Literature DB >> 24863265

MOSAIC_SSD: a new web tool for species sensitivity distribution to include censored data by maximum likelihood.

Guillaume Kon Kam King1, Philippe Veber, Sandrine Charles, Marie Laure Delignette-Muller.   

Abstract

Censored data are seldom taken into account in species sensitivity distribution (SSD) analysis. However, they are found in virtually every dataset and sometimes represent the better part of the data. Stringent recommendations on data quality often entail discarding a lot of these meaningful data, resulting in datasets of reduced size which lack representativeness of any realistic community. However, it is reasonably simple to include censored data in SSD by using an extension of the standard maximum likelihood method. The authors detail this approach based on the use of the R-package fitdistrplus, dedicated to the fit of parametric probability distributions. The authors present the new Web tool MOSAIC_SSD, that can fit an SSD on datasets containing any type of data, censored or not. The MOSAIC_SSD Web tool predicts any hazardous concentration and provides bootstrap confidence intervals on the predictions. Finally, the authors illustrate the added value of including censored data in SSD, taking examples from published data.
© 2014 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bootstrap; Confidence interval; Fitdistrplus; Hazardous concentration; Web interface

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24863265     DOI: 10.1002/etc.2644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  5 in total

1.  Keystone indices probabilistic species sensitivity distribution in the case of the derivation of water quality criteria for copper in Tai Lake.

Authors:  Jun Hou; Qianyuan Zhao; Peifang Wang; Chao Wang; Lingzhan Miao; Chenglian Feng
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The relative sensitivity of freshwater species to antimony(III): Implications for water quality guidelines and ecological risk assessments.

Authors:  Maximilian Obinna Obiakor; Matthew Tighe; Zhen Wang; Chigozie Damian Ezeonyejiaku; Lily Pereg; Susan C Wilson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  MOSAIC: a web-interface for statistical analyses in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Sandrine Charles; Philippe Veber; Marie Laure Delignette-Muller
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  In Silico Methods for Environmental Risk Assessment: Principles, Tiered Approaches, Applications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Astuto; Matteo R Di Nicola; José V Tarazona; A Rortais; Yann Devos; A K Djien Liem; George E N Kass; Maria Bastaki; Reinhilde Schoonjans; Angelo Maggiore; Sandrine Charles; Aude Ratier; Christelle Lopes; Ophelia Gestin; Tobin Robinson; Antony Williams; Nynke Kramer; Edoardo Carnesecchi; Jean-Lou C M Dorne
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  How to account for the uncertainty from standard toxicity tests in species sensitivity distributions: An example in non-target plants.

Authors:  Sandrine Charles; Dan Wu; Virginie Ducrot
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.