Literature DB >> 24876427

Accuracy evaluation of blood glucose monitoring systems in children on overnight closed-loop control.

Daniel J DeSalvo1, Satya Shanmugham1, Trang T Ly1, Darrell M Wilson1, Bruce A Buckingham2.   

Abstract

This pilot study evaluated the difference in accuracy between the Bayer Contour® Next (CN) and HemoCue® (HC) glucose monitoring systems in children with type 1 diabetes participating in overnight closed-loop studies. Subjects aged 10-18 years old were admitted to a clinical research center and glucose values were obtained every 30 minutes overnight. Glucose values were measured using whole blood samples for CN and HC readings and results were compared to Yellow Springs Instrument (YSI) reference values obtained with plasma from the same sample. System accuracy was compared using mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) accuracy standards. A total of 28 subjects were enrolled in the study. Glucose measurements were evaluated at 457 time points. CN performed better than HC with an average MARD of 3.13% compared to 10.73% for HC (P < .001). With a limited sample size, CN met ISO criteria (2003 and 2013) at all glucose ranges while HC did not. CN performed very well, and would make an excellent meter for future closed-loop studies outside of a research center.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contour Next; HemoCue; YSI; accuracy; blood glucose; blood glucose meter; closed-loop

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876427      PMCID: PMC4455362          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814532238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy.

Authors:  Kai J Buhling; Wolfgang Henrich; Siri L Kjos; Gerda Siebert; Elizabeth Starr; Christine Dreweck; Ursula Stein; Joachim W Dudenhausen
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.281

2.  Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Annette Baumstark; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial.

Authors:  Solveig Halldorsdottir; Mary Ellen Warchal-Windham; Jane F Wallace; Scott Pardo; Joan Lee Parkes; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-01

4.  A closed-loop artificial pancreas based on risk management.

Authors:  Fraser Cameron; B Wayne Bequette; Darrell M Wilson; Bruce A Buckingham; Hyunjin Lee; Günter Niemeyer
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Impact of prandial status on the comparison of capillary glucose meter and venous plasma glucose measurements in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Akhilesh Swaminathan; Helen Lunt; Winston S J Chang; Florence J Logan; Christopher M A Frampton; Christopher M Florkowski
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.057

7.  Inpatient studies of a Kalman-filter-based predictive pump shutoff algorithm.

Authors:  Fraser Cameron; Darrell M Wilson; Bruce A Buckingham; Hasmik Arzumanyan; Paula Clinton; H Peter Chase; John Lum; David M Maahs; Peter M Calhoun; B Wayne Bequette
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-09-01

8.  Blood glucose measurements in arterial blood of intensive care unit patients submitted to tight glycemic control: agreement between bedside tests.

Authors:  Dirk Vlasselaers; Tom Van Herpe; Ilse Milants; Mona Eerdekens; Pieter J Wouters; Bart De Moor; Greet Van den Berghe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

Review 9.  Continuous glucose monitoring: current use and future directions.

Authors:  Daniel DeSalvo; Bruce Buckingham
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.810

10.  Blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes with a bihormonal bionic endocrine pancreas.

Authors:  Steven J Russell; Firas H El-Khatib; David M Nathan; Kendra L Magyar; John Jiang; Edward R Damiano
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Malte Rutschmann; Cornelia Haug; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14

2.  System Accuracy Evaluation of Four Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Following ISO 15197 Using a Glucose Oxidase and a Hexokinase-Based Comparison Method.

Authors:  Manuela Link; Christina Schmid; Stefan Pleus; Annette Baumstark; Delia Rittmeyer; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-04-14

3.  Comparative Accuracy of 17 Point-of-Care Glucose Meters.

Authors:  Laya Ekhlaspour; Debbie Mondesir; Norman Lautsch; Courtney Balliro; Mallory Hillard; Kendra Magyar; Laura Goergen Radocchia; Aryan Esmaeili; Manasi Sinha; Steven J Russell
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-10-03

4.  The Rectangle Target Plot: A New Approach to the Graphical Presentation of Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Peter Stephan; Christina Schmid; Guido Freckmann; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug; Peter Müller
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-10-09

5.  Effect of lipohypertrophy on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Daniel J DeSalvo; David M Maahs; Laurel Messer; R Paul Wadwa; Shelby Payne; Trang T Ly; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Continuous Glucose Sensor Survival and Accuracy Over 14 Consecutive Days.

Authors:  Daniel J DeSalvo; Trang T Ly; R Paul Wadwa; Laurel Messer; Emily Westfall; Divya Gopisetty; Sarah Hanes; Rie von Eyben; David M Maahs; Bruce A Buckingham
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 19.112

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.