Literature DB >> 24858380

Prospective study of the cementless "New Wave" total knee mobile-bearing arthroplasty: 8-year follow-up.

Xavier Normand1, Jean-Louis Pinçon, Jean-Marie Ragot, Régis Verdier, Thierry Aslanian.   

Abstract

One of the main factors affecting the survival of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the fixation method. The constraints placed on the bone-implant interface of a mobile-bearing TKA must be taken in account during the design and evaluation phases. For more than two decades, calcium phosphate ceramics, particularly hydroxyapatitis, have been used in Europe to accelerate the bone integration of cementless implants. A prospective study of patients continuously recruited by three senior surgeons at three French private hospitals has been carried out. There were no exclusion criteria. Eighty-four (84) cementless mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis of the brand "New Wave" were implanted in 74 patients over a 2-year period (2004-2005). Implant survival at 8 years was 95% [with a confidence interval of 95%: 80.2-96.4%] when revision for any cause was defined as the endpoint. Five implants required surgical revision to exchange all or part of the implant: two for aseptic loosening of tibial component, one for osteolysis, one for persistent flessum (30°) and one for tibial periprosthetic fracture. Completely integrated implants and event-free outcomes were recorded in 91.4% of the cases at eight-year follow-up. The Hospital for Special Surgery score significantly improved from 56.8/100 points before the surgery to 83.9/100 points at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). Radiologically, only one patient had radiolucent lines around the tibial and femoral components. This cementless total knee prosthesis yielded good medium-term survival. Cementless arthroplasty can generate solid and durable bone fixation in this total weight-bearing implant, and it seems that the hidroxyapathitis surface in this series stimulate the bone integration at the bone-implant interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24858380     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-014-1484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  11 in total

1.  Midterm results of mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 65 years.

Authors:  R B Sorrells; J B Stiehl; P E Voorhorst
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M M Petersen; P T Nielsen; A Lebech; S Toksvig-Larsen; B Lund
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Total condylar knee replacment: preliminary report.

Authors:  J Insall; C S Ranawat; W N Scott; P Walker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Does the method of component fixation influence clinical outcomes after total knee replacement? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  John B Arnold; Julie L Walters; Lucian B Solomon; Dominic Thewlis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases.

Authors:  J-N Argenson; S Boisgard; S Parratte; S Descamps; M Bercovy; P Bonnevialle; J-L Briard; J Brilhault; J Chouteau; R Nizard; D Saragaglia; E Servien
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.256

6.  Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Frederick F Buechel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Uncemented rotating-platform total knee replacement: a five to twelve-year follow-up study.

Authors:  R Barry Sorrells; Paul E Voorhorst; Jeffrey A Murphy; Maryrose P Bauschka; A Seth Greenwald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry.

Authors:  K G Nilsson; J Kärrholm; L Carlsson; T Dalén
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Is hydroxyapatite a reliable fixation option in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty? A 5- to 13-year experience with the hydroxyapatite-coated unix prosthesis.

Authors:  Jean-Alain Epinette; Michael T Manley
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.