Literature DB >> 24865243

[Open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Management of complications].

C Wülfing1, U Humke.   

Abstract

Current guidelines increasingly recommend organ-preserving surgical procedures in the treatment of renal tumors. Both the open surgical and minimally invasive surgical techniques are well established. In the literature, various systems for the systematic evaluation of comorbidities and complications have been reported. Already while taking the patient's history and preoperative planning prior to partial nephrectomy, it is recommended that a detailed risk assessment be carried out regarding expected complications. Essentially the two critical factors - the comorbidities of the patient and anatomic complexity level of the tumor - should be evaluated in order to achieve the best possible selection of patients for a partial nephrectomy and the determination of the surgical method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24865243     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-014-3512-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  23 in total

1.  Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centers.

Authors:  D Fahlenkamp; J Rassweiler; P Fornara; T Frede; S A Loening
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Prospective study of safety margins in partial nephrectomy: intraoperative assessment and contribution of frozen section analysis.

Authors:  Marc-Olivier Timsit; Jean-Philippe Bazin; Nicolas Thiounn; Eric Fontaine; Yves Chrétien; Bertrand Dufour; Arnaud Méjean
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  The use of partial nephrectomy in European tertiary care centers.

Authors:  L Zini; J J Patard; U Capitanio; A Mejean; A Villers; A de La Taille; V Ficarra; M Crepel; R Bertini; L Salomon; G Verhoest; P Perrotte; K Bensalah; P Arjane; J Biserte; F Montorsi; P Karakiewicz
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Consistency of ASA grading.

Authors:  J P Little
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.955

6.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: morcellate or leave intact? Leave intact.

Authors:  Jihad H Kaouk; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 7.  The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours.

Authors:  G Kovacs; M Akhtar; B J Beckwith; P Bugert; C S Cooper; B Delahunt; J N Eble; S Fleming; B Ljungberg; L J Medeiros; H Moch; V E Reuter; E Ritz; G Roos; D Schmidt; J R Srigley; S Störkel; E van den Berg; B Zbar
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.996

Review 8.  Renal cancer surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Frederik C Roos; Christian Hampel; Joachim W Thüroff
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 9.  The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Didier Jacqmin; Louis R Kavoussi; Francesco Montorsi; Jean Jacques Patard; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; Robert G Uzzo; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Complications of laparoscopic surgery for renal masses: prevention, management, and comparison with the open experience.

Authors:  Alberto Breda; Antonio Finelli; Gunter Janetschek; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.