Y-F Chuang1, T Tanaka2, L L Beason-Held3, Y An3, A Terracciano4, A R Sutin4, M Kraut5, A B Singleton6, S M Resnick3, M Thambisetty1. 1. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Translational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Laboratory of Behavioral Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. College of Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA. 6. Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
Although overweight and obesity are associated with poor health outcomes in the elderly, the biological bases of obesity-related behaviors during aging are poorly understood. Common variants in the FTO gene are associated with adiposity in children and younger adults as well as with adverse mental health in older individuals. However, it is unclear whether FTO influences longitudinal trajectories of adiposity and other intermediate phenotypes relevant to mental health during aging. We examined whether a commonly carried obesity-risk variant in the FTO gene (rs1421085 single-nucleotide polymorphism) influences adiposity and is associated with changes in brain function in participants within the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running longitudinal aging studies in the United States. Our results show that obesity-related risk allele carriers of FTO gene show dose-dependent increments in body mass index during aging. Moreover, the obesity-related risk allele is associated with reduced medial prefrontal cortical function during aging. Consistent with reduced brain function in regions intrinsic to impulse control and taste responsiveness, risk allele carriers of FTO exhibit dose-dependent increments in both impulsivity and intake of fatty foods. We propose that a common neural mechanism may underlie obesity-associated impulsivity and increased consumption of high-calorie foods during aging.
Although overweight and obesity are associated with poor health outcomes in the elderly, the biological bases of obesity-related behaviors during aging are poorly understood. Common variants in the FTO gene are associated with adiposity in children and younger adults as well as with adverse mental health in older individuals. However, it is unclear whether FTO influences longitudinal trajectories of adiposity and other intermediate phenotypes relevant to mental health during aging. We examined whether a commonly carried obesity-risk variant in the FTO gene (rs1421085 single-nucleotide polymorphism) influences adiposity and is associated with changes in brain function in participants within the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, one of the longest-running longitudinal aging studies in the United States. Our results show that obesity-related risk allele carriers of FTO gene show dose-dependent increments in body mass index during aging. Moreover, the obesity-related risk allele is associated with reduced medial prefrontal cortical function during aging. Consistent with reduced brain function in regions intrinsic to impulse control and taste responsiveness, risk allele carriers of FTO exhibit dose-dependent increments in both impulsivity and intake of fatty foods. We propose that a common neural mechanism may underlie obesity-associated impulsivity and increased consumption of high-calorie foods during aging.
The biological bases of obesity-related behaviors are poorly understood. Popular culture and the media perpetuate a ‘headless, hungry and unhealthy’ stereotype of the overweight individual as weak-willed, susceptible to the temptation of high calorie foods and prone to ill health[1]. However, it is unclear whether a common biological mechanism underlies predisposition to obesity as well as impulsive behavior and a preference for calorie-dense foods. This question is especially relevant in the context of aging as several adverse health outcomes are associated with obesity in the elderly [2-4]. We report on the associations between the common obesity risk variant (rs1421085 single nucleotide polymorphism) in the fat mass- and obesity-associated gene, FTO, and longitudinal changes in adiposity, brain function, impulsivity and macronutrient intake in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA)[5].Figure 1 summarizes the study design. First, we examined whether FTO genotype influenced trajectories of body mass index (BMI) during aging. Second, using serial 15O-water positron emission tomography (PET), we compared longitudinal changes in regional resting-state cerebral blood flow (rCBF), an established marker of neuronal activity[6], between obesity-related risk allele carriers (FTO+) and non-carriers (FTO−). Then, based on differences in the regional pattern of longitudinal changes in rCBF between FTO risk and non-risk groups, we asked whether FTO genotype influences longitudinal changes in impulsivity and dietary patterns during aging.
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the study design and work flow A) Our first aim was to test whether FTO genotype (rs1421085 single nucleotide polymorphism; obesity-risk allele-C) influenced trajectories of adiposity during aging in the BLSA B) The second aim was to examine the association between FTO genotype and longitudinal changes in brain function, measured by serial resting state cerebral blood flow (rCBF) through 15O-water PET imaging in the neuroimaging substudy of the BLSA (BLSA-NI) C) Finally, based on our longitudinal rCBF results implicating brain regions involved in impulse control and taste responsiveness to food, we tested whether FTO genotype influenced longitudinal changes in impulsivity and macronutrient intake patterns during aging.
Abbreviations: BLSA, Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging; FTO, fat mass and obesity associated gene
Materials and Methods
Participants
The BLSA is a prospective cohort study of community dwelling volunteer participants in Baltimore, beginning in 1958, and is one of the largest and longest-running longitudinal studies of aging in the United States [5, 7]. The community dwelling unpaid volunteer participants are predominantly white, of upper-middle socioeconomic status, and with an above average educational level. In general, at the time of entry into the study, participants had no physical and cognitive impairment (i.e. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤ 24) and no chronic medical condition with the exception of well-controlled hypertension. Detailed examinations, including neuropsychological assessment and neurological, laboratory, and radiological evaluations, were conducted every 2 years. Written informed consent was obtained from participants at each visit, and the study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and the National Institute on Aging.Cognitive status were ascertained at consensus diagnosis conferences according to established procedures described previously [8], using information from neuropsychological tests and clinical data. Diagnoses of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) were based on DSM-III-R [9] and the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria [10] respectively. Only participants who remained free of dementia or mild cognitive impairment through the follow-up interval were included in the current analyses. The final study sample consisted of 697 cognitively normal participants (total 7,300 visits) with a mean follow-up interval of 23.1 ± 12 years (Table 1). All participants in this study sample are Caucasians. Among them, personality measures were available in 692 participants with a mean follow-up period of 10.0±5.8 years while longitudinal dietary records were available in 558 participants (1694 visits) with a mean follow-up interval of 15.9 ± 10.3 years (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 1
Demographic characteristics of participants from BLSA cohort*
Whole sample (n= 697)
TT (n = 226)
TC (n = 336)
CC (n = 135)
P value
Age at baseline, years
45.8±16.8 (17–96)
45.6±15.7
45.2±17.3
47.3±17.5
0.484
Female
325(46.6)
109 (48.2)
155 (46.1)
61 (45.2)
0.827
Education, years
16.7±2.2
16.7±2.1
16.8±2.3
16.4±2.3
0.207
Mean follow-up years
23.1±12.0
23.8±11.8
22.7±12.2
23.2±11.8
0.512
Mean follow-up visits
10.5±6.0
10.8±6.1
10.3±6.2
10.4±5.7
0.596
Physical activity at baseline
0.134
Sedentary
39 (7.6)
16 (9.3)
19 (8.2)
4 (3.8)
Light
191 (37.4)
74 (42.8)
80 (34.3)
37 (35.6)
Moderate-high
280 (54.9)
83 (48.0)
134 (57.5)
63 (60.6)
Smoking
0.652
Never
323 (46.3)
106 (46.9)
159 (47.3)
58 (43.0)
Former
296 (42.5)
98 (43.4)
135 (40.2)
63 (46.7)
Current
78 (11.2)
22 (9.7)
42 (12.5)
14 (10.4)
Baseline BMI
24.5±3.6
24.5±3.8
24.4±3.5
24.6±3.4
0.817
Continuous characteristics are expressed as mean±SD. Categorial characteristics are expressed as no. (%)
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SD, standard deviation
The Neuroimaging substudy [11] of the BLSA (BLSA-NI), beginning in 1994, includes a subset of BLSA participants who agreed to annual neuroimaging assessment and were free of central nervous system disease (dementia, stroke, bipolar illness, epilepsy), severe cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease requiring angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery), several pulmonary disease, or metastatic cancer. The study sample consisted of 69 cognitively normal participants (43 men and 26 women; mean age 69 ± 7.3 years) who completed at least three 15O-water PET scans between 1994 and 2003 with mean follow-up 8.1 ± 1.1 years and total 560 scans (Supplementary Table 2).
FTO genotyping
Several SNPs in the FTO gene have been reported to be associated with obesity traits [12-14]. These SNPs are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD). Of the three SNPs in FTO that were first reported to be associated with obesity (rs1421085, rs17817449, rs9939609) and subsequently replicated in several studies, we focused on rs1421085, an obesity-related FTO SNP that has previously been associated with common mental disorders as well as with brain atrophy in non-demented older individuals [15, 16]. In the BLSA, we confirmed that the rs1421085 SNP was in high LD with both rs17817449 LD=0.927) as well as with rs9939609 (LD=0.931). Genome-wide genotyping was performed using the Illumina Infinium HumanHap550 genotyping chip (Illumina, San Diego, California), assaying >555,000 unique SNPs per sample. Standard quality control of genotyping data was conducted including verification of data completeness, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, and Mendelian incompatibilities as described previously [17, 18]. We entered the number of obesity-related risk C alleles of rs1421085 (0,1 or 2) assuming additive models. In 15O-water PET analyses where dominant models were used because of small sample size, participants with one or two obesity-related risk C alleles of rs1421085 were classified as FTO+ whereas those with T/T genotype were classified as FTO−.
Body mass index (BMI) measurement
Height and weight were measured with calibrated scales by trained technicians at each visit.
Covariates used in the FTO genotype and BMI analyses
Smoking was ascertained by self-report, and participants were categorized as ‘non-smokers,’ ‘former’ or ‘current’ smokers. In the BLSA sample, self-reported physical activity was determined with a questionnaire covering specific activities at home, work, and recreation, and metabolic equivalent of task (MET)/week was calculated accordingly.[19] Based on this measure, participants were categorized as being sedentary (0–50 MET-minute/week), performing light physical activity (50–250 MET-minute/week), or moderate-high physical activity (≥ 250 MET-minute/week). The first available physical activity category during follow-up was used in the analysis.
15O-water PET data analysis
The data used in the current analyses were obtained from a resting-state scan in each session. During the rest scan, participants were instructed to keep their eyes open and focused on a computer screen covered by a black cloth. PET derived regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) measures were obtained using [15O] water on a GE 4096+ scanner. For each scan, 75 mCi of [15O] were injected as a bolus. Images of 15 axial slices of 6.5 mm thickness were acquired for 60 s from the time total radioactivity counts in the brain reached threshold level. Attenuation correction was performed using a transmission scan acquired before the emission scans.Image preprocessing and analyses were done using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM5; Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK). The PET scans were realigned and spatially normalized into the 2×2×2 mm MNI (Montreal Neuroscience Institute) template space, and smoothed using a full width at half maximum of 12×12×12 mm in the x, y, and z plans. To control for variability in global flow, voxel rCBF values were ratio adjusted to the mean global flow of 50 ml/100mg/min for each image.Due to the relatively small number of homozygous risk allele carriers, only dominant (FTO+ versus FTO−) models were used in the 15O-water PET analysis. Voxel-wise differences in longitudinal changes in resting rCBF between groups (FTO+ vs. FTO−) were examined by group × time interaction, adjusting for age at first scan and sex. Significant effects for each contrast were based on both a statistical magnitude (P < 0.005) and a spatial extent (cluster size > 50 voxels (400 mm3)) as recommended by the PET Working Group of the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging Neuroimaging Initiative (http://www.nia.nih.gov/about/events/2011/positron-emission-tomography-working-group).
Covariates used in the FTO genotype and rCBF analyses
Mean BMI during the follow-up period of scans was calculated. We calculated overall cardiovascular risk by the number of specific cardiovascular co-morbidities and risk factors ascertained by self-reported medical history, physical examination and laboratory data. These included hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, smoking status, and history of angina, myocardial infarction and transient ischemic attack. APOE ε4 carrier status was used as a covariate in secondary analyses. Finally, volumes for each significant cluster were obtained and covaried in the model to account for the effect of potential volume differences between groups.
Personality assessment
Personality traits were assessed with the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)[20], which has been collected in the BLSA since 1989. The NEO-PI-R is a 240-item questionnaire that assesses 30 facets, including six for each of its five major dimensions of personality. In the current analyses, we focused primarily on the impulsivity-related facets of the NEO-PI-R: Impulsiveness (N5), Excitement-Seeking (E5), Self-Discipline (C5), and Deliberation (C6). Raw scores were standardized to T scores (M = 50, SD = 10) using combined-sex norms reported in the NEO PI-R professional manual by Costa and McCrae [20]. The psychometric properties of NEO-PI-R in the BLSA have been described in detail elsewhere [17].
Dietary Records
Dietary intakes were assessed by 7-day dietary records collected during 4 time periods: 1961–1965, 1968–1975, 1984–1991, and 1993–2005. The details regarding dietary data collection methods have been published previously [19, 21, 22]. Briefly, BLSA participants were trained in the procedure for completing 7-day food records by dietitians. Participants completed the food records at home and sent them to the study center for processing. Prior to 1993, in order to assist participants in assessing portion sizes, they were provided food models and a booklet of food pictures. Subsequently, subjects were given a portable scale for weighing food portions. Any questions about ascertained diet records were resolved by contacting participants by telephone.Macronutrient consumption was characterized as the average grams of fat, carbohydrate and protein intake across the multiple days of diet records. These values were then converted into calories by multiplying the total grams of each macronutrient by the corresponding number of calories per gram (1g of fat = 9 calories, 1g of protein = 4 calories, and 1g of carbohydrate = 4 calories). The percentages of energy derived from fat, carbohydrate, and protein intakes were calculated by dividing the calories from that macronutrient by the sum of calories from all 3 macronutrients (i.e. fat, carbohydrate and protein).
Statistical analysis
Exploratory inspection of the relationship between FTO genotype and BMI trajectories showed a non-linear relationship. In order to account for repeated measures of BMI and the non-linear relationship between FTO genotype and BMI changes, the generalized least squares models using gls() function from nlme package in R [23] were implemented. Chronological age was used as the time metric and natural cubic spline (ns() function in splines package) was incorporated to allow flexible modeling of the non-linear relationship. Autocorrelation of order 1 (AR(1)) was used as the correlation structure between repeated BMI measures and maximum likelihood estimation was implemented. The number of obesity-related risk C alleles of FTO (0,1 or 2), age, number of obesity-related risk alleles of FTO×age, sex, sex×age, smoking status and physical activity were entered in the model. Since the BLSA spans a long time period, birth year was additionally adjusted for in the model to account for potential confounding cohort effects of nutrition and lifestyles. Finally, a log-likelihood ratio test was used to test the significance of number of obesity-related risk alleles of FTO×age interaction.Mixed-effects models were used to investigate the association between number of obesity-related risk alleles of FTO and longitudinal changes in impulsivity-related traits and macronutrient intake. The follow-up interval was used as the time metric and included in the model as a random-effects term. Covariates in the impulsivity analysis included age at baseline (centered at 60), sex, age×time, sex×time and the number of years of education (centered at 16). In the light of a previous study among BLSA participants showing an association between longitudinal changes in BMI and impulsivity[24], individual slope of BMI change was added in the model to test whether any observed effects of number of obesity-related risk alleles of FTO on longitudinal changes in impulsivity would attenuate. Separate analyses were conducted for the four impulsivity-related traits. Covariates in macronutrient intake analysis included age at baseline (centered at 60), sex, age×time, sex×time. The year of baseline visit (centered at 1980) was additionally adjusted for in the model to account for potential confounding by secular trends of nutrition intake. Separate analyses were conducted for the three macronutrients: fat, carbohydrate, and protein. All analyses were performed using STATA version 12 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
Results
FTO genotype and longitudinal changes in BMI during aging
Demographic characteristics of participants in the BLSA are shown in Table 1. FTO genotype groups were well balanced. Frequencies of genotypes in rs1421085 were T/T in 226 participants (32.4%), C/T in 336 participants (48.2%), and C/C in 135 participants (19.4%) (Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) p=0.61). The frequency of the obesity-related risk (C) allele was 43.5%. Trajectories of BMI over time were significantly different between obesity risk allele non-carriers, heterozygous and homozygous individuals (likelihood ratio test: χ2=13.7, df=4, p=0.008) (Fig. 2). The peak BMI was highest in homozygous carriers, lowest in non-carriers and intermediate in heterozygous individuals. These results were similar in dominant models where FTO+ individuals showed significantly different trajectories of change in BMI as well as a higher peak BMI in comparison to FTO− participants (data not shown).
Figure 2
The effect of FTO genotype (rs1421085 single nucleotide polymorphism; obesity-risk allele-C) on age- and sex-adjusted trajectories of body mass index (BMI) during aging. Trajectories of BMI over time were significantly different between obesity risk allele non-carriers, heterozygous and homozygous individuals (likelihood ratio test: χ2=13.7, df=4, p=0.008)
FTO genotype and longitudinal changes in brain function during aging
There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics between the FTO+ and FTO− participants in the 15O-water PET studies (Supplementary Table 2). The FTO+ group showed significantly greater rCBF declines over time relative to the FTO− group in several brain regions including bilateral anterior cingulate gyri (BA24, BA32), right orbitofrontal gyrus (BA10), right inferior parietal gyrus (BA40), right superior temporal gyrus (BA21), left parahippocampal gyrus (BA35), and right occipital/peristriate region (BA19) (Supplementary Table 3 and Fig. 3). Significantly greater rCBF increments over time in the FTO+ group were found relative to the FTO− group in a few regions, including the left inferior frontal gyrus (BA45), left middle temporal gyrus (BA 21), and right cuneus (BA21).
Figure 3
Differences in longitudinal changes in regional resting state cerebral blood flow (rCBF) between obesity risk allele carriers (FTO+) and non-carriers (FTO−). Blue areas indicate brain regions that show significantly greater longitudinal decreases in rCBF in the FTO+ group; red areas indicate brain regions that show greater longitudinal increases in rCBF in the FTO+ group. (A) axial view (B) sagittal view.
In sensitivity analyses, we confirmed that these results remained unchanged after additional adjustment for concurrent mean BMI, overall cardiovascular risk, APOE ε4 status and tissue volume in each of the observed brain regions showing significant differences in longitudinal rCBF changes.
FTO genotype and longitudinal changes in impulsivity and food intake during aging
Based on the pattern of greater longitudinal decreases in rCBF in the FTO+ group within bilateral medial prefrontal cortical regions known to be associated with impulse control, we tested whether the FTO genotype would be associated with changes in impulsivity during aging. In general, most measures of impulsivity were found to decrease over time in both groups. These included decreases in ‘Impulsiveness (N5)’ and ‘Excitement-Seeking (E5)’ and increments in ‘Deliberation (C6) (Supplementary Table 4A). We observed that the presence of obesity-related risk allele(s) of FTO was associated with attenuation of decline in ‘Excitement-Seeking (E5)’ behavior (β(SE)=0.06(0.03), t=2.21, P=0.027, effect size=2) after adjustment for baseline age (centered at 60), sex, baseline age×time, race, years of education (centered at 16). The largest effect on ‘excitement-seeking’ was observed in homozygous risk allele carriers, least in non-carriers and intermediate in heterozygous individuals (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Table 4A). These results remained unchanged after adjustment for individual slopes of BMI change over time.
Figure 4
The effect of FTO genotype (rs1421085 single nucleotide polymorphism; obesity-risk allele-C) on trajectories of excitement-seeking (A) and fat intake (B) during aging from the mixed-effects models. The trajectories were presented at 3 different baseline age periods: 50–60, 60–70, 70–80 years of age. A. In general, excitement-seeking decreased as age increased. The presence of obesity risk alleles was associated with less decrease in excitement-seeking over time in all age periods. B. Similarly, fat intake decreased during aging. In general, the presence of obesity risk alleles was associated with less decrease in fat intake over time and at later age periods, 70–80 years of age, homozygous risk alleles carriers even showed increase in fat intake over time.
Based on the pattern of longitudinal decreases in rCBF in FTO+ individuals within the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices, brain regions that contain taste neurons sensitive to food-related stimuli [25, 26], we asked whether the obesity related risk allele of FTO influenced longitudinal differences in dietary patterns during aging. In general, after adjustment for baseline age (centered at 60), sex, baseline age×time, years of baseline visit (centered at 1980), we found that the contribution of fats to total energy intake tended to decrease over time and in contrast, that from carbohydrates increased over time in all participants (Supplementary Table 4B). However, the presence of obesity related risk allele(s) of FTO was associated with attenuation of decline and even increases in fat contribution to energy intake over time at older ages (β (SE)=0.06 (0.03), t=2.41, P=0.016, effect size=2) (Fig. 4B, table S5). On the other hand, the FTO+ group showed a trend towards attenuation of the observed increase in carbohydrate contribution to energy intake over time (β (SE)= 0.06 (0.03), t= 1.88, P=0.06, effect size=2) (Supplementary Fig. 1). Again, these effects were strongest in homozygous individuals, least in non-carriers and intermediate in heterozygous participants. After adjustment for individual slopes of BMI change over time, the results remained similar to the primary analyses.Finally, we conducted similar analyses for all outcome variables with another SNP of FTO gene (rs9939609) and all results remained the same (please refer to the supplementary material for detailed results).
Discussion
Our findings of pleiotropic longitudinal effects of the obesity-gene FTO are perhaps the first such demonstration of its influence on brain function, personality and diet in an older population. Besides showing that its influence on adiposity is persistent during aging, we find that FTO genotype is associated with reduced brain function in the medial prefrontal cortex. We suggest that these reductions in medial prefrontal cortical function mediate both increasing impulsivity as well as a greater preference for dietary fat over time during aging.Our findings are especially relevant given that most previous studies on FTO and adiposity have been cross-sectional. Moreover, relatively few studies have been carried out primarily in older individuals[27-30]. It is estimated that about 35% of adults aged 65 and over in the United States were obese in 2007–2010, representing over 8 million adults [31]. It is well known that the obese elderly population incurs higher health care costs and experiences greater disability [32]. The population-attributable risk of obesity due to FTO is estimated to be about 20% [33]. Approximately sixteen percent of individuals of European ancestry are homozygous for obesity related risk alleles of FTO and are at 67% higher risk for obesity [34]. Our observation of a robust and persistent influence of FTO genotype on longitudinal changes in adiposity in older individuals therefore implicates this common genetic variation as a key biological basis of predilection to obesity during aging. It is however worth noting in this context that besides genetic influences on trajectories of BMI, environmental factors may play a key role in determining adiposity during aging [35, 36].The implications of reduced function in the medial prefrontal cortex include increased impulsivity, encompassing behavioral disinhibition, risky decision-making and abnormalities in delay-discounting [37-39]. Given our previous observation in the BLSA of a relationship between impulsivity and BMI [40], as well as our current finding of an effect of FTO genotype on adiposity, we confirmed that this association was independent of changes in BMI. As neurons in the mPFC have also been reported to mediate food-related responses evoked by taste, oral texture and olfactory stimuli [25, 26, 41], our current findings suggest that reduced mPFC function may be a common neural substrate mediating the effects of FTO genotype on both impulsivity and macronutrient intake. While our findings suggest that reduced mPFC function may be a plausible mechanism underlying FTO-associated changes in impulsivity and diet during aging, these results warrant further confirmation in independent studies. Hess and colleagues recently reported that the FTO gene regulates midbrain dopaminergic neuronal activity. Moreover, FTO knockout mice show attenuated quinpirole-mediated reduction of locomotion and enhanced sensitivity to both the locomotor and reward stimulatory actions of cocaine [42]. Furthermore, dopaminergic cells in the ventral tegmental area receive direct projections from the mPFC and dopaminergic responses to reward-predicting cues are enhanced by functional inactivation of the mPFC [43]. It is plausible therefore that the function of the mPFC, a major target of mesocorticolimbic dopamine neurons [44], can be modulated by FTO genotype with net effects on reward-seeking behavior.In summary, we have shown that a commonly carried obesity risk variant of FTO exerts pleiotropic longitudinal effects on several intermediate phenotypes relevant to human health and disease states during aging. Its role in reduced medial prefrontal cortical brain function suggests a common neural mechanism underlying obesity-associated impulsivity and increased consumption of high calorie foods.
Authors: S M Resnick; A F Goldszal; C Davatzikos; S Golski; M A Kraut; E J Metter; R N Bryan; A B Zonderman Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Martin E Hess; Simon Hess; Kate D Meyer; Linda A W Verhagen; Linda Koch; Hella S Brönneke; Marcelo O Dietrich; Sabine D Jordan; Yogesh Saletore; Olivier Elemento; Bengt F Belgardt; Thomas Franz; Tamas L Horvath; Ulrich Rüther; Samie R Jaffrey; Peter Kloppenburg; Jens C Brüning Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2013-06-30 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Angelina R Sutin; Paul T Costa; Wayne Chan; Yuri Milaneschi; William W Eaton; Alan B Zonderman; Luigi Ferrucci; Antonio Terracciano Journal: Psychol Sci Date: 2013-04-29
Authors: Christian Dina; David Meyre; Sophie Gallina; Emmanuelle Durand; Antje Körner; Peter Jacobson; Lena M S Carlsson; Wieland Kiess; Vincent Vatin; Cecile Lecoeur; Jérome Delplanque; Emmanuel Vaillant; François Pattou; Juan Ruiz; Jacques Weill; Claire Levy-Marchal; Fritz Horber; Natascha Potoczna; Serge Hercberg; Catherine Le Stunff; Pierre Bougnères; Peter Kovacs; Michel Marre; Beverley Balkau; Stéphane Cauchi; Jean-Claude Chèvre; Philippe Froguel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2007-05-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Angelo Scuteri; Serena Sanna; Wei-Min Chen; Manuela Uda; Giuseppe Albai; James Strait; Samer Najjar; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Marco Orrú; Gianluca Usala; Mariano Dei; Sandra Lai; Andrea Maschio; Fabio Busonero; Antonella Mulas; Georg B Ehret; Ashley A Fink; Alan B Weder; Richard S Cooper; Pilar Galan; Aravinda Chakravarti; David Schlessinger; Antonio Cao; Edward Lakatta; Gonçalo R Abecasis Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: David Melzer; John R B Perry; Dena Hernandez; Anna-Maria Corsi; Kara Stevens; Ian Rafferty; Fulvio Lauretani; Anna Murray; J Raphael Gibbs; Giuseppe Paolisso; Sajjad Rafiq; Javier Simon-Sanchez; Hana Lango; Sonja Scholz; Michael N Weedon; Sampath Arepalli; Neil Rice; Nicole Washecka; Alison Hurst; Angela Britton; William Henley; Joyce van de Leemput; Rongling Li; Anne B Newman; Greg Tranah; Tamara Harris; Vijay Panicker; Colin Dayan; Amanda Bennett; Mark I McCarthy; Aimo Ruokonen; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Jack Guralnik; Stefania Bandinelli; Timothy M Frayling; Andrew Singleton; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2008-05-09 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Meltem Sevgi; Lionel Rigoux; Anne B Kühn; Jan Mauer; Leonhard Schilbach; Martin E Hess; Theo O J Gruendler; Markus Ullsperger; Klaas Enno Stephan; Jens C Brüning; Marc Tittgemeyer Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Linh C Dang; Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Christopher T Smith; Jaime J Castrellon; Scott F Perkins; Ronald L Cowan; Daniel O Claassen; David H Zald Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2017-12-09
Authors: Erika J Wolf; Danielle R Miller; Mark W Logue; Jennifer Sumner; Tawni B Stoop; Elizabeth C Leritz; Jasmeet P Hayes; Annjanette Stone; Steven A Schichman; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Mark W Miller Journal: Brain Behav Immun Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 7.217
Authors: Juan A Botía; Jana Vandrovcova; Paola Forabosco; Sebastian Guelfi; Karishma D'Sa; John Hardy; Cathryn M Lewis; Mina Ryten; Michael E Weale Journal: BMC Syst Biol Date: 2017-04-12
Authors: Frauke Beyer; Shahrzad Kharabian Masouleh; Jürgen Kratzsch; Matthias L Schroeter; Susanne Röhr; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Arno Villringer; A Veronica Witte Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 5.750