Literature DB >> 24875453

Beyond screening for risk factors: objective detection of strabismus and amblyopia.

Reed M Jost1, Susan E Yanni1, Cynthia L Beauchamp2, David R Stager2, David Stager3, Lori Dao3, Eileen E Birch4.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Commercially available automated vision screening devices assess refractive risk factors, not amblyopia or strabismus, underreferring affected children and overreferring healthy children. Nearly half of affected children are not identified until after age 5 years, when treatment is less effective.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Pediatric Vision Scanner (PVS), a binocular retinal birefringence scanner, to objectively identify strabismus and amblyopia, and to compare retinal birefringence screening with a widely used automated pediatric screening device. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred consecutive preschool children (aged 2-6 years) were screened using the PVS and the SureSight Autorefractor at 2 pediatric ophthalmology private practices. A masked comprehensive pediatric ophthalmic examination provided the gold standard for determining sensitivity and specificity for each screening device. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was sensitivity and specificity of the PVS for detecting the targeted conditions, strabismus and amblyopia, in children aged 2 to 6 years. Secondary outcomes included the positive and negative likelihood ratios of the PVS for identifying the targeted conditions. In addition, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the SureSight Autorefractor for the targeted conditions were assessed in the same cohort of children.
RESULTS: Of the 300 patients, 188 had strabismus only, amblyopia only, or both, and 112 had no strabismus or amblyopia. The sensitivity of the PVS to detect strabismus and amblyopia (0.97; 95% CI, 0.94-1.00) was significantly higher than that of the SureSight Autorefractor (0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83). Specificity of the PVS for strabismus and amblyopia (0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95) was significantly higher than that of the SureSight Autorefractor (0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.73). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The PVS identified children with strabismus and/or amblyopia with high sensitivity, outperforming the SureSight Autorefractor. Accurate, early detection of these conditions could improve long-term vision outcomes of affected preschool children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875453      PMCID: PMC4334567          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  49 in total

1.  A systematic review of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia.

Authors:  A R Kemper; P A Margolis; S M Downs; W C Bordley
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Compliance with vision-screening guidelines among a national sample of pediatricians.

Authors:  Terry C Wall; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; H Hughes Evans; Crayton A Fargason; Carolyn S Ashworth; J Michael Hardin
Journal:  Ambul Pediatr       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec

3.  Functional visual loss in amblyopia and the effect of occlusion therapy.

Authors:  A J Simmers; L S Gray; P V McGraw; B Winn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  10-Diopter fixation test for amblyopia.

Authors:  K W Wright; F Walonker; P Edelman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-07

5.  Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in white and African American children aged 6 through 71 months the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study.

Authors:  David S Friedman; Michael X Repka; Joanne Katz; Lydia Giordano; Josephine Ibironke; Patricia Hawse; James M Tielsch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Comparison of preschool vision screening tests as administered by licensed eye care professionals in the Vision In Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Paulette Schmidt; Maureen Maguire; Velma Dobson; Graham Quinn; Elise Ciner; Lynn Cyert; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Bruce Moore; Deborah Orel-Bixler; Maryann Redford; Gui-shuang Ying
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus.

Authors:  Emin Cumhur Sener; Mehmet Cem Mocan; Sansal Gedik; Ahmet Ergin; Ali Sefik Sanaç
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Childhood amblyopia treatment: psychosocial implications for patients and primary carers.

Authors:  Y F Choong; H Lukman; S Martin; D E Laws
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia.

Authors:  K W Wright; P M Edelman; F Walonker; S Yiu
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-04

10.  Bilateral oculomotor abnormalities in strabismic amblyopes: evidence for a common central mechanism.

Authors:  H E Bedell; M C Flom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

View more
  16 in total

1.  High specificity of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a private pediatric primary care setting.

Authors:  Reed M Jost; David Stager; Lori Dao; Scott Katz; Russ McDonald; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Screening, confirming, and treating amblyopia based on binocularity.

Authors:  Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.389

3.  Variability of Ocular Deviation in Strabismus.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Vision screening at two years does not reduce the prevalence of reduced vision at four and a half years of age.

Authors:  Lucy Goodman; Arijit Chakraborty; Nabin Paudel; Tzu-Ying Yu; Robert J Jacobs; Jane E Harding; Benjamin Thompson; Nicola S Anstice
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  Validation of the Pediatric Vision Scanner in a normal preschool population.

Authors:  Shaival S Shah; Jennifer J Jimenez; Emily J Rozema; Miki T Nguyen; Melissa Preciado; Ashish M Mehta
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 1.325

6.  Performance of the Plusoptix A09 photoscreener in detecting amblyopia risk factors in Chinese children attending an eye clinic.

Authors:  Xiao-Ran Yan; Wan-Zhen Jiao; Zhi-Wei Li; Wen-Wen Xu; Feng-Jiao Li; Li-Hua Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Current Understanding of What Infants See.

Authors:  Lea Hyvärinen; Renate Walthes; Namita Jacob; Kay Nottingham Chaplin; Mercè Leonhardt
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2014

8.  Evaluation of a smartphone photoscreening app to detect refractive amblyopia risk factors in children aged 1-6 years.

Authors:  Robert W Arnold; James W O'Neil; Kim L Cooper; David I Silbert; Sean P Donahue
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-23

9.  Canon CP-TX1 camera - As a screening tool for amblyogenic risk factors.

Authors:  Syed Aisha Raza; Abadan Khan Amitava; Yogesh Gupta; Kamran Afzal; Farnaz Kauser; Juhi Saxena; Anam Masood; Aparna Bose; Ramprakash Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  New pediatric vision screener, part II: electronics, software, signal processing and validation.

Authors:  Boris I Gramatikov; Kristina Irsch; Yi-Kai Wu; David L Guyton
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.