Literature DB >> 24876422

Development of the Likelihood of Low Glucose (LLG) algorithm for evaluating risk of hypoglycemia: a new approach for using continuous glucose data to guide therapeutic decision making.

Timothy C Dunn1, Gary A Hayter2, Ken J Doniger2, Howard A Wolpert3.   

Abstract

The objective was to develop an analysis methodology for generating diabetes therapy decision guidance using continuous glucose (CG) data. The novel Likelihood of Low Glucose (LLG) methodology, which exploits the relationship between glucose median, glucose variability, and hypoglycemia risk, is mathematically based and can be implemented in computer software. Using JDRF Continuous Glucose Monitoring Clinical Trial data, CG values for all participants were divided into 4-week periods starting at the first available sensor reading. The safety and sensitivity performance regarding hypoglycemia guidance "stoplights" were compared between the LLG method and one based on 10th percentile (P10) values. Examining 13 932 hypoglycemia guidance outputs, the safety performance of the LLG method ranged from 0.5% to 5.4% incorrect "green" indicators, compared with 0.9% to 6.0% for P10 value of 110 mg/dL. Guidance with lower P10 values yielded higher rates of incorrect indicators, such as 11.7% to 38% at 80 mg/dL. When evaluated only for periods of higher glucose (median above 155 mg/dL), the safety performance of the LLG method was superior to the P10 method. Sensitivity performance of correct "red" indicators of the LLG method had an in sample rate of 88.3% and an out of sample rate of 59.6%, comparable with the P10 method up to about 80 mg/dL. To aid in therapeutic decision making, we developed an algorithm-supported report that graphically highlights low glucose risk and increased variability. When tested with clinical data, the proposed method demonstrated equivalent or superior safety and sensitivity performance.
© 2014 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ambulatory glucose profile; continuous glucose monitoring; diabetes therapy decision support; hypoglycemia risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876422      PMCID: PMC4764240          DOI: 10.1177/1932296814532200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  36 in total

1.  The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Eric S Kilpatrick; Alan S Rigby; Stephen L Atkin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Fear of hypoglycaemia in mothers and fathers of children with Type 1 diabetes is associated with poor glycaemic control and parental emotional distress: a population-based study.

Authors:  A Haugstvedt; T Wentzel-Larsen; M Graue; O Søvik; B Rokne
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.359

3.  JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension.

Authors:  Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Eyal Dassau; Erin Cobry; Paula Clinton; Victoria Gage; Kimberly Caswell; John Wilkinson; Fraser Cameron; Hyunjin Lee; B Wayne Bequette; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Characterizing glucose exposure for individuals with normal glucose tolerance using continuous glucose monitoring and ambulatory glucose profile analysis.

Authors:  Roger S Mazze; Ellie Strock; David Wesley; Sarah Borgman; Blaine Morgan; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Patient-reported outcomes in a survey of patients treated with oral antihyperglycaemic medications: associations with hypoglycaemia and weight gain.

Authors:  E Marrett; T Stargardt; P Mavros; C M Alexander
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.577

7.  A randomized study in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac surgery comparing computer-guided glucose management with a standard sliding scale protocol.

Authors:  Leif Saager; Gordon L Collins; Beth Burnside; Heidi Tymkew; Lini Zhang; Eric Jacobsohn; Michael Avidan
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Continuous glucose monitoring counseling improves physical activity behaviors of individuals with type 2 diabetes: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nancy A Allen; James A Fain; Barry Braun; Stuart R Chipkin
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  William V Tamborlane; Roy W Beck; Bruce W Bode; Bruce Buckingham; H Peter Chase; Robert Clemons; Rosanna Fiallo-Scharer; Larry A Fox; Lisa K Gilliam; Irl B Hirsch; Elbert S Huang; Craig Kollman; Aaron J Kowalski; Lori Laffel; Jean M Lawrence; Joyce Lee; Nelly Mauras; Michael O'Grady; Katrina J Ruedy; Michael Tansey; Eva Tsalikian; Stuart Weinzimer; Darrell M Wilson; Howard Wolpert; Tim Wysocki; Dongyuan Xing
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time.

Authors:  D M Nathan; H Turgeon; S Regan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 10.122

View more
  5 in total

1.  Evaluating a Glucose-Sensor-Based Tool to Help Clinicians and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Improve Self-Management Skills.

Authors:  Elena Toschi; Lawrence Fisher; Howard Wolpert; Michael Love; Timothy Dunn; Gary Hayter
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Recent Studies Demonstrating Improved Glycemic Outcomes.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Individuals with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Trade Increased Hyperglycemia for Decreased Hypoglycemia When Glycemic Variability is not Improved.

Authors:  Sujit R Jangam; Gary Hayter; Timothy C Dunn
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.945

4.  Role of free style Libre-Flash Glucose Monitoring: Glycemic control of Type-1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Imad A A Mohamed; Iman M Talaat; Hamed A Alghamdi; Gamal Allam
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  A Pilot Study to Assess Clinical Utility and User Experience of Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Among People With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Kurt Midyett; Jeffrey R Unger; Eugene E Wright; Timothy D Daniel; Davida F Kruger; Robert R Henry; Refaat A Hegazi
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2019-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.