Literature DB >> 24872401

Causes, consequences and solutions of phylogenetic incongruence.

Anup Som.   

Abstract

Phylogenetic analysis is used to recover the evolutionary history of species, genes or proteins. Understanding phylogenetic relationships between organisms is a prerequisite of almost any evolutionary study, as contemporary species all share a common history through their ancestry. Moreover, it is important because of its wide applications that include understanding genome organization, epidemiological investigations, predicting protein functions, and deciding the genes to be analyzed in comparative studies. Despite immense progress in recent years, phylogenetic reconstruction involves many challenges that create uncertainty with respect to the true evolutionary relationships of the species or genes analyzed. One of the most notable difficulties is the widespread occurrence of incongruence among methods and also among individual genes or different genomic regions. Presence of widespread incongruence inhibits successful revealing of evolutionary relationships and applications of phylogenetic analysis. In this article, I concisely review the effect of various factors that cause incongruence in molecular phylogenies, the advances in the field that resolved some factors, and explore unresolved factors that cause incongruence along with possible ways for tackling them.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  heterotachy; molecular phylogeny; phylogenetic incongruence; phylogenetic network; phylogenomics; systematic error

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24872401     DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbu015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  26 in total

1.  An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Elise Parey; Alexandra Louis; Jérôme Montfort; Yann Guiguen; Hugues Roest Crollius; Camille Berthelot
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 9.438

2.  The genetic factors of bilaterian evolution.

Authors:  Peter Heger; Wen Zheng; Anna Rottmann; Kristen A Panfilio; Thomas Wiehe
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Integrated pipeline for inferring the evolutionary history of a gene family embedded in the species tree: a case study on the STIMATE gene family.

Authors:  Jia Song; Sisi Zheng; Nhung Nguyen; Youjun Wang; Yubin Zhou; Kui Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  PhyloWGA: chromosome-aware phylogenetic interrogation of whole genome alignments.

Authors:  Richard H Adams; Todd A Castoe; Michael DeGiorgio
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 5.  Evolving Perspective on the Origin and Diversification of Cellular Life and the Virosphere.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Tara A Mahendrarajah; Pierre Offre; Courtney W Stairs
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.065

6.  apex: phylogenetics with multiple genes.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart; Frederick Archer; Klaus Schliep; Zhian Kamvar; Rebecca Harris; Emmanuel Paradis; Jérome Goudet; Hilmar Lapp
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  treespace: Statistical exploration of landscapes of phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart; Michelle Kendall; Jacob Almagro-Garcia; Caroline Colijn
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Unraveling historical introgression and resolving phylogenetic discord within Catostomus (Osteichthys: Catostomidae).

Authors:  Max R Bangs; Marlis R Douglas; Steven M Mussmann; Michael E Douglas
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  The Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Two Lancea Species with Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofeng Chi; Jiuli Wang; Qingbo Gao; Faqi Zhang; Shilong Chen
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Comparative analyses of plastid genomes from fourteen Cornales species: inferences for phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution.

Authors:  Chao-Nan Fu; Hong-Tao Li; Richard Milne; Ting Zhang; Peng-Fei Ma; Jing Yang; De-Zhu Li; Lian-Ming Gao
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.