We developed a three-dimensional fibroblastic nodule model for fibrogenicity testing of nanomaterials and investigated the role of fibroblast stemlike cells (FSCs) in the fibrogenic process. We showed that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) induced fibroblastic nodule formation in primary human lung fibroblast cultures resembling the fibroblastic foci in clinical fibrosis and promoted FSCs that are highly fibrogenic and a potential driving force of fibrogenesis. This study provides a predictive 3D model and mechanistic insight on CNT fibrogenesis.
We developed a three-dimensional fibroblastic nodule model for fibrogenicity testing of nanomaterials and investigated the role of fibroblast stemlike cells (FSCs) in the fibrogenic process. We showed that carbon nanotubes (CNTs) induced fibroblastic nodule formation in primary human lung fibroblast cultures resembling the fibroblastic foci in clinical fibrosis and promoted FSCs that are highly fibrogenic and a potential driving force of fibrogenesis. This study provides a predictive 3D model and mechanistic insight on CNT fibrogenesis.
Engineered
nanomaterials have
increasingly been used for a wide array of applications in the fields
as diverse as electronics, energy, waste treatment, consumer products,
and medicine. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are a major class of engineered
nanomaterials possessing unique mechanical, electrical, and thermal
properties and are being produced on a massive scale.[1,2] The global market for CNTs is estimated to reach a trillion dollars
in the next decade[3] with their use affecting
millions of workers and users. Because of their rapid rise in production
and utility, it is important to determine their unintended consequences,
especially on human health and the environment. CNTs can come into
contact with human body mainly via inhalation and the major target
organ of exposure is the lung. Animal exposure studies have shown
that inhaled or instilled CNTs rapidly entered the alveolar interstitial
space to induce progressive interstitial lung fibrosis without causing
persistent lung injury and inflammation.[4−6] Subsequent in vitro studies
showed that CNTs can directly interact with lung fibroblasts and stimulate
their growth and production of collagen extracellular matrix (ECM)
leading to fibrosis.[7,8] These effects of CNTs present
an enormous health concern and a great challenge to the assessment
of potential health hazards of CNTs since lung fibrosis is a fatal
and incurable disease with no known effective treatment.Currently,
rodent models are the gold standard for the assessment
of lung fibrosis.[9] However, typical animal
experiments are laborious and could take months to years to complete.
The use of in vitro models can facilitate the rapid high-throughput
assessment of nanomaterial fibrogenicity and disease mechanisms.[10] An important pathological feature of lung fibrosis
is the accumulation of ECM that is clinically characterized by fibroblastic
foci.[11,12] The presence and extent of such foci is
one of the most reliable markers of poor prognosis in patients with
fibrosis.[13−15] Xu et al. and Zanotti et al. recently reported an
in vitro model using cell clusters (nodules) that resemble the foci
of renal and muscle fibrosis.[16,17] In this study, we developed
a 3D fibroblastic model of lung fibrosis and investigated the existence
of fibroblast-derived fibrogenic stemlike cells (FSCs) and its role
in fibrogenesis.Because fibrosis is a progressive disease associated
with aberrant
tissue repair and ECM accumulation,[1819] identifying
the cells that are capable of repairing the injured tissue and are
the source of ECM production is fundamental to the understanding of
fibrosis mechanisms. Evolving research has indicated the presence
of putative stem cells to be significant in the development of fibrosis.[20,21] Although the presence of FSCs and its role in fibrogenesis have
not been reported, a recent study has indicated the induction of stem
cells at the early onset of lung fibrosis in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced
fibrosis.[21] Because fibroblasts are known
to play a key role in fibrogenesis,[8,22] the present
study was undertaken to investigate whether CNT exposure can induce
FSCs and whether these cells possess fibrogenic activities. FSCs were
induced by exposing primary human lung fibroblasts to CNTs. These
cells were used in this study because they are of human origin and
a better representation of pathological process than immortalized
cell lines that are popularly used but may possess defective genes
affecting fibrosis development. Our results demonstrated for the first
time the induction of FSCs from normal lung fibroblasts by single-walled
(SW) and multiwalled (MW) CNTs. The FSCs possess a high capacity to
generate 3D fibroblastic nodules, which were further characterized
and assessed as a potential in vitro model for fibrogenicity testing
of nanomaterials.
CNT Characterization and Dose Calculation
SWCNT were
obtained from Carbon Nanotechnology (CNI, Houston, Texas) and were
purified by acid treatment to remove metal contaminates, while MWCNT
were obtained from Mitsui & Company (New York, NY). Elemental
analysis by nitric acid dissolution and inductive coupled plasma-atomic
emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) showed that purified SWCNT and MWCNT
contained 99% elemental carbon and less than 1% of contaminants. The
metal residues were mostly iron (Fe) at 0.23 and 0.32% by weight in
SWCNT and MWCNT, respectively. The BET surface area, length (L), and width (W) of individual dry CNT
were 400–1040 m2/g, 0.6 ± 0.5 μm (L), and 1 ± 0.2 nm (W) for SWCNT,
and 26 m2/g, 8.19 ± 1.7 μm (L), and 81 ± 5 nm (W) for MWCNT.[23,24] CNTs were dispersed by using bovine serum albumin (BSA) and were
lightly sonicated prior to culture exposure. The CNT doses used in
the in vitro exposure studies were calculated based on in vivo CNT
exposure data normalized to alveolar surface area in mice. For example,
the doses that induced positive in vivo fibrogenic response were 40–80
μg/mouse lung (0.5 mg/kg body weight).[5,6,25] Dividing this dose by the average alveolar
surface area in mice (∼500 cm2)[26] indicates the in vitro surface area dose of 0.08–0.16
μg/cm2. Extrapolation of the experimental dose to
human exposure scenarios in the workplace can be evaluated using the
approach adopted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health.[25,27] Assuming the alveolar surface
area in humans of 100 m2, the human burden is equal to
80–160 mg/Lung. Considering a lung deposition fraction of 30%
and a working day inhalation of 10 m3 (a minute ventilation
of 20 L/min), the experimental dose could be reached within 3–6
months of human inhalation exposure at 400 μg/m3 (high
CNT level reported in a research facility)[28] or about 10–20 years at 10 μg/m3 (average
CNT level in U.S. facilities)[29] (see Supporting Information Figure S1).
Effects of CNTs
on Cell Growth and Collagen Production of Primary
Lung Fibroblasts
A key cellular mechanism of fibrogenesis
is fibroblast activation and subsequent induction of ECM production
and accumulation.[30,31] To investigate the effect of
CNTs on the fibrogenic process, primary human lung fibroblasts were
treated with various concentrations (0–0.15 μg/cm2 or 0–0.71 μg/mL) of SWCNT and MWCNT (see Supporting Information Table S1 for dosimetry)
and were evaluated for cell proliferation and collagen production
using MTT and Western blot assays. Figure 1A shows that SWCNT and MWCNT had no significant effects on cell proliferation
and cytotoxicity at the indicated concentrations, the results that
were confirmed by CyQuant cell proliferation assay (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA) (data not shown). Figure 1B,C shows that
SWCNT, and to a lesser extent MWCNT, strongly induced type I collagen
production at the dose as low as 0.08 μg/cm2. Transforming
growth factor (TGF)-β, a known fibrosis inducer that was used
in this study as a positive control, similarly induced collagen production
at the concentration of 1 ng/mL. Figure 1B,D
shows an increased expression of myofibroblast marker α-smooth
muscle actin (α-SMA) in SWCNT-, MWCNT- and TGF-β-treated
cells, indicating the transformation of fibroblasts to myofibroblasts,
which is known to be the main source of collagen production. Analysis
of soluble collagen in the cell culture medium by Sircol assay further
showed that both SWCNT and MWCNT induced collagen secretion from the
treated cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1E).
Figure 1
Carbon nanotubes induce collagen production of primary human lung
fibroblasts. Subconfluent monolayers of cells were treated with various
concentrations (0–0.15 μg/cm2) of SWCNT and
MWCNT, or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 48 h. (A) Analysis of cell toxicity
and proliferation using MTT assay. (B) Western blot analysis of type
I collagen and myofibroblast marker α-SMA. β-actin was
used to confirm equal loading of the samples. (C,D) Quantitative analysis
of type I collagen (C) and α-SMA (D). (E) Soluble collagen content
by Sircol assay. Data are mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control cells.
Carbon nanotubes induce collagen production of primary human lung
fibroblasts. Subconfluent monolayers of cells were treated with various
concentrations (0–0.15 μg/cm2) of SWCNT and
MWCNT, or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 48 h. (A) Analysis of cell toxicity
and proliferation using MTT assay. (B) Western blot analysis of type
I collagen and myofibroblast marker α-SMA. β-actin was
used to confirm equal loading of the samples. (C,D) Quantitative analysis
of type I collagen (C) and α-SMA (D). (E) Soluble collagen content
by Sircol assay. Data are mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control cells.
CNTs Induce Fibroblastic Nodule Formation
of Primary Lung Fibroblasts
An important pathological feature
of lung fibrosis is the presence
of fibroblastic foci, which are aggregates of lung fibroblasts and
myofibroblasts and the newly deposited collagen.[11,15] In this study, we developed a 3D biomimetic model of fibroblastic
foci by growing primary human lung fibroblasts in culture on an adherent
substrate consisting of poly-l-lysine in the presence of
TGF-β, a known inducer of fibrosis. Figure 2A shows the formation of 3D cell clusters that are referred
to as fibroblastic nodules after treatment of the cells with TGF-β
(1 ng/mL) for 16 h. Interestingly, treatment of the cells with SWCNT
or MWCNT similarly induced the fibroblastic nodules, whereas vehicle-treated
cells showed minimal nodule formation (Figure 2A). Quantitative analysis for the number of fibroblastic nodules
demonstrated the dose-dependent effect of SWCNT and MWCNT treatment
(Figure 2B). This number correlates well with
the level of collagen produced by the cells as indicated by the correlation
plot depicted in Figure 2C showing the linear
relationship between the two parameters with a goodness of fit (R2) of 0.8629. To aid visualization of the fibroblastic
nodules, the cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 dye and observed
under a confocal fluorescence microscope. Figure 2D shows the nodule-forming cell aggregates induced by SWCNT,
MWCNT, and TGF-β but not by control treatment. The orthogonal
views and reconstructed Z-stack image series display
3D morphology of the fibroblastic nodules (Figure 3 and Supporting Information Video
S1 and S2). These results support the potential utility of the fibroblastic
nodules as an in vitro 3D model for fibrogenicity testing of nanomaterials.
Figure 2
Carbon
nanotubes induce fibroblastic nodule formation of primary
lung fibroblasts. Cells at the density of 3 × 104 cells/24-well
were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated glass substrate and
treated with various concentrations (0–0.15 μg/cm2) of SWCNT and MWCNT, or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 16 h, which
is the optimal time for fibroblastic formation. (A) Phase contrast
micrographs comparing 3D fibroblastic nodules in control and treated
fibroblasts. (B) Quantitative analysis of fibroblastic nodules. (C)
Correlation analysis of the number of fibroblastic nodules and soluble
collagen content. (D) Fluorescence micrographs of fibroblastic nodules
induced by SWCNT, MWCNT, and TGF-β. Cells were nuclear stained
with Hoechst 33342 dye and observed by confocal fluorescence microscopy.
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control cells.
Figure 3
Z-stack image series to analyze the 3D structure
of fibroblastic nodules. Cells were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
glass substrate, treated with SWCNT or MWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) and immunostained for type I collagen (green) and DAPI-stained
for nucleus (blue). (A) X–Y projection of the Z-stack image series from confocal
microscopy with the orthogonal views of X–Z plane (bottom) and Y–Z plane (right). (B) Three-dimensional reconstruction was generated
based on the results of Z-stack images from panel
A. Calibrated dimensions are width (215.04 μm) × height
(215.04 μm) × depth (12, 33.75, and 32.25 μm) in
control, SWCNT and MWCNT, respectively.
Carbon
nanotubes induce fibroblastic nodule formation of primary
lung fibroblasts. Cells at the density of 3 × 104 cells/24-well
were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated glass substrate and
treated with various concentrations (0–0.15 μg/cm2) of SWCNT and MWCNT, or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 16 h, which
is the optimal time for fibroblastic formation. (A) Phase contrast
micrographs comparing 3D fibroblastic nodules in control and treated
fibroblasts. (B) Quantitative analysis of fibroblastic nodules. (C)
Correlation analysis of the number of fibroblastic nodules and soluble
collagen content. (D) Fluorescence micrographs of fibroblastic nodules
induced by SWCNT, MWCNT, and TGF-β. Cells were nuclear stained
with Hoechst 33342 dye and observed by confocal fluorescence microscopy.
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control cells.Z-stack image series to analyze the 3D structure
of fibroblastic nodules. Cells were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
glass substrate, treated with SWCNT or MWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) and immunostained for type I collagen (green) and DAPI-stained
for nucleus (blue). (A) X–Y projection of the Z-stack image series from confocal
microscopy with the orthogonal views of X–Z plane (bottom) and Y–Z plane (right). (B) Three-dimensional reconstruction was generated
based on the results of Z-stack images from panel
A. Calibrated dimensions are width (215.04 μm) × height
(215.04 μm) × depth (12, 33.75, and 32.25 μm) in
control, SWCNT and MWCNT, respectively.
CNT-Induced Fibroblastic Nodules Contain Abundant Type I Collagen
Type I collagen is the most abundant ECM proteins robustly expressed
in lung fibrosis.[32,33] To further validate the clinical
resemblance of the 3D fibroblastic model, type I collagen expression
was evaluated in SWCNT-, MWCNT- and TGF-β-induced fibroblastic
nodules using immunofluorescence in comparison with the monolayer
of vehicle-treated control fibroblasts. Figure 4A shows that the fibroblastic nodules induced by CNTs or TGF-β
were enriched with type I collagen. Together with the cell aggregation
data in Figure 2D, we demonstrate here that
the fibroblastic nodules have important compositional and morphological
features of the fibroblastic foci observed in fibrosispatients. The
greater number of fibroblastic nodules in SWCNT as compared to MWCNT
(Figure 2) are consistent with previous in
vivo findings that indicated a greater fibrogenicity of SWCNT than
MWCNT,[5,6] thus validating the potential utility of
the 3D fibroblastic nodules as a functional assay for CNT fibrogenicity.
Overall, the advantages of this 3D model over conventional cell monolayer
models include (i) clinical resemblance to humanlung fibrotic lesions;
(ii) rapid and quantitative or semiquantitative analysis, that is,
by colony (nodule) counting as opposed to the more laborious immunological
and biochemical assays; (iii) fewer cell numbers needed per assay;
and (iv) potential for high-throughput screening, that is, by using
automated colony counter.
Figure 4
Expression of type I collagen and stem cell
markers in carbon nanotube-induced
fibroblastic nodules. Cells were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
substrate and treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2), MWCNT
(0.15 μg/cm2), or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 16 h.
(A) Fluorescence micrographs of control and fibroblastic nodules induced
by CNTs and TGF-β immunostained for type I collagen (green)
and DAPI-stained for nucleus (blue) by confocal fluorescence microscopy.
(B) Fluorescence micrographs of control and fibroblastic nodules immunostained
for stem cell surface markers ABCG2 (red) and ALDH1A1 (yellow) by
confocal fluorescence microscopy.
Expression of type I collagen and stem cell
markers in carbon nanotube-induced
fibroblastic nodules. Cells were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
substrate and treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2), MWCNT
(0.15 μg/cm2), or TGF-β (1 ng/mL) for 16 h.
(A) Fluorescence micrographs of control and fibroblastic nodules induced
by CNTs and TGF-β immunostained for type I collagen (green)
and DAPI-stained for nucleus (blue) by confocal fluorescence microscopy.
(B) Fluorescence micrographs of control and fibroblastic nodules immunostained
for stem cell surface markers ABCG2 (red) and ALDH1A1 (yellow) by
confocal fluorescence microscopy.
CNT-Induced Fibroblastic Nodules Express a High Level of Putative
Stem Cell Markers
Evolving research indicates the presence
of putative stem cells residing in the lungs to be significant in
an early development of lung fibrosis.[21] To investigate the existence of stemlike fibroblasts, we performed
immunofluorescence assays determining the expression of universal
stem cell markers ABCG2 and ALDH1A1[34,35] in fibroblastic
nodules induced by SWCNT, MWCNT, and TGF-β. Figure 4B shows that these fibroblastic nodules expressed
a high level of ABCG2 and ALDH1A1 stem cell markers as compared to
vehicle-treated control cells. These results suggest the presence
of stemlike cells in the fibroblastic nodules and support their role
in fibrogenesis. We also observed CNT deposition in the fibroblastic
nodules induced by SWCNT and MWCNT (Figure 4A and B, arrows) with minimal presence of CNTs outside the nodules.
CNTs
Induce Side Population Phenotype of Primary Lung Fibroblasts
Adult stem cells are known to efflux Hoechst dye slowly due to
the high expression of ABCG2. Flow cytometric analysis was used to
identify these stem cells with a distinct low Hoechst staining pattern
referred to as side population (SP).[36,37] An increase
in SP population was reported in the lung of mice with fibrosis, suggesting
the involvement of SP-positive stem cells in lung fibrogenesis.[21] To determine the potential role of stemlike
fibroblasts in CNT-induced fibrogenesis, we first determined the change
of SP subpopulation upon CNT treatment. Primary human lung fibroblasts
were treated with SWCNT or MWCNT at the concentration of 0.15 μg/cm2 for 48 h, after which they were incubated with 5 μg/mL
of Hoechst 33342 in the presence or absence of 25 μM fumitremorgin
C, an inhibitor of ABC transporter. Figure 5A shows that both SWCNT and MWCNT were able to induce the SP subpopulation.
The percentage of SP was approximately 5% in SWCNT-treated fibroblasts
and 3% in MWCNT-treated cells versus less than 0.5% in vehicle-treated
control cells (Figure 5B).
Figure 5
Carbon nanotubes induce
stemlike cells as indicated by side population
phenotype. Fibroblasts were treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) or MWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) for 48 h. (A) Analysis
of side population (SP) in vehicle- and CNT-treated cells in the presence
or absence of fumitremorgin c (FTC) using FACS. SP cells (box) are
determined by their disappearance in the presence of FTC. (B) Quantitative
analysis of SP subpopulation. Data are mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control
cells.
Carbon nanotubes induce
stemlike cells as indicated by side population
phenotype. Fibroblasts were treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) or MWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) for 48 h. (A) Analysis
of side population (SP) in vehicle- and CNT-treated cells in the presence
or absence of fumitremorgin c (FTC) using FACS. SP cells (box) are
determined by their disappearance in the presence of FTC. (B) Quantitative
analysis of SP subpopulation. Data are mean ± SD (n = 4). *p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated control
cells.
Increased Stem Cell Marker and Collagen Expression
in CNT-Derived
SP Fibroblasts
To determine the role of stemlike fibroblasts
in CNT-induced fibrogenesis, we isolated the stemlike cells from SWCNT-treated
(0.15 μg/cm2) fibroblasts based on their SP phenotype
using fluorescence-activated (flow cytometry-based) cell sorting (FACS).
Sorted SP and non-SP fibroblasts were further evaluated for the stem
cell marker ABCG2 and type I collagen expression by immunofluorescence.
Figure 6A,B reveals a substantially higher
expression of ABCG2 in the SP versus non-SP cells, thus confirming
the stemlike phenotype of SP fibroblasts and the reliability of stem
cell isolation by FACS. Importantly, type I collagen expression was
significantly higher in the SP versus non-SP population. It is widely
known that fibroblasts play a key role in fibrogenesis through its
ability to synthesize and secrete ECM proteins including type I collagen,
which characterizes fibrosis.[38,39] Our results thus indicate
that the stemlike fibroblasts are a potential key source of collagen
production and may play a crucial role in fibrogenesis.
Figure 6
An enhanced
fibrogenic activity of carbon nanotube-derived SP fibroblasts.
Cells were treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) or MWCNT
(0.15 μg/cm2) for 48 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
dye for side population (SP) analysis. SP fibroblasts were characterized
and isolated by FACS. (A) Fluorescence micrographs of the sorted SP
fibroblasts and parental control non-SP fibroblasts immunostained
for phalloidin (F-actin, green), stem cell marker ABCG2 (red), and
type I collagen (yellow) by confocal fluorescence microscopy. (B)
Quantitative analysis of ABCG2 and type I collagen expression. (C)
Sorted SP and non-SP fibroblasts were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
substrate, treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2), and
analyzed for fibroblastic nodule formation at 16 h post-treatment.
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versu SP fibroblasts.
An enhanced
fibrogenic activity of carbon nanotube-derived SP fibroblasts.
Cells were treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2) or MWCNT
(0.15 μg/cm2) for 48 h and stained with Hoechst 33342
dye for side population (SP) analysis. SP fibroblasts were characterized
and isolated by FACS. (A) Fluorescence micrographs of the sorted SP
fibroblasts and parental control non-SP fibroblasts immunostained
for phalloidin (F-actin, green), stem cell marker ABCG2 (red), and
type I collagen (yellow) by confocal fluorescence microscopy. (B)
Quantitative analysis of ABCG2 and type I collagen expression. (C)
Sorted SP and non-SP fibroblasts were grown on a poly-l-lysine-coated
substrate, treated with SWCNT (0.15 μg/cm2), and
analyzed for fibroblastic nodule formation at 16 h post-treatment.
Data are mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 versu SP fibroblasts.
CNT-Derived SP Fibroblasts Are Potent Inducer of Fibroblastic
Nodules
To substantiate the functional role of stem-like
fibroblasts in CNT fibrogenesis, the sorted SP and non-SP cells from
CNT-treated fibroblasts were assessed for their ability to form fibroblastic
nodules. Figure 6C shows that that SP cells
had a substantially higher capability to form fibroblastic nodules
than the non-SP fibroblasts. Altogether, these findings support the
role of stemlike fibroblasts in CNT-induced fibrogenesis.
Expression of
Stem Cell Markers in Human Lung Fibrosis Tissues
To provide
a supporting evidence for the clinical relevance of
stem cells in lung fibrosis, we performed an expression analysis of
universal stem cell markers ALDH1A1 and ABCG2 in human clinical specimens
from fibrotic and matched normal lung tissues (Origene, Rockville,
MD) using immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, respectively.
Figure 7A demonstrates for the first time an
upregulation of the stem cell markers in humanlung fibrosis tissues
as compared to matched normal lung tissues. Quantitative analysis
of the stem cell marker expression by Western blotting further showed
an increased expression of ALDH1A1 and ABCG2 in the cell lysates obtained
from lung fibrosis tissues versus matched normal lung tissues (Figure 7B). These data provide preliminary supporting evidence
for the role of stem cells in humanlung fibrosis. As the high expression
of ALDH1A1 and ABCG2 was similarly observed in the CNT-fibrotic nodules,
these findings strengthen the role of stemlike fibroblasts in CNT-induced
fibrogenesis.
Figure 7
Expression analysis of stem cell markers ALDH1A1 and ABCG2
in human
lung fibrosis tissues. (A) Left: Immunohistochemistry staining for
ALDH1A1 expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human lung
specimens from fibrotic tissues (FT) and matched normal tissues (NT).
Right: Immunofluorescence staining for ABCG2 expression in lung fibrotic
and matched normal frozen tissues. (B) Western blot analysis of ALDH1A1
and ABCG2 expression in protein lysates from fibrotic and matched
normal lung tissues.
Expression analysis of stem cell markers ALDH1A1 and ABCG2
in humanlung fibrosis tissues. (A) Left: Immunohistochemistry staining for
ALDH1A1 expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human lung
specimens from fibrotic tissues (FT) and matched normal tissues (NT).
Right: Immunofluorescence staining for ABCG2 expression in lung fibrotic
and matched normal frozen tissues. (B) Western blot analysis of ALDH1A1
and ABCG2 expression in protein lysates from fibrotic and matched
normal lung tissues.In summary, we have developed
a 3D model of CNT lung fibrogenesis
that is fast, robust, and resembles the clinical fibrotic foci of
lung fibrosis. The model employs primary human lung fibroblasts that
form a collagen-rich 3D structure upon stimulation with CNTs or TGF-β.
Using this model, we unveiled the presence of fibroblast stemlike
cells in the fibroblastic nodules and demonstrated its role in CNT-induced
fibrogenesis. The developed model could potentially be used as an
alternative assay to predict the fibrogenicity of CNTs and other nanomaterials
for their safer design and risk assessment. In addition, the model
could be used to aid mechanistic investigations of the cellular and
molecular events leading to fibrogenesis.
Authors: Susan M Majka; Michelle A Beutz; Moira Hagen; Angelo A Izzo; Norbert Voelkel; Karen M Helm Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2005-06-27 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Bethany B Moore; William E Lawson; Tim D Oury; Thomas H Sisson; Krishnan Raghavendran; Cory M Hogaboam Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: Seung-Ick Cha; Steve D Groshong; Stephen K Frankel; Ben L Edelman; Gregory P Cosgrove; Jennifer L Terry-Powers; Linda K Remigio; Douglas Curran-Everett; Kevin K Brown; Carlyne D Cool; David W H Riches Journal: Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 6.914
Authors: A A Shvedova; E R Kisin; D Porter; P Schulte; V E Kagan; B Fadeel; V Castranova Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-12-06 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Dale W Porter; Ann F Hubbs; Robert R Mercer; Nianqiang Wu; Michael G Wolfarth; Krishnan Sriram; Stephen Leonard; Lori Battelli; Diane Schwegler-Berry; Sherry Friend; Michael Andrew; Bean T Chen; Shuji Tsuruoka; Morinobu Endo; Vincent Castranova Journal: Toxicology Date: 2009-10-24 Impact factor: 4.221
Authors: Kai Wang; Lin Shi; Will Linthicum; Kun Man; Xiaoqing He; Qi Wen; Liying Wang Rojanasakul; Yon Rojanasakul; Yong Yang Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Maricica Pacurari; Kristine Lowe; Paul B Tchounwou; Ramzi Kafoury Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Donna C Davidson; Raymond Derk; Xiaoqing He; Todd A Stueckle; Joel Cohen; Sandra V Pirela; Philip Demokritou; Yon Rojanasakul; Liying Wang Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 9.400