Literature DB >> 24875268

Enhancing animal welfare by creating opportunities for positive affective engagement.

D J Mellor1.   

Abstract

In line with an increasing emphasis on promoting positive welfare states in animals, this review extends previous accounts of how recent affective neuroscience observations may be used to identify and then to encourage animals to engage in reward-motivated behaviours. The terms affective states or affects are used to mean the subjective experiences, feelings or emotions that may motivate animals to behave in goal-directed ways and which may accompany success or failure to achieve those goals. These motivational affects may be positive, experienced as rewarding or pleasurable, or negative, experienced as aversive or punishing. There are two overall types: homeostasis-related negative affects that reflect an animal's internal physiological state, and situation-related positive or negative affects that reflect an animal's perception of its external circumstances. The major emphasis is on positive situation-related affects, in particular those that are potentially associated with exploration, feeding and animal-to-animal affiliative behaviours. The review introduces the new concept of positive affective engagement which represents the experience animals may have when they actively respond to motivations to engage in rewarding behaviours, and it incorporates all associated affects that are positive. For example, it would represent a state of engaged aliveness that may attend an animal's goal-directed, energised exploration of and interactions with a stimulus-rich environment. It also represents some states of equally energised, highly focused predatory stalking by carnivores or the focused and engaged foraging by herbivores when they are grazing in natural environments where food sources are abundant. Positive affective engagement may also be anticipated to accompany some aspects of reciprocated affiliative interactions between animals, the dedicated maternal nurturing and care of young, the joyfulness of rough-and-tumble play, and the eroticism and orgasmic pleasures of sexual activity. It is argued that highlighting the genetically pre-programmed, affectively positive impulses to engage in reward-motivated activities such as these, and the positive affects that may attend different facets of the process, draws attention to a wider spectrum of welfare enhancing experiences than has hitherto been considered to be important to animals. These neuroscience-supported observations strengthen many prior inferences made from predominantly behaviour-based investigations of animals' preferences, aversions and priorities, the associated development of successful environmental enrichments and the inclusion of these, where practicable, in more recent codes of practice or welfare.

Keywords:  Affective neuroscience; affiliative and environment focused activities; positive affective engagement; reward-motivated behaviours; welfare promotion

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24875268     DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2014.926799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Vet J        ISSN: 0048-0169            Impact factor:   1.628


  25 in total

1.  Updating Animal Welfare Thinking: Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" towards "A Life Worth Living".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 3.  Changes in the Welfare of an Injured Working Farm Dog Assessed Using the Five Domains Model.

Authors:  Katherine E Littlewood; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Forensic Use of the Five Domains Model for Assessing Suffering in Cases of Animal Cruelty.

Authors:  Rebecca A Ledger; David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Assessment of Welfare in Zoo Animals: Towards Optimum Quality of Life.

Authors:  Sarah Wolfensohn; Justine Shotton; Hannah Bowley; Siân Davies; Sarah Thompson; William S M Justice
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Stocking Density Affects Welfare Indicators in Horses Reared for Meat Production.

Authors:  Federica Raspa; Martina Tarantola; Domenico Bergero; Claudio Bellino; Chiara Maria Mastrazzo; Alice Visconti; Ermenegildo Valvassori; Ingrid Vervuert; Emanuela Valle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Positive Welfare and the Like: Distinct Views and a Proposed Framework.

Authors:  Jean-Loup Rault; Sara Hintze; Irene Camerlink; Jason Richard Yee
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-07-02

8.  Tail Docking of Canine Puppies: Reassessment of the Tail's Role in Communication, the Acute Pain Caused by Docking and Interpretation of Behavioural Responses.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Moving beyond the "Five Freedoms" by Updating the "Five Provisions" and Introducing Aligned "Animal Welfare Aims".

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Mouth Pain in Horses: Physiological Foundations, Behavioural Indices, Welfare Implications, and a Suggested Solution.

Authors:  David J Mellor
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.