Literature DB >> 24876538

Accuracy of a Novel Noninvasive Multisensor Technology to Estimate Glucose in Diabetic Subjects During Dynamic Conditions.

Sandra I Sobel1, Peter J Chomentowski1, Nisarg Vyas2, David Andre2, Frederico G S Toledo3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an approach of multisensor technology with integrated data analysis in an armband system (SenseWear® Pro Armband, SWA) can provide estimates of plasma glucose concentration in diabetes. In all, 41 subjects with diabetes participated. On day 1 subjects underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and on day 2 a 60-minute treadmill test (TT). SWA plasma glucose estimates were compared against reference peripheral venous glucose concentrations. A continuous glucose monitoring device (CGM) was also placed on each subject to serve as a reference for clinical comparison. Pearson coefficient, Clarke error grid (CEG), and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) analyses were used to compare the performance of plasma glucose estimation. There were significant correlations between plasma glucose concentrations estimated by the SWA and the reference plasma glucose concentration during the OGTT (r = .65, P < .05) and the TT (r = .91, P < .05). CEG analysis revealed that during the OGTT, 93% of plasma glucose concentration readings were in the clinically acceptable zone A+B for the SWA and 95% for the CGM. During the TT, the SWA had 96% of readings in zone A+B, compared to 97% for the CGM. During OGTTs, MARDs for the SWA and CGM were 26% and 18%, respectively. During TTs, MARDs were 16% and 12%, respectively. Plasma glucose concentration estimation by the SWA's noninvasive multisensor approach appears to be feasible and its performance in estimating glucose approaches that of a CGM. The success of this pilot study suggests that multisensor technology holds promising potential for the development of a wearable, noninvasive, painless glucose monitor.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; continuous glucose monitor; noninvasive glucose monitoring; self-monitoring of blood glucose

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876538      PMCID: PMC4454109          DOI: 10.1177/1932296813516182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  28 in total

1.  Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring with optical coherence tomography: a pilot study in human subjects.

Authors:  Kirill V Larin; Mohsen S Eledrisi; Massoud Motamedi; Rinat O Esenaliev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Thomas Zueger; Peter Diem; Stavroula Mougiakakou; Christoph Stettler
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  The need for clinical accuracy guidelines for blood glucose monitors.

Authors:  David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

Review 4.  Cutaneous blood perfusion as a perturbing factor for noninvasive glucose monitoring.

Authors:  Andreas Caduff; Mark S Talary; Pavel Zakharov
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Evaluating the clinical accuracy of two continuous glucose sensors using continuous glucose-error grid analysis.

Authors:  William L Clarke; Stacey Anderson; Leon Farhy; Marc Breton; Linda Gonder-Frederick; Daniel Cox; Boris Kovatchev
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  W L Clarke; D Cox; L A Gonder-Frederick; W Carter; S L Pohl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Non-invasive estimate of blood glucose and blood pressure from a photoplethysmograph by means of machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Enric Monte-Moreno
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Disruption in the diabetic device care market.

Authors:  Utkarsh Ojha; Raihan Mohammed
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2018-02-02

2.  Precision Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: A Pilot Study on Deep Learning for Hypoglycemic Events Detection based on ECG.

Authors:  Mihaela Porumb; Saverio Stranges; Antonio Pescapè; Leandro Pecchia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Sensor Monitoring of Physical Activity to Improve Glucose Management in Diabetic Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Sandrine Ding; Michael Schumacher
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 4.  Sensor Fusion and Smart Sensor in Sports and Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  José Jair Alves Mendes; Mário Elias Marinho Vieira; Marcelo Bissi Pires; Sergio Luiz Stevan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  Wearable Health Devices-Vital Sign Monitoring, Systems and Technologies.

Authors:  Duarte Dias; João Paulo Silva Cunha
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 6.  Hypoglycaemia detection and prediction techniques: A systematic review on the latest developments.

Authors:  Omar Diouri; Monika Cigler; Martina Vettoretti; Julia K Mader; Pratik Choudhary; Eric Renard
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.