| Literature DB >> 24868533 |
Yunhua Zhou1, Dongliang Li2, Dabing Lu1, Yuhua Ruan3, Xiao Qi2, Ge Gao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To figure out the most current prevalence of HIV and syphilis in MSM in China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24868533 PMCID: PMC4017804 DOI: 10.1155/2014/620431
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Flow chart of the meta-analysis studies selection.
Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of HIV and syphilis prevalence among men who have sex with men in China.
| Study characteristic | Stratified meta-analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV | Syphilis | |||
| Prevalence (95% CI) | Meta-regression ( | Prevalence (95% CI) | Meta-regression ( | |
| Sample size | ||||
| <500 | 5.9% (5.0–7.0%) | 1.017 | 11.0% (9.3–12.9%) | 1.007 |
| >500 | 7.2% (5.8–8.9%) |
| 11.5% (9.8–13.5%) |
|
| Sampling methods | ||||
| RDS | 7.4% (5.7–9.7%) | 0.996 | 9.1% (7.1–11.6%) | 1.009 |
| Snow ball | 7.2% (5.4–9.4%) |
| 13.3% (10.8–16.2%) |
|
| Multiple Methods | 5.9% (4.5–7.7%) | 10.5% (8.2–13.3%) | ||
| Others | 6.2% (5.6–7.4%) | 12.2% (10.0–14.9%) | ||
| Economy status | ||||
| <15,000$ | 7.5% (6.5–8.6%) | 0.971 | 8.8% (7.7–10.0%) | 1.074 |
| >15,000$ | 6.1% (4.7–8.0%) |
| 15.5% (13.0–18.3%) |
|
| Published year | ||||
| 2009-2010 | 5.9% (5.1–6.9%) | 1.017 | 12.1% (10.6–13.7%) | −0.980 |
| 2011–2013 | 7.6% (6.1–9.5%) |
| 9.6% (7.6–12.1%) |
|
Figure 2Forest plot showing the meta-analyses of pooled prevalence of HIV among men who have sex with men in China.
Figure 3Forest plot showing the meta-analyses of the pooled prevalence of syphilis among men who have sex with men in China.
Basic information of the 84 included studies.
| First author, published year | Sample size | Sampling methods | Location | Economy status | Prevalence (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV | Syphilis | |||||
| Liang, 2011 [ | 511 | Multiple methods | Foshan | Developed | 7.0 | 8.0 |
| Sun, 2009 [ | 401 | Multiple methods | Dalian | Developed | 4.2 | 17.5 |
| Yang, 2012 [ | 264 | VCT | Fuyang | Developing | 5.7 | |
| Chen, 2012 [ | 400 | Snow ball | Guilin | Developing | 3.5 | 4.0 |
|
Wen, 2010 [ | 452 | Snow ball | Guangzhou | Developed | 4.9 | 6.0 |
| Huang, 2011 [ | 395 | Snow ball | Hefei | Developing | 3.0 | 13.4 |
| Wang, 2009 [ | 1348 | Multiple Methods | Heilongjiang | Developing | 2.3 | 14.8 |
| Wang, 2010 [ | 200 | Snow ball | Lanzhou | Developing | 7.0 | 12.5 |
| Wang, 2012 [ | 400 | RDS | Mianyang | Developing | 11.0 | 23.5 |
| Lu, 2011 [ | 354 | RDS | Nanchang | Developing | 4.2 | 7.9 |
| Chen, 2010 [ | 469 | Snow ball | Nanning | Developing | 1.7 | 10.7 |
| Bao, 2009 [ | 6101 | RDS | 14 cities | Classifieda | 6.3 | 14.0 |
| Chen, 2012 [ | 300 | Snow ball | Yangzhou | Developed | 7.3 | 22.0 |
| Li, 2009 [ | 1773 | Multiple methods | Chongqing | Developing | 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Guo, 2009 [ | 204 | Venues-based | Tianjin | Developed | 5.9 | 18.7 |
|
Liu, 2012 [ | 507 | Snow ball | Changsha | Developed | 4.3 | 25.1 |
|
Qu, 2011 [ | 805 | Snow ball | 2 cities | Developed | 3.7 | 14.1 |
| Chen, 2011 [ | 831 | VCT | Kunming | Developing | 11.4 | 13.6 |
| Zhou, 2011 [ | 1166 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 14.8 | 8.7 |
|
Han, 2012 [ | 272 | Venues-based | Taiyuan | Developing | 8.5 | 13.6 |
|
Tang, 2011 [ | 408 | Venues-based | Guilin | Developing | 2.5 | 4.9 |
| Xu, 2011 [ | 436 | Venues-based | Liaoning | Dropped outb | 3.0 | 5.0 |
|
Bai et al., 2011 [ | 280 | Snow ball | Suzhou | Developed | 7.1 | 15.0 |
|
Zhou, 2011 [ | 491 | RDS | Chongqing | Developing | 14.9 | 5.1 |
| Fan, 2012 [ | 500 | RDS | Beijing | Developed | 8.0 | 22.0 |
|
Liao et al., 2011 [ | 2996 | Multiple methods | Shandong | Developed | 2.5 | 5.5 |
|
Feng et al., 2009 [ | 2044 | Venues-based | Chongqing | Developing | 11.5 | 8.9 |
| He, 2009 [ | 423 | RDS | Guangzhou | Developed | 1.3 | 14.8 |
|
Eric, 2011 [ | 288 | Snow ball | Yuxi | Developing | 10.8 | |
| Zheng, 2012 [ | 157 | Multiple methods | Beijing | Developed | 2.5 | 7.0 |
| Wei, 2011 [ | 220 | Snow ball | Taizhou | Developing | 13.4 | 14.5 |
|
Zhong et al., 2011 [ | 379 | RDS | Guangzhou | Developed | 5.2 | 17.5 |
| Zhang, 2012 [ | 503 | RDS | Chongqing | Developing | 15.7 | 6.6 |
| Xiao, 2009 [ | 1692 | Multiple methods | Chongqing | Developing | 10.8 | 8.6 |
| Xiao, 2010 [ | 4983 | Multiple methods | 20 cities | Dropped outb | 2.9 | 9.8 |
|
Zhang et al., 2011 [ | 302 | Snow ball | Beijing | Developed | 9.9 | 19.2 |
|
Zhang et al., 2012 [ | 3314 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 14.2 | 9.4 |
| Zhang, 2013 [ | 463 | Snow ball | Harbin | Developing | 9.5 | 14.3 |
|
Guo et al., 2009 [ | 433 | Venues-based | 2 cities | Developed | 5.8 | 27.7 |
|
Ruan et al., 2009 [ | 541 | Multiple methods | Beijing | Developed | 4.8 | 19.8 |
|
Zou et al., 2010 [ | 429 | Internet | 2 cities | Classifieda | 4.8 | 11.4 |
|
Wang, 2011 [ | 2020 | Surveillance | 4 cities | Developing | 2.3 | |
|
Gao, 2012 [ | 962 | Multiple methods | Beijing | Developed | 6.3 | 17.7 |
|
Zhou et al., 2010 [ | 550 | Multiple methods | Beijing | Developed | 4.5 | |
|
Zhou, 2012 [ | 294 | VCT | Shanghai | Developed | 6.1 | 9.5 |
| Ouyang, 2009 [ | 617 | RDS | Chongqing | Developing | 16.8 | 10.9 |
| Meng, 2010 [ | 287 | Multiple methods | Changde | Developing | 3.5 | 12.9 |
| Tang, 2012 [ | 303 | Multiple methods | Dazhou | Developing | 3.6 | 1.7 |
| Sun, 2012 [ | 2006 | Multiple methods | Dalian | Developed | 5.2 | 16.6 |
|
Dai, 2011 [ | 1315 | VCT | Guangzhou | Developed | 5.4 | 6.8 |
|
Mou, 2012 [ | 1526 | Venues-based | Guangzhou | Developed | 5.7 | |
| Wen, 2010 [ | 452 | Snow ball | Guangzhou | Developed | 4.9 | 6.0 |
|
Wang, 2011 [ | 300 | RDS | Kunshan | Developed | 5.3 | 25.0 |
|
Sun, 2010 [ | 1350 | RDS | 2 cities | Developing | 5.2 | 7.3 |
| Zhu, 2011 [ | 259 | Surveillance | Wuxi | Developed | 13.9 | 25.1 |
| Zhang, 2009 [ | 231 | RDS | Urumqi | Developing | 2.2 | 10.8 |
|
Chen, 2011 [ | 889 | Snow ball | Lanzhou | Developing | 6.0 | 13.6 |
|
Hong et al., 2009 [ | 593 | Venues-based | Changzhou | Developed | 13.7 | 31.2 |
| Liu, 2012 [ | 661 | Snow ball | Nanjing | Developed | 3.9 | 11.5 |
|
He, 2012 [ | 235 | Multiple methods | Geermu | Developing | 4.3 | 0.9 |
| Gong, 2010 [ | 252 | Snow ball | Quanzhou | Developing | 2.6 | 2.2 |
| Zhang, 2012 [ | 300 | RDS | Shenzhen | Developed | 7.0 | 12.0 |
| Pan, 2012 [ | 675 | Multiple methods | Shenzhen | Developed | 8.0 | 41.2 |
|
Shi, 2010 [ | 906 | Venues-based | Shenzhen | Developed | 4.2 | 14.5 |
|
Cai, 2012 [ | 5232 | VCT | Shenzhen | Developed | 6.5 | 21.0 |
| Wang, 2010 [ | 900 | RDS | Shenyang | Developed | 9.3 | 11.0 |
|
Wang, 2011 [ | 450 | Venues-based | Shijiazhuan | Developing | 2.2 | 7.6 |
| Wang, 2010 [ | 150 | Snow ball | Shijiazhuan | Developing | 6.7 | 11.3 |
|
Bai et al., 2011 [ | 280 | Multiple methods | Suzhou | Developed | 7.3 | 22.0 |
|
Zhang et al., 2011 [ | 717 | Multiple methods | Suzhou | Developed | 8.1 | 14.6 |
|
Xu et al., 2012 [ | 211 | Multiple methods | Taizhou | Developing | 10.0 | 11.8 |
|
Wang et al., 2011 [ | 201 | Snow ball | Urumqi | Developing | 6.5 | 7.0 |
|
Liu et al., 2010 [ | 456 | RDS | Wuhan | Developed | 6.6 | 21.9 |
|
Zhang et al., 2011 [ | 404 | Snow ball | Xining | Developing | 7.2 | 8.4 |
|
Wang et al., 2010 [ | 750 | Multiple methods | Yangzhou | Developed | 9.3 | 22.8 |
|
Chen et al., 2012 [ | 218 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 16.5 | 15.1 |
|
Yang et al., 2011 [ | 305 | Multiple methods | Dali | Developing | 3.0 | 2.0 |
|
Luo et al., 2012 [ | 1237 | Snow ball | 13 cities | Developing | 8.2 | 3.9 |
| Xu, 2010 [ | 1864 | Multiple methods | 4 cities | Classifieda | 6.7 | |
|
Ding et al., 2010 [ | 743 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 16.6 | 8.5 |
|
Ding et al., 2010 [ | 202 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 12.9 | 5.0 |
| Li, 2009 [ | 1691 | Multiple methods | Chongqing | Developing | 10.9 | 8.6 |
|
Feng, 2010 [ | 946 | Snow ball | Chongqing | Developing | 15.8 | |
|
Guo et al., 2012 [ | 109 | Surveillance | Zunyi | Developing | 10.1 | 1.0 |
aStudy sites were classified into different economy status when subgroup analysis was conducted; bStudy was dropped out then subgroup analysis was conducted.
Figure 4Begg's funnel plot showing the potential publication bias.