Literature DB >> 24858536

The predictive and prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients receiving bevacizumab.

Marianne Maillet1, Johann Dréanic, Marion Dhooge, Olivier Mir, Catherine Brezault, François Goldwasser, Stanislas Chaussade, Romain Coriat.   

Abstract

The Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS), based on C-reactive protein and albumin levels, has shown its prognostic value in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC) patients receiving conventional cytotoxic therapy. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular epidermal growth factor, improves the overall survival in mCRC. The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic value of GPS in mCRC patients receiving antivascular epidermal growth factor therapy. From August 2005 to August 2012, consecutive patients with mCRC who received chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were eligible for the present analysis. The clinical stage, C-reactive protein, albumin and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were recorded at the time of initiation of bevacizumab. Patients received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in accordance with the digestive oncology multidisciplinary staff proposal and in line with the French recommendations for the treatment of mCRC. Eighty patients were eligible (colon n = 59, rectum n = 21), with a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-58 months). Chemotherapy given with bevacizumab and 5-fluorouracil was oxaliplatin (n = 41, 51%) or irinotecan (n = 27, 34%). At baseline, 56, 31 and 13% of patients had a GPS of 0 (n = 45), 1 (n = 25) and 2 (n = 10), respectively. The median progression-free survival in these groups was 10.1, 6.5 and 5.6 months (P = 0.16), respectively. The median overall survival was 20.1, 11.4 and 6.5 months, respectively (P = 0.004). Our study confirmed the prognostic value of GPS in mCRC patients receiving chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Given the poor survival observed in patients with an GPS of 2, studies dedicated to these patients could identify optimal treatment modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24858536     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  9 in total

1.  VB-111: a novel anti-vascular therapeutic for glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gruslova; David A Cavazos; Jessica R Miller; Eyal Breitbart; Yael C Cohen; Livnat Bangio; Niva Yakov; Anu Soundararajan; John R Floyd; Andrew J Brenner
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Prognostic factors for survival with bevacizumab-based therapy in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and pooled analysis of 11,585 patients.

Authors:  Fausto Petrelli; Andrea Coinu; Mary Cabiddu; Karen Borgonovo; Veronica Lonati; Mara Ghilardi; Sandro Barni
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  The application of the Palliative Prognostic Index, charlson comorbidity index, and Glasgow Prognostic Score in predicting the life expectancy of patients with hematologic malignancies under palliative care.

Authors:  Wen-Chi Chou; Chen-Yi Kao; Po-Nan Wang; Hung Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Pei-Hung Chang; Kun-Yun Yeh; Yu-Shin Hung
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Inventory of oncologists' unmet needs for tools to support decision-making about palliative treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ellen G Engelhardt; Dóra Révész; Hans J Tamminga; Cornelis J A Punt; Miriam Koopman; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Ewout W Steyerberg; Henrica C W de Vet; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow prognostic score in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 9,839 patients.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Wanying Guo; Wei Xu; Xuelei Zhang; Zhijie Shi; Leizhen Zheng; Wenzhao Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Anti-epidermal or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor as first-line metastatic colorectal cancer in modified Glasgow prognostic score 2' patients.

Authors:  Johann Dréanic; Marion Dhooge; Maximilien Barret; Catherine Brezault; Olivier Mir; Stanislas Chaussade; Romain Coriat
Journal:  J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 12.910

7.  A Survey of Attitudes towards the Clinical Application of Systemic Inflammation Based Prognostic Scores in Cancer.

Authors:  David G Watt; Campbell S Roxburgh; Mark White; Juen Zhik Chan; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-10-04       Impact factor: 4.711

8.  The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score as a powerful prognostic factor in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Hideyasu Matsuyama; Shigeru Sakano; Naokazu Ibuki; Kiyoshi Takahara; Kazumasa Komura; Tomoaki Takai; Takuya Tsujino; Yuki Yoshikawa; Koichiro Minami; Kazuhiro Nagao; Ryo Inoue; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-23

9.  Glasgow Prognostic Score as a Marker of Mortality after TAVI.

Authors:  Ozge Ozcan Abacioglu; Nermin Yildiz Koyunsever; Salih Kilic; Arafat Yildirim; Ibrahim Halil Kurt
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-12-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.