To provide insight into the iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) of histidine ligated heme proteins, we have probed the active site of myoglobin compound II over the pH range of 3.9-9.5, using EXAFS, Mössbauer, and resonance Raman spectroscopies. We find no indication of ferryl protonation over this pH range, allowing us to set an upper limit of 2.7 on the iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) in myoglobin. Together with the recent determination of an iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) ∼ 12 in the thiolate-ligated heme enzyme cytochrome P450, this result provides insight into Nature's ability to tune catalytic function through its choice of axial ligand.
To provide insight into the iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) of histidine ligated heme proteins, we have probed the active site of myoglobin compound II over the pH range of 3.9-9.5, using EXAFS, Mössbauer, and resonance Raman spectroscopies. We find no indication of ferryl protonation over this pH range, allowing us to set an upper limit of 2.7 on the iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) in myoglobin. Together with the recent determination of an iron(IV)hydroxide pK(a) ∼ 12 in the thiolate-ligated heme enzyme cytochrome P450, this result provides insight into Nature's ability to tune catalytic function through its choice of axial ligand.
A fundamental understanding
of protein structure–function
relationships is key to harnessing the catalytic power of enzymes
for chemical applications. For some time now, we have been interested
in the factors that govern C–H bond activation in heme proteins.[1,2] Cytochrome P450s are a class of thiolate ligated heme proteins that
utilize dioxygen and the formal equivalents of molecular hydrogen
(2H+ + 2e-) to functionalize a broad range of biologically
active molecules.[3] These enzymes have been
shown to function through a high-valent ferryl (or iron(IV)oxo) radical
species called compound I.[4] Compound I
abstracts hydrogen from substrate to form an iron(IV)hydroxide species
(compound II) and a substrate radical, which rapidly recombine to
give hydroxylated product.[4]An enigmatic
aspect of P450 catalysis has been the enzyme’s
use of an electron-rich thiolate ligated heme to catalyze the oxidation
of inert hydrocarbons. We have shown that strong donation from the
axial thiolate results in basic ferryl species.[1] UV–vis and 57Fe Mössbauer experiments
place P450s compound II (or iron(IV)hydroxide) pKa at ∼12.[5] This elevated
pKa may provide an answer to the question
posed by Groves more than a decade ago: “How can a protein
create an iron intermediate reactive enough to hydroxylate even as
inert a substrate as cyclohexane and not oxidize the relatively fragile
protein superstructure?”[6]We have argued that the elevated pKa afforded
by thiolate ligation shifts the relative free energy for
the productive and nonproductive pathways to a regime where the rate
constant for productive C–H bond activation dominates that
for nonproductive oxidations of the protein superstructure.[5] One can obtain insight into the role of thiolate
ligation in cytochrome P450 by considering a system in which the compound
II pKa can be modulated/tuned, while keeping
the driving force for productive substrate oxidation constant. Given
this constraint, one can use Marcus theory to derive eq 1, which allows for a comparison of rate constants for nonproductive
oxidations by compound I, knp, as a function
of compound II pKas.[5]Eq 1 shows that the
rate constant for nonproductive oxidations varies dramatically with
changes in the iron(IV)hydroxide pKa.
We have argued that, all things being equal, thiolate ligation provides
(relative to histidine ligation) for a > 10,000-fold
reduction in the rate constant for nonproductive oxidations of the
protein framework, explaining Nature’s use of thiolate ligation
in P450.[5] Through suppression of the nonproductive
pathway—minimizing peroxidase like chemistry—thiolate
ligation biases P450 toward C–H bond activation.The
use of eq 1 outlined above requires knowledge
of the iron(IV)hydroxide pKa in a histidine
ligated heme protein. To obtain the factor of 10,000, we have made
use of resonance Raman data, reported by Terner and co-workers for
horseradish peroxidase compound II (HRP-II). They observed an iron-oxo
stretch in HRP-II at pD 4, suggesting an iron(IV)hydroxide pKa ≤ 3.6.[7−9]We note, however,
that the existence of iron(IV)hydroxide species
in peroxidases and globins has been a subject of debate. A number
of crystallographic investigations of compound II species have reported
long iron–oxygen bonds, which have been interpreted in terms
of a protonated ferryl (i.e., an iron(IV)hydroxide) moiety.[10−14] These crystallographic assignments have generally been at odds with
spectroscopic measurements that indicate the presence of authentic
iron(IV)oxo species.[7,15−22] This discrepancy has been explained in terms of photoreduction in
the synchrotron beam. It has been argued that the long iron–oxygen
bond distances obtained from crystallography may more accurately represent
ferric and ferrous forms of the proteins.[15,23] Recent crystallographic experiments, designed to minimize and study
the effects of photoreduction on these systems, have produced shorter
iron–oxygen bond distances that are more in line with the values
obtained from spectroscopy.[13,24]In spite of these
results, reports of iron(IV)hydroxide species
in histidine ligated heme proteins have continued to surface.[13] Eq 1 reveals the importance
of determining the pKa of these systems.
This thermodynamic parameter can provide critical insight into Nature’s
ability to tune the function of heme proteins through the choice of
axial ligation.[5] We have shown that the
best way to address this problem is through the use of multiple spectroscopies.[1,4,5,15,23,25−27] In hopes of providing insight into the existence of iron(IV)hydroxide
species in histidine ligated heme proteins, we present an exhaustive
spectroscopic characterization of myoglobin compound II (Mb-II). Mb-II
represents a particularly convenient system with which to examine
the problem. Mb-II has long served as a model for intermediates in
the catalytic cycles of heme peroxidase. It can be prepared in the
high purities (without contamination from other oxidation states)
and the high yields required for spectroscopic measurements. Importantly,
Mb-II can be obtained over a wide pH range using the pH jump method.
Myoglobin
Compound II and the Status of Ferryl Protonation
Mb-II has
been at the center of the debate concerning the existence
of iron(IV)hydroxide species in histidine ligated heme proteins. The
controversy stems from a series of conflicting X-ray crystallographic
and spectroscopic reports.[15,23] High-resolution crystal
structures of Mb-II, horseradish peroxidase compound II (HRP-II),
and cytochrome c peroxidase compound I (CCP-I), which
is best described as a ferryl porphyrin (i.e., compound II) intermediate
with a distant uncoupled protein-based radical, have indicated long
(1.84–1.92 Å) Fe–O bonds between the hemeiron
and distal oxygen ligand.[10−14] These distances are too long to be associated with a traditional
iron(IV)oxo species.[15,23] To make sense of these distances,
crystallographers have invoked ferryl protonation. They have assigned
these species as iron(IV)hydroxide complexes. This assignment, however,
is at odds with the data obtained from spectroscopic measurements
on these intermediates. Extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS)
and resonance Raman spectroscopies provide Fe–O bond distances
(∼1.65 Å)[1,16−18] and Fe–O
vibrational frequencies (∼790 cm–1)[7,15,19−22,28] that are consistent with the values obtained from synthetic ferryl
porphyrins.[22]In hopes of clarifying
the ferryl protonation status of histidine ligated heme proteins,
Green examined the applicability of Badger’s rule (an empirical
formula relating bond distance and vibrational frequency) to the available
experimental data.[23] Good correlation was
found between EXAFS determined bond distances and reported Fe–O
vibrational frequencies, while the crystallographically determined
bond distances deviated substantially from the values predicted by
Badger’s rule. Through comparisons with a plot of Fe–O
distance versus iron oxidation state, it was concluded that the long
Fe–O bonds obtained from crystallography were the hallmarks
of ferric and ferrous complexes. That is, they were a direct result
of radiation damage.[23]The research
groups of Poulos, Schlichting, and Andersson have
provided additional insight into the discrepancies between the Fe–O
bond distances obtained from X-ray crystallography and spectroscopy.[24,29,30] These groups systematically studied
the photoreduction that occurs during the collection of an X-ray crystallographic
data set. Specifically, they examined how prolonged exposure of metalloprotein
crystals to synchrotron radiation results in reduction of the redox-active
metal center. They studied the effects on structure and coordination
of the active site. Reduction of the metal center was monitored by
microspectrophotometry, and changes in the single crystal visible
absorption spectra were recorded as a function of radiation dosage.[24,29,30]Poulos and co-workers examined
photoreduction in crystals of CCP-I.[24] They
found that <30% of the ferryl intermediate
remained after a dose of 1 MGy, only ∼3% of the theoretical
dosage limit for protein crystals.[31,32] By piecing
together data sets collected for 19 crystals, Poulos and co-workers
obtained the Fe–O bond distance as a function of radiation
dosage. They found that the Fe–O distance varied linearly with
dosage, extrapolating to 1.72 ± 0.02 Å at zero exposure
and increasing by 0.25 Å/MGy up to 1.90 Å at the highest
doses.[24]Schlichting and co-workers
examined photoreduction in crystals
of ferric Mb.[29] Substantial changes in
the visible absorption spectrum occurred at radiation doses as small
as 0.21 MGy, only 1.5 s after data collection had begun. By 2 MGy
of exposure, just 15 s into data collection, the cryoreduced state
was the major component of the crystals.[29]Schlichting and co-workers did not examine Mb-II, but it is
clear
that crystals of this system are also prone to photoreduction. A Badger’s
rule analysis of the long Fe–O bond (1.86 Å at pH 5.2)
obtained from the Mb-II crystal structure indicates that the heme
center is in a ferric or ferrous state.[23] Consistent with this result, Hersleth and Andersson reported X-ray
dosage-dependent changes in the UV/visible spectrum of Mb-II crystals.
Here again, X-ray doses as small as 0.3 MGy resulted in significant
changes in the Q-band spectra. In light of the available data, Hersleth
and Andersson reassigned the long crystallographically determined
Fe–O bond to a “radiation induced state” of Mb-II,[30] consistent with quantum refinement studies that
found an Fe(III)–OH state provided the best description for
the atypically long Fe–O bond in the Mb-II crystal structure.[33]It is clear that X-ray crystallography
is not the method of choice
for the accurate determination of metal–ligand bond distances
in high-valent metalloproteins. Instead, one must turn to spectroscopy
to determine these metrics. Mb-II has been examined by nuclear resonance
vibrational (pH 8), Mössbauer (pH 7), EXAFS (pH not given),
and resonance Raman spectroscopies (pH 5.0).[15,17,34,35] The measurements
indicate that Mb-II possesses an authentic iron(IV)oxo center, with
an iron(IV)hydroxide pKa ≤ 5.Interestingly, spectroscopic and kinetic measurements indicate
that there is a protonation event in Mb-II near pH 5. Changes have
been observed in the MCD, UV–vis, and resonance Raman spectra
of Mb-II near this pH.[15,36,37] Additionally, Mb-II shows an increase in peroxidase activity as
the pH decreases below 5.[38] These changes
have traditionally been assigned to protonation of the proximal or
distal histidine and/or a conformational change associated with this
protonation. However, Wilson and co-workers have argued that these
changes are consistent with protonation of the ferryl moiety, suggesting
that Mb-II has an iron(IV)hydroxide pKa ∼ 5.[37] As of yet, there is no
evidence to support this assignment.In what follows we report
a detailed characterization of horse
heart Mb-II over the pH range of 3.9–9.5, using X-ray absorption,
Mössbauer, and resonance Raman spectroscopies. The measurements
have allowed us to set an upper limit of 2.7 on the pKa of the iron(IV)hydroxide state in Mb.
Results and Discussion
X-ray
Absorption Spectroscopy of Mb-II
Mb-II at pH
3.9 was the lowest pH sample (prepared via the rapid freeze-quench
pH-jump method, 9.5 → 3.9) that we could prepare before significant
protein degradation was observed (by Mössbauer spectroscopy).
To gain insight on the ferryl pKa in histidine
ligated systems, this intermediate was examined via extended X-ray
absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy. For comparison, samples
of the well-characterized alkaline Mb (MbIII–OH,
pH 10.9) were also examined. Sample composition was determined by
Mössbauer spectroscopy before XAS data collection. These measurements
revealed that Mb-II was prepared in >90% yield.Figure 1 shows the Fe K-edge absorption
spectra for Mb-II and MbIII–OH. The Mb-II edge lies
at a higher energy than the MbIII–OH edge, consistent
with the increased binding energy of the 1s electrons in the Fe(IV)
state. No significant change in the absorption edge was observed between
first and second scans, indicating that photoreduction was not a concern
(Supporting Information). Mb-II (pH 3.9)
exhibits a more intense 1s → 3d pre-edge transition than MbIII–OH. This transition is formally forbidden, but gains
intensity through 4p-mixing as the iron center deviates from octahedral
symmetry. The intensity of the pre-edge feature is known to track
inversely with the Fe–O bond length.[39,40]
Figure 1
Fe K-edge X-ray absorption
edges for MbIII–OH and Mb-II.
EXAFS data sets were constructed from first and second scans
only
(Figure 2). Analysis of the data yielded an
Fe–O bond distance of 1.86 Å for MbIII–OH
(Table 1), consistent with a ferric hydroxide
state. The Fe–O bond distance in Mb-II is significantly shorter,
1.66 Å at pH 3.9, in good agreement with results from a previous
EXAFS investigation of Mb-II (1.69 Å at unknown pH)[17] and with Fe–O distances reported for
other iron(IV)oxo species.[15] Our EXAFS
determined distances are also in good agreement with the results of
DFT calculations (1.85 and 1.65 Å, respectively) and Badger’s
rule predictions utilizing previously reported Fe–O stretching
frequencies (νFe(III)–OH = 556 cm–1 → 1.83 Å and νFe(IV)–O = 804
cm–1 → 1.65 Å).[15,41,42]
Figure 2
Fe K-edge EXAFS data (left) and Fourier transforms
(right) of Mb-II (top) and MbIII–OH (bottom). Black
lines show experimental data, and colored lines show the best fits.
The fits shown were obtained over the region k =
3–15 Å–1. All EXAFS samples (∼3
mM) were analyzed by Mössbauer spectroscopy prior to data collection.
Table 1
EXAFS fitting results
for Mb-II and
MbIII–OHa
Fe–N
Fe–O
N
R
σ2
N
R
σ2
E0
error
Mb-II
4
2.012
0.0027
1
1.651
0.0045
–13.1
0.390
4
2.005
0.0026
0
–16.8
0.437
5
2.011
0.0038
1
1.658
0.0047
-13.7
0.377
5
2.006
0.0036
0
–16.6
0.444
MbIII–OH
4
2.016
0.0008
1
1.873
–0.0002
–12.6
0.309
4
2.015
0.0025
0
–8.5
0.367
5
2.011
0.0021
1
1.858
0.0005
-12.9
0.326
5
2.013
0.0036
0
–8.8
0.353
Raw data were
fit over the region k = 3–15 Å–1. Coordination
number N, interatomic distance R (Å), mean square deviation in R (the Debye–Waller
factor), σ2 (Å2), and the threshold
energy shift E0 (eV). The fit error F is defined as [∑k6(χexptl – χcalc)2/ ∑k6 χexptl2]1/2. Best fits are shown in boldface. Alternative fits include the scattering
contribution of the nitrogen (N = 5) from the axial
histidine ligand. Coordination numbers, N, were constrained
during the fits.
Fe K-edge X-ray absorption
edges for MbIII–OH and Mb-II.Fe K-edge EXAFS data (left) and Fourier transforms
(right) of Mb-II (top) and MbIII–OH (bottom). Black
lines show experimental data, and colored lines show the best fits.
The fits shown were obtained over the region k =
3–15 Å–1. All EXAFS samples (∼3
mM) were analyzed by Mössbauer spectroscopy prior to data collection.Raw data were
fit over the region k = 3–15 Å–1. Coordination
number N, interatomic distance R (Å), mean square deviation in R (the Debye–Waller
factor), σ2 (Å2), and the threshold
energy shift E0 (eV). The fit error F is defined as [∑k6(χexptl – χcalc)2/ ∑k6 χexptl2]1/2. Best fits are shown in boldface. Alternative fits include the scattering
contribution of the nitrogen (N = 5) from the axial
histidine ligand. Coordination numbers, N, were constrained
during the fits.
Mössbauer
Spectroscopy of Mb-II
Mössbauer
samples of Mb-II were prepared at pH 9.5, 4.7, and 3.9 in order to
track any changes that may be indicative of ferryl protonation, Figure 3. All three samples contain one major species (≥90%),
a quadrupole doublet with ΔEq = 1.47 mm/s (pH
9.5), 1.53 mm/s (pH 4.7), and 1.58 mm/s (pH 3.9). These values are
in agreement with previous Mössbauer characterizations of Mb-II
at pH 7 (ΔEq ∼ 1.5)[34] and similar to the results obtained for synthetic ferryl
(FeIV=O) porphyrins.[43] The slightly larger quadrupole splittings at lower pH could result
from protonation of the proximal or distal histidine and/or hydrogen
bonding to the ferryl oxygen. The change in the Mb-II ΔEq as a function of pH is small in comparison to changes
that have been observed following ferryl protonation. P450s have been
shown to exhibit a ∼ 55% increase in the ΔEq upon ferryl protonation (ΔEq = 1.30 mm/s
for FeIV=O and 2.02 mm/s for FeIV–OH).[5] If Mb-II was protonated at low pH, the sensitivity
of Mössbauer spectroscopy allows for a contribution as small
as ∼5% (for integer spin systems) to be seen. Because there
is no indication of a protonated species at pH 3.9, we can set an
upper limit on the ferryl pKa of Mb at
2.7.
Figure 3
Mössbauer data of Mb samples. Black is experimental and
red is the fit. (A) Mb-II pH 9.5, δ = 0.09 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.47 mm/s. (B) Mb-II pH 4.7, δ = 0.08 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.53 mm/s. (C) Mb-II pH 3.9, δ = 0.07 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.58 mm/s. (D) Ferric Mb pH 7. (E) MbIII–OH pH 10.9. All samples were ∼3 mM. (C) and (E) are
the spectra of the samples used for EXAFS.
Mössbauer data of Mb samples. Black is experimental and
red is the fit. (A) Mb-II pH 9.5, δ = 0.09 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.47 mm/s. (B) Mb-II pH 4.7, δ = 0.08 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.53 mm/s. (C) Mb-II pH 3.9, δ = 0.07 mm/s, ΔEq = 1.58 mm/s. (D) Ferric Mb pH 7. (E) MbIII–OH pH 10.9. All samples were ∼3 mM. (C) and (E) are
the spectra of the samples used for EXAFS.
Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of Mb-II
Resonance Raman
investigations of Mb-II have been reported, but they have not found
evidence of an iron(IV)hydroxide state. Terner and co-workers examined
compound II in sperm whalemyoglobin.[19] Using 406.7 nm excitation, they observed an Fe–O vibrational
mode at 797 cm–1 (at pH 8.6), corresponding to an
Fe–O bond distance of 1.65 Å,[23] which shifted to 771 cm–1 with 18O
substitution. This 26 cm–1 shift is significantly
less than the 35 cm–1 shift predicted for an Fe–O
diatomic harmonic oscillator, indicating that the Fe–O stretching
mode is coupled to other out-of-plane motions.[19] Behan and Green examined horse heart Mb-II, using 431 nm
excitation.[15] They reported an Fe–O
vibrational mode at 804 cm–1 at pH 8 that shifted
to 790 cm–1 at pH 5. With 18O substitution,
these vibrations shifted to 769 and 754 cm–1, respectively.
The pH-dependent 14 cm–1 shift in Fe–O stretching
frequency has been attributed to hydrogen bonding with a distal histidine
residue.[15]In support of their crystallographic
work, Hersleth and co-workers performed resonance Raman experiments
on horse heart Mb-II.[12,44] They observed an 18O sensitive Fe–O stretch at 687 cm–1 (pH
7.2), corresponding to an Fe–O bond distance of 1.72 Å,[23] a difference of 0.2 Å from their reported
crystallographic value. The 687 cm–1 Fe–O
stretching frequency is approaching the value expected for an iron(IV)hydroxide
complex, but the data are far from conclusive. The 687 cm–1 vibrational mode did not shift in D2O. This is in contrast
to chloroperoxidase compound II and the alkaline forms of hemoglobin
and myoglobin, where the Fe–OH stretching frequency down shifts
∼13 cm–1 in deuterated buffer.[26,41,42] We note, however, that the absence
of a deuterium-dependent downshift in the Fe–O(H) stretching
frequency does not rule out the presence of a hydroxide ligand. The
Fe(III)–OH stretching frequency of alkaline HRP upshifts 4
cm–1 in D2O, while the Fe(III)–OH
stretch of Scapharca inaequivalvis hemoglobin
has been reported to be independent of deuterium substitution.[45] In cases were the Fe–O shift is inconclusive,
the application of Badger’s rule can provide considerable insight
into the oxygen ligand’s protonation state.In the current
study, we utilize a 501.7 nm laser line that almost
exclusively enhances the Fe–O mode. The use of laser excitation
red of the Soret band has previously been reported to increase the
enhancement of hemeiron-oxo stretches as well as decrease the risk
for photochemical damage with respect to more blue laser lines.[46] As with X-rays, laser irradiation can lead to
sample decomposition, and this proved to be particularly problematic
in early efforts to characterize enzymatic compound I intermediates.
To circumvent these issues, researchers have turned to continuous-flow
systems, spinning cells, low-power excitation, data collection at
cryogenic temperatures, and, as noted above, alternative excitation
frequencies.[22] Importantly, we found the
photolability of Mb-II at 501.7 nm to be insignificant.Resonance
Raman measurements were performed over the pH range of
4.4–9.5 to determine the Fe–O stretching frequencies,
Figure 4. Studies below pH 4.4 were limited
by sample fluorescence. Isotopic labeling experiments (18O and 2H) were paired with diatomic harmonic oscillator
predictions to identify features indicative of H-bonding and/or a
ferryl protonation event. One could argue that the observation of
an iron(IV)oxo stretch, particularly at low pH, does not rule out
the existence of an iron(IV)hydroxide species, as the sample may be
near the iron(IV)hydroxide pKa and the
FeIV–OH vibration may not be enhanced. It is for
this reason that we have employed multiple spectroscopies in our investigation
of Mb-II. Importantly, our Mössbauer measurements on Mb-II
indicate the presence of a single species (>90%) with no significant
change in metal–ligand coordination from pH 9.5 to pH 3.9.
Additionally, our EXAFS measurements indicate an Fe–O distance
of 1.65 Å at pH 3.9. Thus, in this case, the observation of an
iron(IV)oxo stretch does rule out the existence of an iron(IV)hydroxide
state.
Figure 4
Low-frequency
resonance Raman of 16O Mb-II at various
pHs. The spectra were normalized by scaling to the intensity of the
∼755 cm–1 peak. Data were collected using
the 501.7 nm argon-ion laser line.
Using 501.7 nm excitation, an Fe–O stretching
frequency
was identified at 805 cm–1 (corresponding to an
Fe–O bond distance of 1.65 Å)[23] at pH 7 and 9.5 (Figure 4). This resonance
shifts 36 cm–1 to 769 cm–1 upon 18O isotopic substitution, in good agreement with the predictions
of an Fe–O diatomic harmonic oscillator, Figure 5. At pH 5.7, the 805 cm–1 Fe–O stretch
partially shifts to 788 cm–1 (corresponding to a
distance of 1.66 Å).[23] This shift
coincides with changes previously reported in the MCD, UV–vis,
and resonance Raman spectra.[15,36,37] Spectra obtained at pH 4.4 are similar, but indicate that a larger
percentage of Mb-II lies in this alternative, low pH (acidic) conformation.
Figure 5
Low-frequency resonance Raman of 16O/18O
Mb-II at pH 9.5 (100 mM borate buffer). Results at pH 7 were virtually
identical. The peak at ∼755 cm–1 was used
to scale the spectra. Data were collected using the 501.7 nm argon-ion
laser line.
Low-frequency
resonance Raman of 16O Mb-II at various
pHs. The spectra were normalized by scaling to the intensity of the
∼755 cm–1 peak. Data were collected using
the 501.7 nm argon-ion laser line.Low-frequency resonance Raman of 16O/18O
Mb-II at pH 9.5 (100 mM borate buffer). Results at pH 7 were virtually
identical. The peak at ∼755 cm–1 was used
to scale the spectra. Data were collected using the 501.7 nm argon-ion
laser line.Interestingly, the Fe–O
stretch in the acidic form of Mb-II
shifts from 788 to 760 cm–1 upon 18O
substitution, a difference of only 28 cm–1, and
not the full 36 cm–1 observed for the high pH form
and expected for an Fe–O diatomic oscillator. As a result,
the Fe–O vibrational modes in the 18O isotopically
labeled low-pH samples are not resolvable. They appear as one broad
peak in the 18O – 16O difference spectra.
The 28 cm–1 shift in the Fe–O stretching
frequency is similar to that observed by Terner in sperm whale Mb.[19] It indicates that there is coupling between
the Fe–O stretch and additional out of plane vibrational modes
in the acidic form of horse heart Mb-II.[19]The pH-dependent shift in Fe–O stretching frequency
is likely
due to hydrogen-bonding interactions with the ferryl oxygen. This
type of phenomenon has been observed in HRP-II, where the FeIV=O stretch shifts from 790 cm–1 at high
pH to 778 cm–1 as the pH is titrated below the pKa of the distal histidine.[7,20,22] Crystal structures of HRP-I and HRP-II show
that the distal histidine does not interact directly with the ferryl
oxygen but organizes an intervening water molecule for hydrogen bonding.[10,22] In Mb-II, the pH-dependent shift in the Fe–O stretching frequency
is slightly larger (17 cm–1) than HRP-II, which
may be due to the closer proximity of the distal histidine in Mb,
allowing for a direct interaction with the ferryl oxygen.[10,12] It is important to note that the pH-dependent 17 cm–1 shift in Mb-II corresponds to a change of 0.009 Å in Fe–O
bond length, which is inconsistent with protonation of the ferryl
moiety.[23]To examine if the pH-dependent
shift in the Mb-II Fe–O stretching
frequency can be attributed to H-bonding to the ferryl oxygen, isotopically
labeled (18O/16O) samples were also prepared
in deuterated buffer, Figure 6. Previous experiments
have shown that H-bonding to the ferryl oxygen is weakened by deuterium
substitution. In these cases, a 2–3 cm–1 upshift
in the Fe–O stretching frequency is observed.[7,20−22] Experiments on the high pH form of Mb-II show that
the 805 cm–1 stretch appears at the same energy
in deuterated buffer, indicating a lack of hydrogen bonding. Similar
studies on the acidic form of Mb-II reveal that the Fe–16O stretch at 788 cm–1 shifts to 790 cm–1 in D2O, while the Fe–18O stretch at 760 cm–1 is now clearly seen at 762
cm–1 upon 2H substitution. These upshifts
in stretching frequency suggest H-bonding between the distal histidine
and ferryl oxygen.
Figure 6
Low-frequency resonance Raman of 16O/18O
Mb-II at pH 4.4 (left) and pD 4.8 (right) in acetate buffer. The resonances
near ∼720 cm–1 were used to scale the spectra.
Data were collected using the 501.7 nm argon-ion laser line.
Low-frequency resonance Raman of 16O/18O
Mb-II at pH 4.4 (left) and pD 4.8 (right) in acetate buffer. The resonances
near ∼720 cm–1 were used to scale the spectra.
Data were collected using the 501.7 nm argon-ion laser line.
Conclusion
This
analysis has utilized three different spectroscopic techniques
(EXAFS, Mössbauer, and resonance Raman spectroscopies) to conclusively
show that Mb-II exists as an iron(IV)oxo complex at pH ≥ 3.9.
Additionally, the sensitivity of our Mössbauer measurements
has allowed us to place an upper limit, pKa ≤ 2.7, on the iron(IV)hydroxide pKa in Mb-II. A similar value for the histidine-ligated HRP-II (pKa ≤ 3.6) is suggested by the work of
Sitter et al.[7] Thus, it appears that a
proximal histidine ligand is not donating enough to stabilize an iron(IV)hydroxide
state. These results stand in contrast to those obtained for thiolate
ligated systems. We have recently shown that the P450s CYP158 and
CYP119 have elevated iron(IV)hydroxide pKas ∼12.0. We have argued that this difference in iron(IV)hydroxide
pKa may be used to tune catalytic function
in heme enzymes.[5]
Materials
and Methods
Preparation of 57 Mb for Mössbauer
57Fe Heme Synthesis
57Heme synthesis
was adapted from the metalloporphyrin synthesis of Adler et al.[47] 10 mg of 57Fe metal was anaerobically
dissolved (60 °C) in 1 M HCl to form ferrous chloride. The HCl
was evaporated to dryness. The white, powdered, FeCl2 was
combined with 25 mg protoporphyrin IX in a flask containing 50 mL
of deaerated DMF. After refluxing the materials for 15 min, the mixture
was cooled on ice and exposed to air. The mixture was then diluted
10× with diethyl ether. Excess ferric salts were separated from
the ether layer with 100 mM HCl containing 100 mM NaCl. Excess protoporphyrin
IX was separated out with 1 M HCl. The remaining ether phase was then
washed to neutrality with H2O and evaporated to dryness. 57Heme was stored in a −80 °C freezer until use.
Generation of Apo Mb
Apo Mb was generated using the
Teale method.[48,49] Lyophilized Mb from equine heart
(Sigma) was dissolved into solution (water) and acidified to pH 2. 56Heme was separated from the apo protein by extraction with
methyl–ethyl ketone. Several rounds of dialysis, first in H2O and then in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7), were
carried out to remove excess methyl-ethyl ketone.
Reconstitution
A slight excess of 57heme
was dissolved in 100 mM NaOH. The solution was then mixed with tris-HCl
buffer to a final pH ∼ 8.5 and added to the apo Mb (pH 7) solution.
The mixture was allowed to stir at 4 °C for 30 min. Excess heme
was removed by anion exchange chromatography (Whatman DE-52 resin).
Fractions with R >
5
were pooled for use.
Freeze-Quenched Samples
Freeze-quench
methods were
used to generate the ferryl intermediates in Mb. A four syringe ram
freeze-quench apparatus from Update Instruments (Madison, WI) was
used for all freeze-quench experiments. Aqueous reaction mixtures
were sprayed into liquid ethane (89 K). Liquid ethane was subsequently
removed under vacuum in an isopentane bath (∼120 K), and samples
for resonance Raman, Mössbauer, and EXAFS were packed under
liquid nitrogen.
Preparation of Mb-II at Low pH
Mb-II
(4.5 mM) was generated
in borate buffer (20 mM, pH 9.5, 4 °C) prior to freeze-quenching
by mixing with ∼2.5 equiv H2O2 (in water).
Under these conditions Mb-II is stable at ≥90% yield for at
least 2 h. The solution of Mb-II was then loaded into the freeze-quench
syringe (4 °C) and reacted against a high-strength buffer near
the desired pH (potassium phosphate 5.5–7 and acetate 3.9–5.5)
in a 2:1 mixture (v/v). The reaction was quenched into a liquid ethane
bath ∼2 ms after mixing. Samples were packed for spectroscopic
analysis at a final protein concentration of 3 mM. Portions of the
quenched samples were set aside to confirm the final pH of the solution.
For resonance Raman labeling experiments 18H2O2 (2% soln in water, 90% 18O, Icon Isotopes),
D2O (99.9% D, Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc.), phosphoric
acid (99% D3, MP Biomedicals, LLC), and NaOD (30% [w/w] in D2O, Alfa Aesar) were used.
Preparation of Aqua (MbIII–OH2)
and Alkaline Ferric Mb (MbIII–OH)
Solutions
of 4 mM MbIII–OH2 (100 mM potassium phosphate
buffer, pH 7) and MbIII–OH (100 mM borate buffer,
pH 10.9) were pipetted into Mössbauer cups and frozen into
liquid ethane. Ferric Mb samples were never hand-quenched into liquid
nitrogen because of the formation of hemochrome during the (slower)
liquid nitrogen freezing process.[50] For
XAS samples, the same stock of protein used for Mössbauer samples
was loaded into a freeze-quench syringe and quenched into a liquid
ethane bath ∼2 ms after mixing. Samples were packed into XAS
cups under liquid nitrogen at 77K.
Mössbauer Spectroscopy
A spectrometer from WEB
Research (Edina, MN) was used to collect data in constant acceleration
mode with a transmission geometry. Spectra were recorded with a 53
mT magnetic field applied parallel to the γ-beam. All measurements
were recorded at 4.2 K using a Janis SVT400 cryostat. Isomer shifts
were calibrated relative to the centroid of the spectrum of a metallic
foil of α-Fe at room temperature. Data analysis was performed
using the program WMOSS from WEB research.
X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
(XAS)
XAS data were collected
in fluorescence mode at ∼10 K with a 30-element germanium detector
(SSRL, BL7-3) using a Si(220) Φ = 90° double monochromator
with a 9.5 keV cutoff for harmonic rejection. To minimize the effects
of photoreduction, samples were moved in the beam so that unexposed
portions of the sample were examined every 2 scans (exposure time
was ∼37 min per scan). XAS were obtained by averaging 16 total
scans (8 first scans and 8 second scans) for Mb-II and 18 total scans
(10 first scans and 8 second scans) for MbIII–OH.
The effects of photoreduction were monitored via the analysis of data
obtained during the second acquisition scan. Background removal was
performed with AUTOBK as found in the ATHENA package. Curve fitting
was performed with EXAFSPAK (available at http://www-ssrl.slac.stanford.edu/exafspak.html) using ab initio phases and amplitudes generated with FEFF version
7.0. Data sets were fit over the range k = 3–15
Å–1. Coordination numbers, N, were constrained during the fits. Fits included first- and second-shell
atoms and one multiple scattering component. In all cases, the second
shell was composed of α- and meso-carbons and
the Fe–Cα–N–Fe multiple scattering
paths (n = 8, 4, and 16, respectively). All distances, R, and Debye–Waller factors, σ2,
were treated as adjustable parameters, and all threshold energy shifts, E0, were linked but allowed to vary. The passive
electron reduction factor, So, was held
at 0.9. Edge energies were calibrated using α-Femetal foil
(7111.3 eV). Edge positions were obtained from the first derivative
of the data using EXAFSPAK (1.0 eV smoothing, third-order polynomial).
Resonance Raman Spectroscopy
Resonance Raman spectra
were recorded on a triVista 555 triple monochromator (900/900/2400
gr/mm) equipped with a CCD camera (1340 × 100 pixels). A 501.7
nm line of an argon-ion laser was used for excitation. The power was
<5 mW at the sample. Samples were held in a Janis STVP-100 cryostat
with a custom holder at 77 K using a ∼135° back-scattering
arrangement. Raw spectra were analyzed using the program Igor Pro
for background subtraction. No smoothing procedures were performed
on the raw data.
Authors: Yergalem T Meharenna; Tzanko Doukov; Huiying Li; S Michael Soltis; Thomas L Poulos Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Christopher A Bonagura; B Bhaskar; Hideaki Shimizu; Huiying Li; M Sundaramoorthy; Duncan E McRee; David B Goodin; Thomas L Poulos Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2003-05-20 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Regina A Baglia; Katharine A Prokop-Prigge; Heather M Neu; Maxime A Siegler; David P Goldberg Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ethan A Hill; Andrew C Weitz; Elizabeth Onderko; Adrian Romero-Rivera; Yisong Guo; Marcel Swart; Emile L Bominaar; Michael T Green; Michael P Hendrich; David C Lacy; A S Borovik Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Timothy H Yosca; Matthew C Langston; Courtney M Krest; Elizabeth L Onderko; Tyler L Grove; Jovan Livada; Michael T Green Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-11-29 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Suzanne M Adam; Gayan B Wijeratne; Patrick J Rogler; Daniel E Diaz; David A Quist; Jeffrey J Liu; Kenneth D Karlin Journal: Chem Rev Date: 2018-10-29 Impact factor: 60.622
Authors: Andrew C Weitz; Matthew R Mills; Alexander D Ryabov; Terrence J Collins; Yisong Guo; Emile L Bominaar; Michael P Hendrich Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 5.165