1, L Kay Bartholomew2, Marieke A Hartman2, M Molly Ford3, Philomene Balihe3.
Abstract
When community health planners select an evidence-based intervention that has been developed and tested in one situation and adapt it for use in a different situation or community, best practice suggests needs assessment and formative research in the new setting. Cancer prevention planners who are interested in adopting and adapting evidence-based approaches need to base their choices on a sound understanding of the health or behavioral risk problem in which they mean to intervene. This requires a balancing act of weighing community information against a broader perspective from the scientific literature and using the combination to identify and adapt an evidence-based intervention program that is likely to be effective in the new setting. This report is a case study of a community and organizational assessment conducted as a foundation for selecting and recommending adaptation of an evidence-based intervention for improving mammography appointment attendance. We used an inductive sequential exploratory mixed-methods design to inform this process. The process provides a model for formative research grounding evidence-based practice for cancer control planners. Future studies that incorporate findings from needs assessment into the adaptation of the selected intervention program may promote the effective dissemination of evidence-based programs.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; cancer prevention and control; community-based participatory research; formative evaluation; health disparities; health promotion; health research; program planning and evaluation
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24876632 PMCID: PMC4216624 DOI: 10.1177/1524839914534685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Promot Pract ISSN: 1524-8399