Literature DB >> 24867089

Evidence-based patient decontamination: an integral component of mass exposure chemical incident planning and response.

Adam D Leary1, Michael D Schwartz2, Mark A Kirk3, Joselito S Ignacio3, Elaine B Wencil1, Susan M Cibulsky1.   

Abstract

Decontaminating patients who have been exposed to hazardous chemicals can directly benefit the patients' health by saving lives and reducing the severity of toxicity. While the importance of decontaminating patients to prevent the spread of contamination has long been recognized, its role in improving patient health outcomes has not been as widely appreciated. Acute chemical toxicity may manifest rapidly-often minutes to hours after exposure. Patient decontamination and emergency medical treatment must be initiated as early as possible to terminate further exposure and treat the effects of the dose already absorbed. In a mass exposure chemical incident, responders and receivers are faced with the challenges of determining the type of care that each patient needs (including medical treatment, decontamination, and behavioral health support), providing that care within the effective window of time, and protecting themselves from harm. The US Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Homeland Security have led the development of national planning guidance for mass patient decontamination in a chemical incident to help local communities meet these multiple, time-sensitive health demands. This report summarizes the science on which the guidance is based and the principles that form the core of the updated approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24867089      PMCID: PMC9100896          DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2014.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep        ISSN: 1935-7893            Impact factor:   5.556


  28 in total

Review 1.  Management of victims of urban chemical attack: the French approach.

Authors:  J F Laurent; F Richter; A Michel
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  The importance of evidence-based disaster planning.

Authors:  Erik Auf der Heide
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Skin decontamination of mustards and organophosphates: comparative efficiency of RSDL and Fuller's earth in domestic swine.

Authors:  L Taysse; S Daulon; S Delamanche; B Bellier; P Breton
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Comparison of selected skin decontaminant products and regimens against VX in domestic swine.

Authors:  S Bjarnason; J Mikler; I Hill; C Tenn; M Garrett; N Caddy; T W Sawyer
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Comparative analysis of showering protocols for mass-casualty decontamination.

Authors:  Richard Amlot; Joanne Larner; Hazem Matar; David R Jones; Holly Carter; Elizabeth A Turner; Shirley C Price; Robert P Chilcott
Journal:  Prehosp Disaster Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.040

Review 6.  Sarin experiences in Japan: acute toxicity and long-term effects.

Authors:  N Yanagisawa; H Morita; T Nakajima
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 3.181

7.  Efficacy studies of Reactive Skin Decontamination Lotion, M291 Skin Decontamination Kit, 0.5% bleach, 1% soapy water, and Skin Exposure Reduction Paste Against Chemical Warfare Agents, part 1: guinea pigs challenged with VX.

Authors:  Ernest H Braue; Kelly H Smith; Bryce F Doxzon; Horace L Lumpkin; Edward D Clarkson
Journal:  Cutan Ocul Toxicol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 1.820

8.  Personal decontamination after exposure to stimulated liquid phase contaminants: functional assessment of a new unit.

Authors:  S Törngren; S A Persson; A Ljungquist; T Berglund; M Nordstrand; L Hägglund; L Rittfeldt; K Sandgren; E Söderman
Journal:  J Toxicol Clin Toxicol       Date:  1998

9.  Rapid assessment of exposure to chlorine released from a train derailment and resulting health impact.

Authors:  Mary Anne Wenck; David Van Sickle; Daniel Drociuk; Amy Belflower; Claire Youngblood; M David Whisnant; Richard Taylor; Veleta Rudnick; James J Gibson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Modelling mass casualty decontamination systems informed by field exercise data.

Authors:  Joseph R Egan; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Maintaining Preparedness to Severe Though Infrequent Threats-Can It Be Done?

Authors:  Maya Siman-Tov; Benny Davidson; Bruria Adini
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Mass Casualty Decontamination for Chemical Incidents: Research Outcomes and Future Priorities.

Authors:  Samuel Collins; Thomas James; Holly Carter; Charles Symons; Felicity Southworth; Kerry Foxall; Tim Marczylo; Richard Amlôt
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.