Lawrence Mbuagbaw1, Michael Thabane2, Thuva Vanniyasingam3, Victoria Borg Debono4, Sarah Kosa5, Shiyuan Zhang6, Chenglin Ye7, Sameer Parpia8, Brittany B Dennis9, Lehana Thabane10. 1. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare-Hamilton, ON, Canada; Centre for Development of Best Practices in Health, Yaoundé Central Hospital, Yaoundé, Cameroon; South African Cochrane Centre, South African Medical Research Council, South Africa. Electronic address: mbuagblc@mcmaster.ca. 2. University of Waterloo Waterloo, ON, Canada. Electronic address: nmthaban@uwaterloo.ca. 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: thuva.vanni@gmail.com. 4. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: borgdevj@mcmaster.ca. 5. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: Sarah.Kosa@uhn.ca. 6. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: william.syzhang@gmail.com. 7. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: yecl@mcmaster.ca. 8. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: parpia@mcmaster.ca. 9. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: dennisbb@mcmaster.ca. 10. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare-Hamilton, ON, Canada; Departments of Paediatrics and Anaesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Centre for Evaluation of Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare-Hamilton, ON, Canada; Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Electronic address: thabanl@mcmaster.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if the publication of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)(1) extension for abstracts in 2008 had led to an improvement in reporting abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).(2) METHODS: We searched PubMed for RCTs published in 2007 and 2012 in top-tier general medicine journals. A random selection of 100 trial abstracts was obtained for each year. Data were extracted in duplicate on the adherence to the CONSORT extension for abstracts. The primary outcome was the mean number of items reported and the secondary outcome was the odds of reporting each item. We also estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs).(3) RESULTS: Significantly more checklist items were reported in 2012 than in 2007: adjusted mean difference was 2.91 (95% confidence interval [CI](4) 2.35, 3.41; p<0.001). In 2012 there were significant improvements in reporting the study as randomized in the title, describing the trial design, the participants, and objectives and blinding. In the Results section, trial status and numbers analyzed were also reported better. The IRRs were significantly higher for 2012 (IRR 1.32; 95% CI 1.25, 1.39; p<0.001) and in multisite studies compared to single site studies (IRR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03, 1.15; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant improvement in the reporting of abstracts of RCTs in 2012 compared to 2007. However, there is still room for improvement as some items remain under-reported.
BACKGROUND: We sought to determine if the publication of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)(1) extension for abstracts in 2008 had led to an improvement in reporting abstracts of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).(2) METHODS: We searched PubMed for RCTs published in 2007 and 2012 in top-tier general medicine journals. A random selection of 100 trial abstracts was obtained for each year. Data were extracted in duplicate on the adherence to the CONSORT extension for abstracts. The primary outcome was the mean number of items reported and the secondary outcome was the odds of reporting each item. We also estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs).(3) RESULTS: Significantly more checklist items were reported in 2012 than in 2007: adjusted mean difference was 2.91 (95% confidence interval [CI](4) 2.35, 3.41; p<0.001). In 2012 there were significant improvements in reporting the study as randomized in the title, describing the trial design, the participants, and objectives and blinding. In the Results section, trial status and numbers analyzed were also reported better. The IRRs were significantly higher for 2012 (IRR 1.32; 95% CI 1.25, 1.39; p<0.001) and in multisite studies compared to single site studies (IRR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03, 1.15; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant improvement in the reporting of abstracts of RCTs in 2012 compared to 2007. However, there is still room for improvement as some items remain under-reported.
Authors: Nancy E Mayo; Nikki Ow; Miho Asano; Sorayya Askari; Ruth Barclay; Sabrina Figueiredo; Melanie Hawkins; Stanley Hum; Mehmet Inceer; Navaldeep Kaur; Ayse Kuspinar; Kedar K V Mate; Ana Maria Moga; Maryam Mozafarinia Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-03-21 Impact factor: 3.440
Authors: Meredith Hays; Mary Andrews; Ramey Wilson; David Callender; Patrick G O'Malley; Kevin Douglas Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Kamath Sriganesh; Suparna Bharadwaj; Mei Wang; Luciana P F Abbade; Rachel Couban; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Lehana Thabane Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-11-21 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jean Joel R Bigna; Jean Jacques N Noubiap; Serra Lem Asangbeh; Lewis N Um; Paule Sandra D Sime; Elvis Temfack; Mathurin Cyrille Tejiokem Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 4.615