Literature DB >> 24870562

Radiation-induced DNA damage and the relative biological effectiveness of 18F-FDG in wild-type mice.

Kristina Taylor1, Jennifer A Lemon2, Douglas R Boreham1.   

Abstract

Clinically, the most commonly used positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer is the glucose analog 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), however little research has been conducted on the biological effects of (18)F-FDG injections. The induction and repair of DNA damage and the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of radiation from (18)F-FDG relative to 662 keV γ-rays were investigated. The study also assessed whether low-dose radiation exposure from (18)F-FDG was capable of inducing an adaptive response. DNA damage to the bone marrow erythroblast population was measured using micronucleus formation and lymphocyte γH2A.X levels. To test the RBE of (18)F-FDG, mice were injected with a range of activities of (18)F-FDG (0-14.80 MBq) or irradiated with Cs-137 γ-rays (0-100 mGy). The adaptive response was investigated 24h after the (18)F-FDG injection by 1 Gy in vivo challenge doses for micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) formation or 1, 2 and 4 Gy in vitro challenges doses for γH2A.X formation. A significant increase in MN-RET formation above controls occurred following injection activities of 3.70, 7.40 or 14.80 MBq (P < 0.001) which correspond to bone marrow doses of ~35, 75 and 150 mGy, respectively. Per unit dose, the Cs-137 radiation exposure induced significantly more damage than the (18)F-FDG injections (RBE = 0.79 ± 0.04). A 20% reduction in γH2A.X fluorescence was observed in mice injected with a prior adapting low dose of 14.80 MBq (18)F-FDG relative to controls (P < 0.019). A 0.74 MBq (18)F-FDG injection, which gives mice a dose approximately equal to a typical human PET scan, did not cause a significant increase in DNA damage nor did it generate an adaptive response. Typical (18)F-FDG injection activities used in small animal imaging (14.80 MBq) resulted in a decrease in DNA damage, as measured by γH2A.X formation, below spontaneous levels observed in control mice. The (18)F-FDG RBE was <1.0, indicating that the mixed radiation quality and/or low dose rate from PET scans is less damaging than equivalent doses of gamma radiation.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24870562     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geu016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  6 in total

1.  Antiandrogen Therapy Radiosensitizes Androgen Receptor-Positive Cancers to 18F-FDG.

Authors:  Indulekha Singaravelu; Henry Spitz; Mary Mahoney; Zhongyun Dong; Nalinikanth Kotagiri
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 11.082

Review 2.  Low-dose or low-dose-rate ionizing radiation-induced bioeffects in animal models.

Authors:  Feng Ru Tang; Weng Keong Loke; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.724

3.  Biological Effects Associated with Internal and External Contamination of Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Sources: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  Amit Nautiyal; Tanmoy Mondal; Alpana Goel; Subrata Kumar Dey; Deepanjan Mitra
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-09-23

Review 4.  A clinical practice guideline for the screening and assessment of enthesitis in patients with spondyloarthritis.

Authors:  Xinyu Wu; Dong Liu; Yanfei Li; Ya Xie; Liudan Tu; Yanli Zhang; Xi Zhang; Linkai Fang; Xiqing Luo; Zhiming Lin; Zetao Liao; Limin Rong; Jie Ren; Yuqi Zhou; Niansheng Yang; Jian Xu; Hua Zhang; Baijie Xu; Zhenbiao Wu; Feng Zhan; Zhenbin Li; Weiguo Xiao; Shengyun Liu; Yi Zhou; Shanhui Ye; Qing Lv; Lijun Zhang; Dongbao Zhao; Shanzhi He; Like Zhao; Lijun Wu; He Lin; Yunxiao Zhu; Donggeng Guo; Zehong Yang; Budian Liu; Kehu Yang; Jieruo Gu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Biological Response of Positron Emission Tomography Scan Exposure and Adaptive Response in Humans.

Authors:  Kara Schnarr; Timothy F Carter; Daniel Gillis; Colin Webber; Jennifer A Lemon; Ian Dayes; Joanna A Dolling; Karen Gulenchyn; Douglas R Boreham
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Effect of Cerenkov Radiation-Induced Photodynamic Therapy with 18F-FDG in an Intraperitoneal Xenograft Mouse Model of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Yi-An Chen; Jia-Je Li; Syue-Liang Lin; Cheng-Hsiu Lu; Sain-Jhih Chiu; Fong-Shya Jeng; Chi-Wei Chang; Bang-Hung Yang; Ming-Cheng Chang; Chien-Chih Ke; Ren-Shyan Liu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.