Vikas Kotagal1, Roger L Albin2, Martijn L T M Müller3, Robert A Koeppe3, Stephanie Studenski4, Kirk A Frey5, Nicolaas I Bohnen. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. vikaskot@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Neurology Service and GRECC, VAAAHS, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular comorbidities are a known risk factor for impaired mobility in elderly individuals. Motor impairments in Parkinson disease are conventionally ascribed to nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation although progressive gait and balance impairments become more common with aging and often show limited response to dopaminergic replacement therapies. METHODS: We explored the association between elevated cardiovascular risk factors and performance on the Timed Up and Go test in cross-sectional of Parkinson disease subjects (n = 83). Cardiovascular risk factor status was estimated using the Framingham General Cardiovascular Disease risk-scoring algorithm in order to dichotomize the cohort into those with and without elevated modifiable cardiovascular risk compared with normative scores for age and gender. All subjects underwent clinical and neuroimaging evaluations including a 3-m Timed Up and Go test, [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine positron emission tomography imaging to estimate nigrostriatal dopamine terminal loss, and an magnetic resonance imaging assessment of leukoaraiosis. A similar analysis was performed in 49 healthy controls. RESULTS: After adjusting for disease duration, leukoaraiosis, and nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, Parkinson disease subjects with elevated Framingham risk scores (n = 61) displayed slower Timed Up and Go test performance (β = 1.86, t = 2.41, p = .018) compared with subjects with normal range Framingham risk scores (n = 22). When age ≥65 was added to the model in a post hoc analysis, the strength of effect seen with older age (β = 1.51, t = 2.44, p = .017) was similar to that of elevated Framingham risk scoring (β = 1.87, t = 2.51, p = .014). In a multivariable regression model studying the healthy control population, advanced age (t = 2.15, p = .037) was a significant predictor of Timed Up and Go speed though striatal [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine (t = -1.30, p = .19) and elevated Framingham risk scores (t = 1.32, p = .19) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and older age may independently exacerbate balance-related disability in Parkinson disease and may exert additive or synergistic pathological effects. The pathophysiology of these impairments cannot be explained completely by nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation or leukoaraiosis burden and may relate to systemic factors seen with accelerated aging.
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular comorbidities are a known risk factor for impaired mobility in elderly individuals. Motor impairments in Parkinson disease are conventionally ascribed to nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation although progressive gait and balance impairments become more common with aging and often show limited response to dopaminergic replacement therapies. METHODS: We explored the association between elevated cardiovascular risk factors and performance on the Timed Up and Go test in cross-sectional of Parkinson disease subjects (n = 83). Cardiovascular risk factor status was estimated using the Framingham General Cardiovascular Disease risk-scoring algorithm in order to dichotomize the cohort into those with and without elevated modifiable cardiovascular risk compared with normative scores for age and gender. All subjects underwent clinical and neuroimaging evaluations including a 3-m Timed Up and Go test, [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine positron emission tomography imaging to estimate nigrostriatal dopamine terminal loss, and an magnetic resonance imaging assessment of leukoaraiosis. A similar analysis was performed in 49 healthy controls. RESULTS: After adjusting for disease duration, leukoaraiosis, and nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, Parkinson disease subjects with elevated Framingham risk scores (n = 61) displayed slower Timed Up and Go test performance (β = 1.86, t = 2.41, p = .018) compared with subjects with normal range Framingham risk scores (n = 22). When age ≥65 was added to the model in a post hoc analysis, the strength of effect seen with older age (β = 1.51, t = 2.44, p = .017) was similar to that of elevated Framingham risk scoring (β = 1.87, t = 2.51, p = .014). In a multivariable regression model studying the healthy control population, advanced age (t = 2.15, p = .037) was a significant predictor of Timed Up and Go speed though striatal [(11)C]dihydrotetrabenazine (t = -1.30, p = .19) and elevated Framingham risk scores (t = 1.32, p = .19) were not. CONCLUSIONS: Modifiable cardiovascular risk factors and older age may independently exacerbate balance-related disability in Parkinson disease and may exert additive or synergistic pathological effects. The pathophysiology of these impairments cannot be explained completely by nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation or leukoaraiosis burden and may relate to systemic factors seen with accelerated aging.
Authors: Robert B Innis; Vincent J Cunningham; Jacques Delforge; Masahiro Fujita; Albert Gjedde; Roger N Gunn; James Holden; Sylvain Houle; Sung-Cheng Huang; Masanori Ichise; Hidehiro Iida; Hiroshi Ito; Yuichi Kimura; Robert A Koeppe; Gitte M Knudsen; Juhani Knuuti; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Marc Laruelle; Jean Logan; Ralph Paul Maguire; Mark A Mintun; Evan D Morris; Ramin Parsey; Julie C Price; Mark Slifstein; Vesna Sossi; Tetsuya Suhara; John R Votaw; Dean F Wong; Richard E Carson Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2007-05-09 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Nicolaas I Bohnen; Martijn L T M Müller; Natalia Zarzhevsky; Robert A Koeppe; Christopher W Bogan; Michael R Kilbourn; Kirk A Frey; Roger L Albin Journal: Brain Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Elizabeth L Stegemöller; Joe Nocera; Irene Malaty; Mack Shelley; Michael S Okun; Chris J Hass Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: John E Morley; Bruno Vellas; G Abellan van Kan; Stefan D Anker; Juergen M Bauer; Roberto Bernabei; Matteo Cesari; W C Chumlea; Wolfram Doehner; Jonathan Evans; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik; Paul R Katz; Theodore K Malmstrom; Roger J McCarter; Luis M Gutierrez Robledo; Ken Rockwood; Stephan von Haehling; Maurits F Vandewoude; Jeremy Walston Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Caroline H Williams-Gray; Sarah L Mason; Jonathan R Evans; Thomas Foltynie; Carol Brayne; Trevor W Robbins; Roger A Barker Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-06-18 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Anna Rieckmann; Trey Hedden; Alayna P Younger; Reisa A Sperling; Keith A Johnson; Randy L Buckner Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Diane M A Swallow; Michael A Lawton; Katherine A Grosset; Naveed Malek; Johannes Klein; Fahd Baig; Claudio Ruffmann; Nin P Bajaj; Roger A Barker; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; David J Burn; Thomas Foltynie; Huw R Morris; Nigel Williams; Nicholas W Wood; Michele T M Hu; Donald G Grosset Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 10.154