Literature DB >> 24867712

Reward anticipation enhances brain activation during response inhibition.

Patricia Rosell-Negre1, Juan Carlos Bustamante, Paola Fuentes-Claramonte, Víctor Costumero, Sergio Benabarre, Alfonso Barros-Loscertales.   

Abstract

The chance to achieve a reward starts up the required neurobehavioral mechanisms to adapt our thoughts and actions in order to accomplish our objective. However, reward does not equally reinforce everybody but depends on interindividual motivational dispositions. Thus, immediate reward contingencies can modulate the cognitive process required for goal achievement, while individual differences in personality can affect this modulation. We aimed to test the interaction between inhibition-related brain response and motivational processing in a stop signal task by reward anticipation and whether individual differences in sensitivity to reward (SR) modulate such interaction. We analyzed the cognitive-motivational interaction between the brain pattern activation of the regions involved in correct and incorrect response inhibition and the association between such brain activations and SR scores. We also analyzed the behavioral effects of reward on both reaction times for the "go" trials before and after correct and incorrect inhibition in order to test error prediction performance and postinhibition adjustment. Our results show enhanced activation during response inhibition under reward contingencies in frontal, parietal, and subcortical areas. Moreover, activation of the right insula and the left putamen positively correlates with the SR scores. Finally, the possibility of reward outcome affects not only response inhibition performance (e.g., reducing stop signal reaction time), but also error prediction performance and postinhibition adjustment. Therefore, reward contingencies improve behavioral performance and enhance brain activation during response inhibition, and SR is related to brain activation. Our results suggest the conditions and factors that subserve cognitive control strategies in cognitive motivational interactions during response inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867712     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0292-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  65 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Influence of history on saccade countermanding performance in humans and macaque monkeys.

Authors:  Erik E Emeric; Joshua W Brown; Leanne Boucher; Roger H S Carpenter; Doug P Hanes; Robin Harris; Gordon D Logan; Reena N Mashru; Martin Paré; Pierre Pouget; Veit Stuphorn; Tracy L Taylor; Jeffrey D Schall
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Common neural substrates for inhibition of spoken and manual responses.

Authors:  Gui Xue; Adam R Aron; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Sensory MEG responses predict successful and failed inhibition in a stop-signal task.

Authors:  C N Boehler; T F Münte; R M Krebs; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld; J-M Hopf
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks.

Authors:  Diane Swick; Victoria Ashley; U Turken
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  How do emotion and motivation direct executive control?

Authors:  Luiz Pessoa
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Evidence for an error monitoring deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Russell J Schachar; Shirley Chen; Gordon D Logan; Tisha J Ornstein; Jennifer Crosbie; Abel Ickowicz; Amber Pakulak
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2004-06

9.  On the ability to inhibit thought and action: general and special theories of an act of control.

Authors:  Gordon D Logan; Trisha Van Zandt; Frederick Verbruggen; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Striatal Dopamine and the Interface between Motivation and Cognition.

Authors:  Esther Aarts; Mieke van Holstein; Roshan Cools
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-07-14
View more
  7 in total

1.  Sensitivity to perception level differentiates two subnetworks within the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Shiri Simon; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Task-specific prioritization of reward and effort information: Novel insights from behavior and computational modeling.

Authors:  Eliana Vassena; James Deraeve; William H Alexander
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Reward favors the prepared: Incentive and task-informative cues interact to enhance attentional control.

Authors:  Kimberly S Chiew; Todd S Braver
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Alcohol-Preferring P Rats Exhibit Elevated Motor Impulsivity Concomitant with Operant Responding and Self-Administration of Alcohol.

Authors:  Steven Wesley Beckwith; Cristine Lynn Czachowski
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Motivational context for response inhibition influences proactive involvement of attention.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Hanne Schevernels; C Nico Boehler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Effects of reward and punishment on the interaction between going and stopping in a selective stop-change task.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Rosamund McLaren
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-11-25

7.  Monetary Reward and Punishment to Response Inhibition Modulate Activation and Synchronization Within the Inhibitory Brain Network.

Authors:  Rupesh K Chikara; Erik C Chang; Yi-Chen Lu; Dar-Shong Lin; Chin-Teng Lin; Li-Wei Ko
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.