Literature DB >> 24876612

Treatment recommendations following 3-day masked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in youth with type 1 diabetes.

Lisa E Rasbach1, Ashley E Atkins2, Kerry M Milaszewski2, Joyce Keady2, Lisa M Schmidt2, Lisa K Volkening2, Lori M Laffel3.   

Abstract

Glycemic control remains suboptimal in youth with type 1 diabetes. Retrospective continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has demonstrated utility in fine-tuning diabetes management by detecting postprandial hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. In this study, we explored the process of 3-day masked CGM use, subsequent treatment recommendations, and impact on A1c in a clinic-based sample of youth with type 1 diabetes. Over 2 years, 122 youth were referred for masked CGM. Patients/families completed a diary of blood glucose levels, insulin doses, food intake, and exercise during CGM use. A1c was assessed pre- and 2-3 months post-CGM. Treatment recommendations were formulated using data from CGM reports and diaries. Mean age was 14.3 ± 3.9 years, diabetes duration was 7.5 ± 4.7 years, and A1c was 8.5 ± 1.1% (69 ± 12 mmol/mol); 61% were pump-treated. Patients received an average of 3.1 ± 1.1 treatment recommendations following review of the CGM report. Most (80%) received reinforcement of the importance of preprandial bolusing; 37% received a recommendation regarding advanced insulin management (use of combination boluses/attend to active insulin). Receipt of the latter recommendation was related to A1c improvement ≥0.5% (OR: 4.0, P < .001). Masked CGM offers opportunities to guide advanced insulin management (by injection or pump), which may yield A1c improvements in youth with type 1 diabetes.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A1c; continuous glucose monitoring; pediatrics; type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876612      PMCID: PMC4455435          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814528135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  12 in total

1.  Improved glycemic control in poorly controlled patients with type 1 diabetes using real-time continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Dorothee Deiss; Jan Bolinder; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Tadej Battelino; Emanuele Bosi; Nadia Tubiana-Rufi; David Kerr; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Effect of puberty on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin pump therapy in youth with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Karena L Swan; Stuart A Weinzimer; James D Dziura; Garry M Steil; Gayane R Voskanyan; Amy T Steffen; Melody L Martin; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Continuous glucose monitoring in youth with type 1 diabetes: 12-month follow-up of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial.

Authors:  H Peter Chase; Roy W Beck; Dongyuan Xing; William V Tamborlane; Julie Coffey; Larry A Fox; Brett Ives; Joyce Keady; Craig Kollman; Lori Laffel; Katrina J Ruedy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  E Boland; T Monsod; M Delucia; C A Brandt; S Fernando; W V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Effect of short-term iPRO continuous glucose monitoring on hemoglobin A1c levels in clinical practice.

Authors:  Gary M Pepper; Jamie Steinsapir; Kathryn Reynolds
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  The Continuous Glucose Monitoring System (CGMS) in type 1 diabetic children is the way to reduce hypoglycemic risk.

Authors:  R Schiaffini; P Ciampalini; A Fierabracci; S Spera; P Borrelli; G F Bottazzo; A Crinò
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.876

7.  Clinical outcomes associated with referral-based continuous glucose monitoring using a central standardized interpretation strategy.

Authors:  Anthony Miele; Karen Weiland; Kathleen M Dungan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Continuing stability of center differences in pediatric diabetes care: do advances in diabetes treatment improve outcome? The Hvidoere Study Group on Childhood Diabetes.

Authors:  Carine E de Beaufort; Peter G F Swift; Chas T Skinner; Henk J Aanstoot; Jan Aman; Fergus Cameron; Pedro Martul; Francesco Chiarelli; Dennis Daneman; Thomas Danne; Harry Dorchy; Hilary Hoey; Eero A Kaprio; Francine Kaufman; Mirjana Kocova; Henrik B Mortensen; Pal R Njølstad; Moshe Phillip; Kenneth J Robertson; Eugen J Schoenle; Tatsuhiko Urakami; Maurizio Vanelli
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Outpatient assessment of determinants of glucose excursions in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: proof of concept.

Authors:  David M Maahs; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Franziska K Bishop; Lily Wang; Meg Mangan; Robert G McMurray
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.118

10.  Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Jamie R Wood; Kellee M Miller; David M Maahs; Roy W Beck; Linda A DiMeglio; Ingrid M Libman; Maryanne Quinn; William V Tamborlane; Stephanie E Woerner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

1.  Text messaging intervention for teens and young adults with diabetes.

Authors:  Jessica T Markowitz; Tara Cousineau; Debra L Franko; Alan T Schultz; Meredith Trant; Rachel Rodgers; Lori M B Laffel
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-22

2.  Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Alana McMichael; Maria Rivera-Santana; Jacob Noel; Tamara Hershey
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-03

3.  Clinical efficacy of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring in improving glycemic control among children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: An Open-label Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  K V Raviteja; Rakesh Kumar; Devi Dayal; Naresh Sachdeva
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.